Search Climate Insights Directory

This amicus curiae brief, submitted by the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) and other organizations, argues that the International Organizations Immunities Act (IOIA) should be interpreted under a "restrictive theory" of immunity. The brief contends that international organizations, such as the International Finance Corporation (IFC), should be immune from suits relating to governmental acts but not from those relating to commercial activities, aligning the IOIA with the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA).

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) expresses support for three UN Environment Programme (UNEP) reports published in 2018 regarding endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), emphasizing the need for these findings to be translated into effective regulatory policies.

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) issued a statement criticizing the United States' withdrawal from the United Nations Human Rights Council, arguing that the move undermines global human rights protections and allows the U.S. to avoid international scrutiny.

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) responds to a Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling that allows the State Attorney General to investigate ExxonMobil regarding the concealment of fossil fuels' role in climate change.

This briefing note from the Center for International Environmental Law outlines opportunities to enhance public participation and access to information within the UNFCCC process, specifically during the 48th Session of the Subsidiary Bodies. It argues that integrating procedural rights into the implementation guidelines of the Paris Agreement is essential for effective climate action and alignment with the Sustainable Development Goals.

This document is a cover letter accompanying a Joint Summary of Amicus Curiae Briefs submitted to the Commission on Human Rights of the Philippines. The submission supports petitioners Greenpeace Southeast Asia et al. in a national inquiry into the impact of climate change on the human rights of the Filipino people, specifically focusing on the responsibility of 'Carbon Majors' companies for human rights violations.

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) issued a statement on March 14, 2018, condemning the Philippine government's accusation of terrorism against UN Special Rapporteur Vicky Tauli-Corpuz and other human rights defenders.

A statement by CIEL President Carroll Muffett regarding the termination of Rex Tillerson as US Secretary of State, criticizing the impact of his tenure and the Trump Administration on US foreign policy and the environment.

A joint statement delivered to the UN Human Rights Council on 9 March 2018 by a coalition of NGOs, including the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom and the Center for International Environmental Law. The statement advocates for a legally binding international instrument to regulate transnational corporations, emphasizing the need to integrate a feminist perspective to address the specific human rights abuses women face from corporate activities.

An oral intervention by the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) delivered to the Human Rights Council's 37th Session, advocating for a binding treaty that safeguards human rights against the influence of transnational corporations (TNCs) in international investment agreements.

This report by the Center for International Environmental Law argues that the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) undermines the ability of EU Member States to protect public health and the environment by limiting regulatory discretion and promoting deregulation.

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) expresses support for the adoption of a binding regional agreement between most Latin American and Caribbean countries focused on access rights to information, participation, and justice in environmental decision-making.

This statement by the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), delivered at the SAICM Beyond 2020 meeting in March 2018, argues that the financing for the sound management of chemicals is critically insufficient and disproportionately borne by societies rather than the chemical industry. CIEL calls for a shift away from sole reliance on international donors toward a model that includes industry financial contributions.

This briefing by the Center for International Environmental Law describes the 2018 Talanoa Dialogue, a facilitative process designed to raise climate ambition and inform future Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement. The document provides a roadmap for civil society and indigenous peoples to integrate human rights, gender equality, and just transition principles into the dialogue's narrative through a specific, story-based methodology.

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) and other civil society groups are urging the Green Climate Fund (GCF) to adopt permanent environmental and social policies during its nineteenth meeting (B.19) to ensure human rights and environmental protections in its climate projects.

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) submitted recommendations to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) regarding the Draft Guidelines on Effective Implementation of the Right to Participate in Public Affairs. CIEL argues that the guidelines must address the systemic constraining of fundamental rights, specifically emphasizing the intersection of environmental decision-making, human rights, and the opacity of international investment agreements.

This briefing by the Center for International Environmental Law reviews the status of human rights, gender equality, and other social considerations within the negotiations for the Paris Agreement's implementation guidelines as of February 2018. It analyzes four key agenda items—Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), Adaptation Communications, the Enhanced Transparency Framework (ETF), and the Global Stocktake (GST)—detailing the proposals made by various countries and the extent to which these social dimensions were reflected in the co-facilitators' notes following COP-23.

A statement by CIEL President & CEO Carroll Muffett criticizing Exxon's legal strategy of filing discovery requests and lawsuits against public officials, attorneys, and organizations investigating the company's role in the climate crisis.

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) submitted comments on December 20, 2017, regarding the World Bank's Draft Guidance Notes for the Environmental and Social Standards (ESS) of the Environmental and Social Framework (ESF). CIEL argues that the Guidance Notes are "severely lacking in substance" and often merely reiterate the standards or use vague language rather than providing the detailed implementation guidance necessary to prevent harm to people and the environment.

This parallel report, submitted by the Instituto Internacional de Derecho y Medio Ambiente (IIDMA) and the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) to the Committee on the Rights of the Child, argues that Spain's continued reliance on coal-fired power plants violates children's rights to health and a sustainable environment. The authors highlight the severe respiratory impacts of air pollution on children and the contribution of these plants to global climate change, urging the Spanish government to phase out coal power.