Search Climate Insights Directory

The guide argues that fossil fuel subsidies (FFSs) are misaligned with climate and fiscal goals and proposes a three-step approach to phase them out: establishing a whole-of-government coordination mechanism, categorizing subsidies into three timelines based on risk and feasibility, and executing detailed implementation plans with clear accountability. It emphasizes that while developed countries should lead with faster reforms, developing countries may require longer timelines and more robust social protection measures to ensure a just transition.

The report argues that G20 countries have failed to meet their 2009 pledge to phase out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies, with spending reaching USD 665 billion in 2023. It introduces a categorization framework that divides subsidies into 'quick phase-out' (within 1 year), 'phase-out with a robust strategy' (2-4 years), and 'time-limited exemptions' (4+ years). Applying this to Brazil, Germany, Italy, Mexico, and South Africa, the authors find that while a significant number of measures (30-55%) can be removed quickly, the majority of fiscal value is tied to deeply embedded structural subsidies requiring sequenced reform and mitigation measures.

The NAP Global Network Strategy to 2030 aims to move developing countries from the formulation of National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) to active implementation. The strategy is built on three pillars: national-level technical support, South-South peer learning, and knowledge generation. Key priorities include supporting Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Small Island Developing States (SIDS), enhancing monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) systems, and amplifying the voices of underrepresented groups and civil society. The Network seeks approximately USD 28–30 million over the strategy period to maintain its operations and support for partner countries.

The report examines various global regulatory models for electricity revenue determination, including rate-of-return, incentive-based, performance-based, and market-based pricing. It details the technical process of Cost of Supply (CoS) studies—comprising functionalisation, classification, and allocation—and discusses the trade-offs between fixed and variable tariff charges. The document concludes that South Africa should move toward unbundled, cost-reflective tariffs supported by regular, audited CoS studies and a more robust, incentive-driven revenue determination methodology to support its transition to a wholesale market.

The report argues that KKR's use of leveraged buyouts (LBOs) often leads to financial instability and labor abuses in its portfolio companies. It documents a pattern of health and safety violations, anti-union activities, and wage theft across various sectors, including healthcare and landscaping. The document also highlights KKR's role in high-profile bankruptcies, such as Toys "R" Us and Envision Healthcare, and alleges that the firm has engaged in antitrust violations by obscuring information from the US government during mergers and acquisitions.

The document argues that Colombia's previous renewable energy auctions, which focused exclusively on price, led to social conflicts and project cancellations, particularly in La Guajira. It proposes a new framework incorporating non-price criteria—such as local employment, community benefit-sharing, and gender perspectives—into qualification and award processes. Additionally, it suggests creating a dedicated support agency and a 'joining process' (proceso de adhesión) to enable small-scale community energy projects (up to 5 MW) to access the market without competing directly with large developers.

The report finds that international reporting of military greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is generally poor, with significant under-reporting in data submitted to the UNFCCC. A comparison of five top military spenders showed that defence ministry reports for direct emissions were, on average, 95% higher than UNFCCC figures. The report highlights a critical lack of Scope 3 (supply-chain) reporting, noting that less than 10% of military carbon footprints typically appear in UNFCCC data. It identifies systemic loopholes in reporting guidelines and instances of 'greenwashing,' specifically by the UK military, and recommends mandatory, explicit military emissions reporting within National Inventory Reports.

The report highlights a systemic lack of transparent and consistent data on oil accidents across the 35 nations of the Americas. While Brazil, Canada, and the United States provide the most regular open data, significant gaps remain regarding the severity of impacts, fatalities, and responsible parties. The document emphasizes that this data scarcity obscures the true scale of environmental and social risks, particularly in sensitive regions like the Amazon, where aging infrastructure and operational failures continue to cause significant spills.

The document asserts that diversifying export markets is essential for Canada's economic prosperity, particularly to reduce vulnerability to US trade decisions. It argues that because many lucrative global markets are rapidly implementing climate policies and energy transitions, Canadian firms need transition plans to maintain market access, attract capital, and avoid being outperformed by international competitors.

A coalition of health, environmental, and academic organizations is calling on the Canadian government to join the Global Initiative on Information Integrity on Climate Change. The signatories argue that climate disinformation, perpetuated by fossil fuel and digital technology companies, endangers public health and safety, specifically citing how false narratives during summer wildfires hampered emergency responses. They urge Canada to follow the lead of Brazil, the UK, and France in committing to dismantle these information threats.

