Search Climate Insights Directory

The document presents a character study of a 13-year-old girl from a socially marginalised class to highlight how gender, age, and socio-economic status exacerbate vulnerability to floods. It details how floods lead to school absenteeism due to security fears, financial instability caused by rising food prices, and the burden of household chores in semi-permanent housing. The persona emphasizes that participation in disaster management or water-saving projects is contingent upon guaranteed personal safety and the ability to balance such activities with education and domestic duties.

The document presents a character study of a 28-year-old transgender female living in a shanty, designed for a group discussion on disaster management. It highlights how social discrimination, lack of literacy, and precarious housing exacerbate the impacts of floods, including health risks from drain water, food insecurity due to price hikes, and exclusion from public gatherings and official aid.

This document is a draft written reply from the South African Minister of Water and Environmental Affairs to a National Assembly question (Question 1816) asked by Mr G R Morgan (DA) regarding acid mine drainage (AMD) on the West Rand.

A draft reply from the Minister of Water and Environmental Affairs regarding a directive issued to Dipaleseng Municipality for violating the National Water Act due to pollution from wastewater treatment works.

This document is a technical report from the Chief Directorate: Water Use Authorisation Authority of the Department of Water and Sanitation of the Republic of South Africa, dated July 5, 2016. It details the water management infrastructure, water balance simulations, and environmental impacts associated with mining activities by Atha-Africa Ventures, specifically focusing on the YUCM (Yzermyn Underground Coal Mine) and surrounding areas including Kromhoek, Vaalbank, and Goedgevonden.

The document provides a detailed risk assessment and mitigation matrix for various mining-related activities, including water abstraction, infrastructure construction (roads, pipelines, and slabs), and underground mining. It focuses on the impacts on wetland systems (specifically S1, S2, S4, S7, S8, S9, S10, S12, S13, and S14) and groundwater, outlining measures such as the use of Class C liners, groundwater monitoring, and rehabilitation plans to prevent habitat transformation and pollution.

This responding statement, submitted by the Centre for Environmental Rights on behalf of BirdLife South Africa, argues that a mining right granted to William Patrick Bower Pty Ltd (WPB) should be set aside. The document contends that WPB's replying submission was filed late and introduced new, unauthorized mine layout plans and hydrogeochemical data that were not available to the decision-maker at the time of the grant. BirdLife South Africa further asserts that the mining area contains endangered ecosystems and irreplaceable biodiversity, contradicting claims made by WPB.

The document analyzes the case of Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited v Free State, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, where the court ruled that the obligation to take 'reasonable measures' to prevent pollution under the National Water Act is not limited to a party's own land and can extend to land owned or used by others. This occurred in the context of managing groundwater and preventing acid mine drainage in the KOSH basin, where several mining companies were directed to share the costs of pumping and treating water at defunct mines to protect active operations.

The court found the Stilfontein Gold Mining Company (SGM) and its four directors guilty of contempt of court for ignoring directives to pump underground water to prevent pollution and flooding. The judge rejected the directors' defense that their mass resignation and the company's financial status absolved them of responsibility, emphasizing that directors cannot 'walk away' from environmental obligations. However, this contempt order was subsequently set aside on appeal in Kebble v The Minister of Water Affairs and Forestry 2007 JDR 0872 (SCA).

Civil society organisations are urging the South African government to release a suppressed report by a Team of Experts (TOE) regarding acid mine drainage. They argue that the continued non-disclosure of this report undermines transparency and prevents the public from assessing the urgency of pollution affecting the Vaal and Crocodile River systems.

The case Rex v Marshall & Another [1951] confirmed the convictions of the manager and resident engineer of Natal Cambrian Collieries Ltd for violating Regulation 7(2) of the Mines and Works Regulations, 1937. The court found that the mine had allowed water containing injurious matter to escape without treatment, contaminating a stream that affected lower-lying farms. The court rejected defense arguments that the regulation was void for vagueness, unreasonableness, or ultra vires, ruling that 'injurious' water is that which is unfit for human or animal consumption, dangerous to animal life, or unsuitable for irrigation.

The report identifies critical failures in South African water governance and provides recommendations for civil society to intervene and improve the management of water resources.

The document details the environmental and social costs of coal-power generation in South Africa, specifically focusing on the Kusile power station. It highlights that water-related externalities for Kusile range from R0.95 to R1.86 per kWh, driven largely by water use in generation and mining. The text argues that the Draft Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) 2016 misrepresents the total cost of coal by ignoring these externalities. It further notes that coal mining and power generation consume 3% and 2% of South Africa's water respectively, with severe regional impacts in the Upper Olifants. The report emphasizes the long-term costs of acid-mine drainage and the disproportionate health and water-security burdens placed on poor communities, concluding that a decarbonised energy future would require four times less water by 2050 and create more jobs than the coal-reliant base case.

The document serves as a practical manual for South African citizens to enforce environmental rights against mining operations. It details indicators of illegal mining activity, the legal framework governing environmental crimes, and a step-by-step procedure for filing criminal charges with the police. It also explains the subsequent prosecution process and the legal protections available to whistleblowing employees.

The report documents a pervasive 'environment of fear' in South Africa's mining communities, where activists face physical attacks, death threats, and state-led harassment. It details how local municipalities impose extra-legal restrictions on protests, police use excessive force and arbitrary arrests, and mining companies employ SLAPP suits and social media campaigns to silence opposition. The document argues that these actions violate South African constitutional and international human rights obligations regarding freedom of expression, assembly, and the right to a healthy environment.

The document asserts that natural gas is not a clean energy source, detailing how its production, transport, and combustion cause significant environmental degradation and health issues. It highlights the potency of methane leaks and the high carbon emissions from LNG and gas-to-power plants, particularly in the South African context. The author recommends a holistic lifecycle impact assessment to counter the misconception that gas is a viable strategy for reducing emissions.

The report by the Fair Steel Coalition examines the systemic environmental and human rights abuses linked to ArcelorMittal and Ternium. It identifies 'sacrifice zones' where marginalized communities of color face severe pollution and health risks. The document details case studies of land dispossession in Liberia, air and water contamination in South Africa and Brazil, and a pattern of violence and enforced disappearances of environmental defenders in Mexico. It concludes that corporate sustainability policies are superficial and calls for mandatory due diligence, a just transition in steel production, and accountability for human rights violations.

The document argues that tracking substances of concern is essential for EU competitiveness, product sustainability, and the viability of the circular economy. It calls for the European Commission to maintain reporting requirements in upcoming delegated acts under the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) to protect recyclers, water service providers, and public health.

The document identifies over 59 hazardous substances in carpets sold in the EU, including carcinogens and endocrine disruptors, which pose risks to consumers, workers, and the environment. It highlights a regulatory gap where many of these substances are not restricted and notes that recycled materials often face lower health standards than new materials. The briefing argues that these toxics hinder the circular economy by contaminating recycled products and complicating mechanical recycling. It recommends that the European Commission implement a product-specific carpet directive, establish Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) schemes, and introduce a comprehensive EU ecolabel to phase out hazardous chemicals and promote non-toxic, recyclable design.

The report identifies that carpets sold in the EU can contain 59 harmful substances, including carcinogens and endocrine disruptors, which pose risks to human health and the environment. These chemicals hinder recycling efforts and contaminate water and air during production and disposal. The document advocates for stricter EU regulations, the implementation of extended producer responsibility (EPR), and the adoption of ecodesign standards to eliminate hazardous substances and promote a circular economy in the carpet industry.