Search Climate Insights Directory

The document examines governance in Ghana, Rwanda, Kenya, Algeria, South Africa, and Benin, identifying a systemic gap between constitutional intentions and practical implementation. The author argues that a lack of 'constitutionalism' leads to executive dominance, weakened legislatures, and compromised judicial independence. Key areas of concern include the manipulation of electoral systems, systemic corruption, marginalization of women and children, and land ownership conflicts. The paper concludes that while the APRM is an effective early-warning system, its impact is limited because member states often ignore its recommendations.

The document analyzes the geopolitical changes in Eastern DRC following the January 2009 agreement between the DRC government and the CNDP, which led to the joint military operation 'Umoja wetu' with Rwanda against the FDLR. While the operation resulted in the repatriation of 1,003 FDLR combatants and their dependents, the author questions its overall success due to the lack of action in South Kivu and the impending withdrawal of Rwandan troops. The briefing warns that the 'accelerated plan' for integrating rebels into the FARDC repeats failed processes from 2007 and highlights risks of humanitarian crises and ethnic violence if security vacuums emerge after Rwandan forces depart.

The manual defines conflict-sensitive conservation (CSC) as programming that accounts for the causes, actors, and impacts of conflict to avoid exacerbating tensions and to support peace. It outlines a three-step institutional process for organizations to adopt CSC—assessing capacity, allocating human resources, and developing guiding principles—and a two-step project-level process involving conflict analysis and the design of sensitive solutions. The manual emphasizes that conservation can inadvertently fuel conflict by restricting resource access, imposing economic burdens, or distributing benefits unequally, but it can also foster peace by addressing root causes of resource scarcity and creating non-threatening spaces for dialogue.

The manual introduces 'Conflict-Sensitive Conservation' (CSC), a process designed for conservation organizations operating in or near protected areas, particularly in conflict-prone regions. It argues that while conservation can prevent conflict by managing scarce resources, poorly designed interventions—such as restricting resource access or unequal benefit distribution—can inadvertently trigger or fuel violence. The guide outlines a three-step institutional process to adopt CSC (assessing capacity, allocating human resources, and defining principles) and a two-step programmatic process (conflict analysis and the design/monitoring of solutions). It provides specific tools for analysis, including conflict trees, conflict mapping, and stakeholder profiling, and emphasizes the importance of gender-sensitive approaches to peacebuilding.

The document highlights how two decades of conflict in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo have created a humanitarian crisis and severely threatened Virunga National Park. It argues that the illegal trade in park resources, specifically charcoal, funds violence and leads to deforestation, while the displacement of populations increases pressure on the ecosystem. The author contends that environmental governance must be integrated into any peace agreements to prevent natural resources from continuing to finance conflict and to support future economic recovery.

The report analyzes the systemic nature of corruption in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) from 2003 to 2006, arguing that the 'kleptocratic' legacy of the Mobutu era persisted through the transition. It details how power-sharing agreements under the Sun City Accord prioritized political clientelism over merit, leading to widespread pillaging of public finances, state-owned enterprises, and the mining and forestry sectors. Despite the introduction of new anti-corruption laws and the creation of monitoring bodies like the CELC and OCEP, the report finds these efforts largely failed due to a lack of political will, institutional dysfunction, and the complicity of international partners who prioritized electoral stability over good governance.

The document examines the hydropolitics of the Nile Basin, focusing on the tensions between upstream states, particularly Ethiopia, and downstream states, Egypt and Sudan. It argues that colonial-era agreements and Egypt's pursuit of 'prior appropriation' rights have created an inequitable distribution of water, hindering development in upper riparian states. The author suggests that cooperation through frameworks like the Nile Basin Initiative and the adoption of the Helsinki Rules for equitable sharing are necessary to avoid future conflict and ensure food and energy security.

The document reports on a September 2008 seminar discussing how international criminal justice, anchored by the ICC, interacts with the African Peace and Security Architecture (APSA). Participants debated the 'peace-justice nexus,' arguing that while tensions can exist, retributive and restorative justice should be pursued simultaneously to remove threats to security. The discussions highlighted that the ICC can provide a 'win-win dividend' for APSA by addressing institutional deficiencies in the 'African solutions to African problems' approach, serving as a non-violent alternative to the use of force.

The document examines the relationship between media freedom and good governance, specifically focusing on the omissions within the African Union's African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM). It argues that without an independent media to act as a watchdog, democratic governance is impossible. The author highlights the prevalence of 'insult laws' across 48 of 53 African countries as a primary barrier to press freedom and suggests specific revisions to the APRM questionnaire to ensure media independence is assessed. Case studies of South Africa, Ghana, Kenya, and Rwanda illustrate varying levels of media freedom and the tendency of official reports to overlook the media's critical role in accountability.

The research paper examines the relationship between media freedom and good governance within the context of the African Union's African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM). The author contends that the APRM's failure to mandate free and independent media as a requirement for 'good governance' undermines the mechanism's effectiveness and allows authoritarian regimes to pass assessment tests. The paper analyzes the media landscapes of South Africa, Ghana, Kenya, and Rwanda, noting a general lack of recognition for the media's 'watchdog' role in their national reports. It further highlights the prevalence of 'insult laws' across 48 of 53 African countries, which criminalize criticism of government officials. The document concludes with a proposal to revise the APRM questionnaire to include specific indicators on media freedom, access to information, and the abolition of restrictive press laws.

