Search Climate Insights Directory

Friends of the Earth International rejects the Roundtable on Responsible Soy (RTRS), claiming it provides a "façade of sustainability" for agribusinesses and energy companies while failing to address the systemic impacts of industrial soy. The document highlights how soy expansion leads to deforestation, biodiversity loss, human rights violations, and increased food insecurity. It specifically criticizes the promotion of genetically modified (GM) soy, noting substantial increases in herbicide use in Brazil and the United States. The statement argues that the RTRS ignores indirect regional and global impacts, such as the displacement of agriculture into primary forests and the pollution caused by intensive livestock production in Europe. To address these issues, the organization calls for structural land reforms, reduced global demand for meat and dairy, and an end to large-scale agrofuel production.

The International Federation of Friends of the Earth rejects the Round Table on Responsible Soy (RTRS), claiming it provides a facade of sustainability for multinational corporations while ignoring the systemic impacts of industrial soy monocultures. The document details how soy expansion leads to biodiversity loss, climate change, human rights violations, and food insecurity. It specifically criticizes the promotion of genetically modified (GM) soy, noting significant increases in pesticide use in Brazil and the US. The text argues that demand is driven by intensive livestock farming and biofuels, and calls for structural land reforms, reduced meat consumption, and a shift toward organic and local agriculture.

Friends of the Earth calls for the resignation of EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson, citing a pattern of ignoring scientific recommendations, violating legal mandates regarding greenhouse gas emissions, and retaliating against whistleblowers.

The report argues that GM crops provide no ecological, social, or economic benefits. It highlights that herbicide-tolerant (HT) varieties promote the development of resistant weeds, leading to increased pesticide application in the US, Brazil, and Argentina. The document further asserts that GM crops do not increase yields or food security, as most are used for animal feed or biofuels rather than human consumption, and that seed monopolies increase costs for farmers.

The document asserts that the global expansion of genetically modified (GM) crops showed signs of stagnation by 2006, failing to outperform conventional crops in yield or reduce pesticide use. It highlights that GM varieties—primarily maize, cotton, soy, and rapeseed—have not alleviated hunger or poverty and have often negatively impacted small-scale farmers in countries such as India, China, and Colombia due to increased costs and secondary pests. Furthermore, it notes public opposition in the European Union and the inability of the industry to prevent the illegal spread of transgenic rice across multiple continents.

The IPEN Dubai Declaration outlines a comprehensive strategy to eliminate persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and other toxic chemicals by 2020. It calls for the adoption of the precautionary principle, the 'no data, no market' rule, and the 'polluter pays' principle. The declaration emphasizes protecting vulnerable populations, including children and indigenous communities, and advocates for a just transition for workers. It further urges the expansion of international agreements like the Stockholm and Rotterdam Conventions and the establishment of a dedicated chemical safety focal area within the Global Environment Facility (GEF).

The report asserts that ten years after the first major GM crop plantings in 1996, these technologies have not reduced hunger or poverty and have instead increased pesticide use and corporate control over seeds. It highlights the dominance of Monsanto, Syngenta, and Bayer, noting that over 95% of commercial GM plants are limited to maize, soy, and cotton. The text details failures in various regions, including poor yields of GM sweet potatoes in Kenya and farmer debt in India, while accusing Monsanto of using corruption in Indonesia and aggressive legal tactics against farmers in the US.

The document critiques the 'biotechnological revolution' in agriculture, specifically the role of Monsanto and the ISAAA in promoting GM crops. It argues that the industry has used deceptive marketing, bribery, and political influence to bypass regulations and establish dominance over the global seed market. The report claims that GM crops have not reduced poverty or hunger, have increased pesticide use, and have led to land concentration and the erosion of farmers' rights, particularly in the Global South.

The document outlines the challenges of global chemicals management, the existing legal frameworks, and the proposed Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM) aimed at minimizing adverse effects on health and environment by 2020.

The document introduces Environmental Improvement Zones (EIZs) as a community-based framework for implementing environmental strategies in Winnipeg. It outlines baseline data and recommended activities across seven key areas: climate change/air quality, urban energy, land use, transportation, waste management, water management, and pesticide use. The guide details pilot results from three diverse neighbourhoods—Whyte Ridge, Riverview, and West Broadway—demonstrating that environmental priorities vary significantly by socio-economic profile and urban layout. It argues that a neighbourhood-scale approach using community-based social marketing (CBSM) is more effective for long-term behaviour change than city-wide, 'one size fits all' programming.

