Search Climate Insights Directory

The Reinventing Fire transportation analysis evaluates efficiency pathways for U.S. autos, heavy trucks, and airplanes through 2050. It distinguishes between 'Improved Design' (technological upgrades) and 'Improved Use' (reducing vehicle-miles traveled), while incorporating a consumer adoption model for high-efficiency vehicles and a supply-cost model for inedible biofuels. The methodology integrates these findings into an economy-wide model to calculate net present value savings, estimating a total net saving of $3,757 billion in 2009 dollars.

The paper proposes a 'lightweighting first' strategy to drastically reduce tractive load in automobiles, trucks, and aircraft, making electric and hydrogen powertrains more affordable and efficient. It argues that integrating advanced materials like carbon-fiber composites with smarter logistics and urban planning can lead to an oil-free U.S. transportation sector by 2050, providing significant economic savings and carbon emission reductions.

The executive summary of 'Winning the Oil Endgame' argues that displacing all oil used in the United States would be more profitable than continuing to purchase it. The proposed roadmap involves doubling oil efficiency—primarily through ultralight vehicle design—developing a domestic biofuels industry, and utilizing natural gas and hydrogen as substitutes. The authors suggest that an investment of $180 billion over a decade could result in an annual gross economic benefit of $130 billion by 2025. To accelerate this transition, the document recommends policies such as 'feebates' for vehicles, scrap-and-replace programs for low-income citizens, and federal loan guarantees for automotive retooling.

The document presents a series of supplemental tables mapping the climate change adaptation landscape in ASEAN countries. It identifies key decision-making bodies, such as Cambodia's National Climate Change Committee and Vietnam's National Committee of Climate Change, and lists guiding policies like the Thailand Climate Change Master Plan 2013–2050. The tables also catalogue agricultural research efforts, including the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change Agriculture and Food Security, and detail funding sources, noting a heavy reliance on external donors in countries like Cambodia and Myanmar, while highlighting specific financial constraints in Malaysia.

The document outlines a technical framework for calculating fuel use across various truck types—including tractor-trailers, straight trucks, and cargo vans—using data from the Freight Analysis Framework (FAF) and the Vehicle Inventory and Use Survey (VIUS). It establishes baseline fuel economies (e.g., 5.8 mpg for tractor-trailers) and projects improvements by 2025 based on technology packages such as aerodynamic devices and hybrid-electric powertrains. Additionally, it applies these methodologies to estimate the current fuel use and future savings for the fleets of UPS, FedEx, PepsiCo, The Coca-Cola Company, and Walmart.

The Urban Community Resilience Assessment (UCRA) is a bottom-up planning tool that integrates local neighborhood knowledge with city-wide resilience strategies. Piloted in Rio de Janeiro, Surat, and Semarang, the tool uses three dimensions—city-level vulnerability, neighborhood resilience potential, and household capacities—to identify infrastructure gaps and social needs. While the UCRA promotes inclusive planning and provides detailed local baselines, pilot results highlighted challenges including high costs, time-intensive methodology, and a lack of political leadership.

The World Resources Institute developed the Urban Community Resilience Assessment (UCRA) to help city planners identify specific resilience needs among urban populations, particularly the urban poor. Piloted in Rio de Janeiro and Porto Alegre, the tool evaluates vulnerability context, community resilience, and individual capacity. Findings indicate that physical infrastructure, such as early warning systems, does not automatically result in individual behavior change or increased personal resilience. The paper argues that effective urban planning requires participatory engagement with residents to avoid exacerbating existing vulnerabilities and to foster social capital and positive resilience habits.