Search Climate Insights Directory

The document argues that superhot rock geothermal could be a gamechanger for Texas's energy grid, noting that just 1% of the state's resource could meet 50% of its 2023 electricity consumption. It emphasizes the technology's low land footprint and its ability to leverage existing oil and gas subsurface expertise.

The document highlights that just 1% of Türkiye's superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 594 GW of energy capacity, potentially replacing all coal and gas used for electricity production and meeting the country's projected 2050 electricity demand of 609,503 GWh. It argues that this technology would enhance energy security by reducing dependence on coal (58% imported) and natural gas (98% imported), while requiring significantly less land (12 km² per 1 GW) than solar, wind, or biomass.

The document highlights that just 1% of the UK's superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 6 GW of capacity, meeting 17% of the country's 2023 electricity demand. This resource could potentially replace all coal and oil and 33% of the gas used for 2021 electricity production, reducing emissions by approximately 25 megatonnes of CO2eq. Additionally, it could replace 15% of the UK's gas imports and requires significantly less land (12 km² per 1 GW) than other energy sources like solar or wind.

The document outlines the potential of superhot rock geothermal energy in Utah, noting that just 1% of the state's resource could provide 327 GW of energy capacity. It argues that this technology offers a low land-use footprint and a transition pathway for oil and gas workers.

The document highlights that just 1% of Vietnam's estimated superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 425 GW of energy capacity, potentially replacing all coal and gas used for electricity production and reducing emissions by approximately 142 megatonnes of CO2eq. It argues that this energy source offers a low land-use footprint and could reduce Vietnam's dependence on coal imports from Australia and Indonesia.

The document highlights that just 1% of Yemen's superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 1,052 GW of energy capacity, far exceeding the country's 2021 electricity consumption of 2,913 GWh. It argues that this energy source could offer a low-land-footprint, reliable alternative to fossil fuels, supporting desalination, hydrogen production, and economic growth.

The document discusses the application of extreme event attribution to understand the role of climate change in specific weather events, using two Indian case studies to illustrate the complexities of vulnerability and the masking effects of aerosols.

This document consists of the Appellants' Practice Note and Heads of Argument filed in the Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa on 8 May 2020. The Appellants, including the Global Environmental Trust and the Mfolozi Community Environmental Justice Organisation, are appealing a High Court judgment that found in favour of Tendele Coal Mining (Pty) Ltd. The appeal centers on whether Tendele's mining operations at the Somkhele Mine were conducted lawfully without specific environmental authorisations under the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA), municipal land use approvals, waste management licences, and permits for the relocation of community graves.

The document consists of a series of legal and administrative records regarding a land-use change application for Portion 1 of the farm Yzermyn 96 HT in Mpumalanga, South Africa. The application, submitted by Atha-Africa Ventures (Pty) Ltd, sought to rezone the land from agricultural to 'special' use to allow for mining and related activities. The process involved multiple objections from environmental organizations and landowners, a dismissal by a local planning tribunal based on a lack of locus standi, a subsequent appeal, and a final approval by the Gert Sibande District Municipal Planning Tribunal on 29 April 2019.

The Department of Economic Development, Environment and Tourism (LEDET) of the Limpopo Province refused an Environmental Authorisation (EA) for the proposed Meletse Iron Ore Mining project. The project, proposed by Aquila Steel (S Africa) (Pty) Ltd, would have involved an open pit mining operation and associated infrastructure on the farms Donkerpoort 448 KQ and Randstephne 455 KQ. The refusal was based on the determination that ecological, visual, and traffic impacts could not be mitigated and that the project conflicted with required land use for the site.

The guideline establishes a standard directive for applicants of prospecting rights, mining rights, or mining permits to conduct and report on consultations with affected parties. It defines 'consultation' as a two-way communication process and 'community' as historically disadvantaged persons with rights in a specific area. The document outlines the specific legislative timelines for notification and the detailed contents required in consultation reports, including the identification of landowners, traditional authorities, and the assessment of socio-economic and biophysical impacts.

The guideline details the mandatory components of an EIA and EMP for mining right applications in South Africa. The EIA must establish baseline environmental data, identify potential impacts—including acid mine drainage and socio-economic effects—and evaluate alternative land uses. The EMP must outline environmental objectives for mine closure, implementation programmes for mitigation, emergency procedures, and financial provisions for rehabilitation. Applicants are required to engage interested and affected parties and provide specialist reports as appendices to ensure the mining operation does not result in unacceptable pollution or ecological degradation.

This document is a legal judgement from the High Court of South Africa (North Gauteng Local Division) regarding a case brought by the Libradene Residents Association against the Minister of Mineral Resources and others. The residents sought to stop mining activities in the Libradene area, arguing that the mining was unlawful, caused significant environmental and structural damage to their properties, and violated their constitutional rights to a healthy environment and property. The court examined the validity of mining rights granted under the Minerals Act of 1991 and the subsequent Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA) of 2002, ultimately focusing on whether the mining operations complied with legal requirements and environmental regulations.

A notice from the Municipal Appeal Authority of the Dr Pixley Ka Isaka Seme Local Municipality regarding a land development appeal for Portion 1 of the farm Yzermyn 96 IT in Mpumalanga Province. The notice establishes a written appeal process involving the Centre for Environmental Rights, the Gert Sibande District Joint Municipal Planning Tribunal, and Atha-Africa Ventures (Pty) Ltd.

The document details a dispute involving BHP Billiton and the Optimum Colliery, focusing on the conversion of 'old order rights' under the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA). Landowners Jacobus Oosthuysen and the Jaco Oosthuysen Trust appealed the conversion of these rights, citing a total lack of notification and public participation. The case highlights systemic failures in the Environmental Management Programme (EMP), specifically the failure to assess alternative land uses, the 'no go' option, and cumulative impacts. Additionally, the appellants alleged that the mining company engaged in illegal mining activities not approved in the EMP.

This document contains the heads of argument for an application for leave to appeal a High Court decision regarding the legality of mining operations conducted by Tendele Coal Mining (Pty) Limited. The applicants argue that the mining company failed to obtain necessary environmental authorizations under the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA), violated town planning legislation for new mining areas, operated without a required waste management license, and unlawfully relocated traditional graves.

The Voice Community Representative Council, an NPO representing communities in the Dr. Pixley Ka Isaka Seme Municipality, issued a memorandum of grievances to the Centre for Environmental Rights (CER) on July 26, 2018. The document accuses CER and its coalition of using environmental protection as a pretext to block the Yzermyn mining project by Atha Africa Ventures, thereby perpetuating economic and racial inequality and poverty for the local black community.

The document examines a 1955 legal case where the court ruled that conditions of title registered against agricultural holdings in Walkerville constrained the respondents' ability to conduct slate quarrying, despite the respondents holding the mineral rights.

The Matzikama Municipality issued a decision on 24 July 2020 approving the rezoning of a portion of Farm Geelwal Karoo No 262 from Agriculture zone I to Industrial zone III to allow for mining activities and a mineral processing plant.

The document details a conflict over the construction of a tailings dam on the farm Blinkwater 820 LR by Potgietersrust Platinums Ltd (PPL). It highlights failures in public participation, as the decision to use the land was authorized in 2003 under the Minerals Act 50 of 1991 before community consultations began in 2005. The case raises critical issues regarding the adequacy of compensation paid to the Sekuruwe community, the transparency of negotiations, and the legal relationship between the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA) and the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA).