Search Climate Insights Directory

The policy brief argues that market discount rates are unsuitable for evaluating long-term environmental impacts and proposes the 'equivalency principle' to determine social discount rates. This principle assumes that undeveloped and developed land of identical attributes should provide equal utility to future generations. Using a case study of a proposed seaport in Pasaia, Basque Country, the authors demonstrate that applying this principle results in lower, site-specific discount rates (between 0.96% and 3%) that would lead to the rejection of the project, whereas a market rate of 11% would justify it in some scenarios.

The document investigates the shift from top-down technocratic approaches to inclusive environmental governance within the Natura 2000 network. It proposes a three-pronged evaluation framework focusing on information quality, legitimacy, and social dynamics. Applying this to the Garate-Santa Barbara SCI in the Basque Country, the authors find that while participatory processes can reduce uncertainty and foster local relationships, they often fail to influence final political decisions, leading to participant frustration.

The paper argues that traditional top-down, uni-dimensional management of protected areas fails to capture the complexity of social-ecological systems. To address this, the authors develop a participatory integrated assessment approach that combines social multi-criteria evaluation (SMCE) with economic valuation via choice experiments and ecological valuation via bio-geographic assessment. Applying this to the Garate-Santa Barbara Natura 2000 site in the Basque Country, the study identifies a conflict between the conservation of cork oak forests and the expansion of txakoli vineyards. The results indicate that a management option increasing cork oak woodland combined with additional compensation schemes (Alternative A32) is the most globally valued and socially acceptable solution. The authors conclude that such an interdisciplinary, inclusive approach fosters social learning and creates the social capital necessary for sustainable land-use transitions.

The authors introduce the 'equivalency principle' to resolve uncertainties in setting social discount rates for natural assets. This rule posits that the present value of a naturally preserved land track should be at least equal to the market price of an identical track with permission for residential development. By applying this principle to various case studies and a specific proposed seaport in Pasaia, Gipuzkoa, the paper demonstrates that traditional cost-benefit analyses using high market discount rates often bias results in favor of development, whereas the equivalency principle typically yields much lower discount rates that favor environmental conservation.

The document outlines a comprehensive framework for implementing climate citizens' assemblies, emphasizing deliberative democracy to generate public policy recommendations. It details a five-phase process—preparation, learning, reflection/deliberation, recommendation drafting, and decision-making—while providing specific guidance on independent governance, inclusive participant selection, and the use of digital facilitation tools. The guide is based on experiences from state-level and regional assemblies in Spain, including those in Barcelona, Mallorca, and Guipúzcoa.

The document outlines a comprehensive approach to implementing deliberative democracy for climate policy, detailing a five-phase process: preparation, learning, reflection, recommendation drafting, and decision-making. It emphasizes the need for independent governance, representative sampling, and inclusive accessibility measures to ensure high-quality, legitimate public policy recommendations.

The document outlines a comprehensive approach to deliberative democracy applied to the climate crisis. It details a five-phase process—preparation, learning, reflection, recommendation drafting, and decision-making—supported by independent governance structures. The guide emphasizes inclusivity, accessibility, and the use of both digital and physical tools to ensure a representative sample of citizens can produce legitimate policy recommendations for governments and social actors.

The document outlines a comprehensive approach to implementing climate citizens' assemblies as tools for deliberative democracy. It details a five-phase process—preparation, learning, reflection/deliberation, recommendation drafting, and decision-making—while emphasizing the need for independent governance, representative sampling, and inclusive accessibility. The guide provides specific technical tools for virtual and in-person facilitation and uses examples from assemblies in Spain, Barcelona, Mallorca, and Gipuzkoa to illustrate different scales of implementation.

The document outlines a comprehensive approach to implementing climate citizens' assemblies, emphasizing deliberative democracy to generate public policy recommendations. It details a five-phase process—preparation, learning, reflection/deliberation, recommendation drafting, and decision-making—while highlighting the importance of independent governance, inclusive participant selection, and the use of specific facilitation techniques to ensure balanced participation. The guide also provides practical tools for managing virtual and physical sessions, ensuring accessibility for diverse populations, and maintaining the anonymity of participants to protect the integrity of the deliberative process.