The author argues that the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) in South Africa missed a critical opportunity for public engagement because the government, specifically through the office of Minister Geraldine Fraser-Moleketi, centralized and dominated the process. This centralization marginalized civil society and the media, leading to a lack of transparency and public interest. The paper highlights the tension between the Sunday Times, which attempted critical coverage of the process, and the government, which reacted defensively to reports on national failures such as crime and child safety. It concludes that for the APRM to be an effective policy tool, governments must adopt a less defensive posture, ensure genuine transparency, and actively engage the media to translate complex reports into public-interest news.

The document analyzes two legal pathways for prosecuting Robert Mugabe: the principle of universal jurisdiction and the International Criminal Court (ICC). While legal grounds exist for crimes committed after July 2002—such as 'Operation Murambatsvina' and election violence—the author concludes that prosecution is 'extremely unlikely' due to political obstacles. These include Zimbabwe's lack of ratification of the ICC statute and the likelihood that immunity from prosecution will be a key negotiation point to secure Mugabe's removal from power.

The document examines the persistence of a 'predatory political and governance culture' in the DRC, tracing it from the colonial era and Mobutu's dictatorship through the 2003–2006 transition. It finds that power-sharing arrangements under the Sun City Agreement effectively removed checks and balances, enabling widespread looting of state assets, mining resources, and public funds. Despite the introduction of new anti-corruption laws and the creation of bodies like the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (CELC), these efforts failed due to a lack of political will, institutional dysfunction, and a reliance on donor-driven initiatives without local ownership.

The research paper examines the 2000-2001 Zambian campaign against President Frederick Chiluba's attempt to secure a third term. It details the government's use of District Administrators to intimidate opponents and the subsequent formation of the Forum Oasis—a coalition of lawyers, religious leaders, and activists. The document highlights the effectiveness of diverse mobilization tactics, such as the use of green ribbons and independent media, and provides lessons for future civic activism and the African Peer Review Mechanism.

The paper examines the necessity and design of a Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) in Zimbabwe to address decades of state-sponsored violence and impunity. It weighs the tensions between retributive and restorative justice, arguing that while political pragmatism may require conditional amnesties to secure a transition, a formal process is essential for victim redress and national healing. The authors provide a framework for a potential commission, covering its mandate, timing, and the complexities of addressing historical violence, including the 1980s gukurahundi campaign.

The Handbook for African Civil Society outlines the operational framework of the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM), a tool for intra-African governance review. It details the five stages of the review process—from self-assessment to official publication—and the continental and national structures that manage it. The guide emphasizes that CSOs must take proactive leadership 'upstream' rather than waiting for government invitations to ensure their interests are represented in National Governance Commissions and National Programmes of Action. It identifies four key review areas: democracy and political governance, economic governance, corporate governance, and socio-economic development. The document also analyzes barriers to CSO engagement, such as fear of governments, lack of resources, and internal disorganization, while offering strategies to influence power centers including the APRM Panel, the Continental Secretariat, and national parliaments.

The document details the efforts of the Open Democracy Advice Centre (ODAC) to influence South Africa's African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) process between 2004 and 2008. It argues that the South African government attempted to control the process by excluding specialist NGOs, staffing the National Governing Council (NGC) with government officials, and conducting final drafting of the Country Self-Assessment Report (CSAR) and Programme of Action (POA) behind closed doors. Despite these obstacles, ODAC successfully lobbied for the inclusion of access to information and whistleblower protection in the final binding POA, although the authors note that many of their specific detailed recommendations were omitted.

The report details the struggle of the Open Democracy Advice Centre (ODAC) to integrate transparency and anti-corruption safeguards into South Africa's African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) process. Despite facing government attempts to control the process and exclude specialized NGOs, ODAC successfully lobbied for the inclusion of access to information and whistleblower protection in the final Plan of Action (PA). The document highlights systemic issues in the South African process, including the over-representation of government officials in the National Governance Council and the opaque nature of final document revisions.

The document serves as a practical guide for Technical Research Institutes (TRIs) tasked with conducting the self-assessment phase of the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM). It details the roles of TRIs, the challenges of using the 88-page APRM questionnaire, and the necessity of balancing technical objectivity with the political sensitivities of participating African governments. The handbook offers specific methodologies for gathering expert and public opinion, vetting desk research sources, and managing the logistical and political pressures of the process. It concludes by suggesting that TRIs expand their role beyond the initial report to monitor the implementation of Programmes of Action (PoA).

The research paper examines the gap between the recommendations made by the APRM Panel of Eminent Persons and the actual Programmes of Action (PoAs) adopted by the first six reviewed African countries. It finds that most recommendations were ignored or inadequately addressed, often due to procedural failures, a lack of distinction between objectives and action items, and a tendency for governments to prioritize sovereignty over reform. The author provides a set of practical guidelines to improve future PoAs, emphasizing the need for measurable indicators, transparent costing, and better integration with existing national development plans.