A coalition of eighteen environmental organizations argues that the Bush Administration's proposed FIFRA amendments fail to effectively implement the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs). The groups claim the proposal denies the EPA effective authority to ban additional POPs pesticides, introduces burdensome cost-benefit requirements that contradict the treaty's precautionary principle, and attempts to limit Congressional regulatory power through an unfounded constitutional interpretation. They recommend that implementing legislation adopt a health-based standard of "reasonable certainty of no harm," use international ban decisions as the default for domestic regulation, and ensure the U.S. regulatory process parallels the international decision-making process.

A coalition of environmental and health organizations rejected the EPA's February 25, 2004, draft amendments to FIFRA, arguing the bill fails to adequately implement the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs). The groups contend the draft ignores health-based standards, fails to align domestic regulation with international POPs listings, and lacks a transparent public comment process. They further argue that the administration is using the bill to advance a "fringe constitutional theory" regarding the non-delegation of power to international bodies.

The report claims that the first ten years of GM crop commercialization were a 'resounding failure', noting that promises of cheaper, higher-quality food and the solution to global hunger have not materialized. It highlights the dominance of Monsanto, the failure of the first GM tomato, and the rise of global opposition due to concerns over genetic contamination, biodiversity loss, and corporate control of seeds.

The report analyzes the agricultural sector in Central America, noting a trend where imports grow faster than exports and a heavy reliance on external technology for dynamic crops. It identifies significant environmental degradation caused by the high use of pesticides in banana and cantaloupe production and carbon emissions from sugar cane burning. The authors argue that while the region has extensive environmental legislation, it is rarely enforced. To promote sustainable development, the document recommends establishing non-distorting support mechanisms, negotiating special treatment for 'sustainable' products in trade agreements like CAFTA and the FTAA, and creating a General System of Green Preferences (SIGPREVERDE) for developing countries.

The report contrasts ecological farming with chemical and GM agriculture, asserting that the latter degrades soil and harms the food chain. It cites historical and modern evidence that biodiverse, organic methods increase crop yields and improve the health of plants, animals, and humans, while GM crops are linked to lower yields, increased herbicide use, and potential soil fertility damage.

The document highlights the vulnerability of children and fetuses to pesticide exposure, noting that standard safety assessments often ignore the effects of chemical mixtures and hormone disruptors. It criticizes the UK government for failing to extend strict pesticide limits—currently only applicable to processed baby foods—to all foods, and calls for a transition toward organic farming and pesticide-free produce in schools.

The report finds that while cloth and leather exports in Pakistan generate significant pollution—including toxic chemical runoff and carcinogenic waste—the costs of implementing cleaner production technologies are modest at both the macro and micro levels. For cloth production, mitigation could reduce pollution loads by up to 91%, with costs representing only 0.0011% of the 1996-97 GNP. For leather tanning, mitigation could reduce pollution by 66%, with net costs (after chromium recovery) amounting to 0.0025% of GNP. The authors argue that meeting international environmental standards is a 'win-win' that ensures market access and improves public health, urging the Pakistani government to proactively provide information on global standards to exporters.

The paper analyzes the cotton commodity chain in Pakistan, highlighting the severe environmental degradation caused by heavy pesticide use in farming and untreated effluent discharge in textile processing. It argues that the transition to sustainable alternatives, such as Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and organic cotton, is hindered by a failing government-driven governance system in agriculture and a buyer-driven system in apparel. The author suggests that a successful transition requires strengthening government research and extension networks and engaging private pesticide companies in a collaborative framework.

The report examines the regulatory landscape for domestically prohibited goods (DPGs), categorized into chemicals, pharmaceuticals, consumer products, and hazardous wastes. It details a mix of information exchange mechanisms, voluntary codes, and legally binding treaties, noting that while chemicals are relatively well-covered, significant gaps remain for consumer products and certain pharmaceuticals. The document highlights the challenges faced by developing countries, including lack of technical capacity and the risk of importing hazardous substances that are banned in developed nations.

The document analyzes the fragmented nature of U.S. export laws for hazardous substances, noting that there is "no single, unified approach" across different statutes. It details specific requirements for notification, consent, labelling, and reporting under acts such as TSCA, RCRA, and FIFRA, while also outlining the restrictions on exporting unapproved new drugs and radioactive materials. Additionally, it includes an appendix on the Basel Convention's framework for transboundary movements of hazardous waste.