The author argues that as more jurisdictions implement border carbon adjustments (BCAs), the lack of harmonized standards for measuring, reporting, and verifying emissions could create a "trade-restrictive, costly mess." While full harmonization is deemed unrealistic due to differing national economic and political realities, the document proposes "interoperability" as a viable alternative. This approach would involve splitting emissions accounting into discrete modules, harmonizing basic reporting information, and mutually recognizing accredited verifiers. The author suggests that existing forums like the OECD's Inclusive Forum for Carbon Mitigation Approaches and the Climate Club are appropriate venues for this coordination, warning that interoperability will be harder to achieve once multiple regimes are fully operational.

The report finds that 86% of analyzed global marathons will see a decline in the odds of optimal running conditions by 2045. While elite women are more resilient to heat, elite men are most affected, particularly at the Tokyo Marathon, which is projected to see the largest decline in ideal conditions among the Abbott World Marathon Majors. The analysis highlights that the 2025 Tokyo and Berlin Marathons experienced unusual heat made two to three times more likely by climate change. Shifting race start times to sunrise is identified as a potential adaptation to increase the likelihood of optimal temperatures for most runners.

The document examines blended finance as a mechanism to bridge the gap between Canada's clean growth ambitions and its budgetary constraints. It defines blended finance as the strategic use of public funds to mitigate risks, thereby attracting private investment for large-scale infrastructure and industrial projects. The author identifies existing tools like the Canada Infrastructure Bank (CIB) and Canada Growth Fund (CGF) but argues that current efforts lack a coordinated strategy. To optimize this model, the document recommends harmonizing blended finance with other public incentives, clarifying the distinct mandates of various funding agencies to reduce transaction costs and competition, and integrating these mechanisms with a robust industrial carbon market to enhance project profitability and emission reductions.

The author contends that decarbonization is becoming the primary driver of global economic progress, citing the rapid adoption of renewables and electric vehicles in the EU, UK, and China. To remain competitive and diversify trade away from the US, Canada is urged to strengthen industrial carbon pricing, expand clean electricity grids, reduce oil and gas methane emissions, and maintain electric vehicle availability standards.

The author contends that Canada needs a strong climate competitiveness strategy to diversify trade beyond the United States and remain competitive in markets like the EU, UK, and China. The text highlights the rapid global decline in costs for solar, wind, and batteries, and suggests specific policy actions for the Canadian government, including strengthening industrial carbon pricing, expanding electricity grids, reducing methane emissions, and maintaining the federal electric vehicle mandate.

The document highlights the critical need for Canada to adapt its commercial infrastructure—including ports, roads, and airports—to climate change. It cites the 2021 atmospheric river in British Columbia as a primary example of how climate-driven disasters cause massive economic losses and supply chain disruptions. The author notes a $265 billion infrastructure deficit and calls for the federal government to mandate climate risk assessments for all publicly funded projects, upgrade existing corridors, invest in flood protections, and provide long-term funding to municipalities.

The Canadian Climate Institute warns that Canada's trade infrastructure is vulnerable to climate change, citing the 2021 B.C. floods as a primary example of the economic risks. It calls for the federal government to embed climate risk assessments into new projects, upgrade existing corridors, invest in protective infrastructure, and provide stable funding for municipalities to avoid building assets based on outdated climate data.

The EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is designed to prevent carbon leakage and encourage global decarbonisation by imposing levies on high-emitting imports. While facing criticism from BRICS nations as a protectionist barrier, the CBAM's design allows for the deduction of carbon prices already paid in the country of origin. This has led several countries, including India, China, Brazil, and Vietnam, to strategically develop or expand domestic carbon markets or taxes to ensure that carbon revenues are retained domestically rather than paid to the EU. Modelling indicates that if domestic prices reach 50% of the EU's price, countries like India could retain EUR 676 million annually.

The document identifies critical gaps in the U.S. nuclear supply chain, particularly regarding HALEU fuel, nuclear-grade graphite, and ultra-large forgings, noting a heavy reliance on Russia and China for these essential materials and services.

The Canadian Climate Institute asserts that Canada must modernize its ports by embedding clean energy and zero-emission fuels to avoid economic penalties and compete with nations like China and India. It highlights the role of ports as hubs for offshore wind and sustainable fuels, noting that the International Maritime Organization aims for net-zero shipping by 2050. The author warns that without federal support for renewable energy access, major Canadian ports risk becoming destinations for the world's most polluting ships.