Search Climate Insights Directory

The document explains the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) as a voluntary process for African governments and citizens to assess governance and implement reforms. It outlines a five-step methodology for civil society organisations (CSOs) to create effective written submissions: identifying a focused issue, gathering evidence from diverse sources, developing persuasive arguments, building consensus through circulation, and submitting to the correct official bodies. The guide emphasises that evidence-backed submissions are more impactful than oral presentations and provides examples of successful advocacy by groups in Uganda and South Africa.

The report finds that while many governments have established legal frameworks for freedom of information, actual practice lags behind, particularly regarding proactive information release and meaningful public participation. It argues that environmental access rights are human rights and that their implementation improves the legitimacy and quality of environmental decisions. The document identifies hurdles such as vested interests and lack of capacity, and provides recommendations for governments and advocates to foster a culture of openness and accountability in environmental governance.

The document presents evidence of the existence and vulnerability of the Cacataibo people in voluntary isolation in the Ucayali region of Peru. It combines numerous eyewitness testimonies of sightings and footprints with expert analysis on the risks posed by seismic exploration in 'Lote 107', arguing that such activities threaten the health, food security, and physical survival of these isolated groups.

The Male’ Declaration, adopted by Small Island Developing States in 2007, argues that climate change threatens fundamental human rights and calls for urgent global action to limit temperature rises to below 2°C and greenhouse gas concentrations to under 450ppm. It specifically requests that the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights study the effects of climate change on human rights and that the UN Human Rights Council convene a debate on the subject in March 2009.

The petition argues that the arbitration between Biwater Gauf Tanzania Limited and Tanzania transcends a private commercial dispute because it concerns the privatization of water services, which is directly linked to basic human rights and the UN Millennium Declaration goal of increasing access to safe drinking water. The author contends that the public nature of the dispute and its potential as a model for poverty alleviation in Africa necessitate a transparent process that permits citizen participation.

The document examines the 'resource curse' in Africa, focusing on how corruption in the mining and oil sectors undermines human development. It contrasts 'state-centred' theories of corruption with 'corporate corruption' and 'state capture,' where companies illicitly influence policy. The author argues that transparency initiatives like the EITI are only partial solutions and that litigation is often hindered by political will and complex international contracts. The paper concludes that combating corruption must be balanced with broader goals of social justice and environmental protection to truly benefit African citizens.

The Peruvian government approved an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in August 2007 for the 2D Seismic Project for Block 107, allowing the Canadian-headquartered company Petrolífera to conduct oil and gas exploration using dynamite blasts. This project superimposes 50% of proposed territorial reserves intended to protect the Cacataibo peoples in voluntary isolation (Camanos). Despite requests dating back to 1999, the Peruvian government has failed to establish these reserves. The EIA process is criticized for lacking transparency, ignoring 65 observations from INRENA, and failing to provide adequate measures to prevent forced contact, which historically leads to illness and death for isolated indigenous groups. In response, FENACOCA, IBC, and CIEL are seeking precautionary measures from the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR).

The document details the risks to the Cacataibo people in voluntary isolation in Peru's Central Jungle due to the approval of the 2D Seismic Project Lot 107. It highlights the failure of the Peruvian state to establish proposed territorial reserves and the dangers of using dynamite for seismic exploration in these areas. The briefing calls for precautionary measures from the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to prevent forced contact and protect the life and integrity of the isolated groups.

The document examines how international investment agreements (IIAs), particularly bilateral investment treaties (BITs), can undermine domestic public policy and state sovereignty by allowing foreign investors to bypass national courts through international arbitration. It highlights cases in South Africa, the US, and Canada where environmental, social, and human rights policies were challenged. The guide argues for stronger parliamentary scrutiny of these treaties to ensure they do not conflict with constitutional obligations or human rights.

The document argues that Africa's regional integration efforts have largely failed because they were based on an ideological Pan-Africanist model that prioritised politics over economics and ignored the necessity of domestic stability. The author contends that continental success is impossible without first achieving national success through bold economic reforms, the rule of law, and democratisation. While some Regional Economic Communities (RECs) like Comesa and the EAC show promise, the paper highlights systemic hurdles including overlapping memberships, weak institutional capacity, and a lack of political will to cede sovereignty. It advocates for 'developmental regionalism'—focusing on infrastructure and supply-side constraints—and an outward-looking approach that attracts foreign direct investment (FDI) and integrates Africa into the global market.

The report documents a pattern of environmental destruction, human rights abuses, and community resistance associated with Barrick Gold's operations across several continents. It highlights specific cases of water depletion, toxic pollution, and violent police repression of protesters, while critiquing the lack of binding legal frameworks in Canada to hold its mining corporations accountable abroad.

The report analyzes the proliferation of small arms and light weapons (SALW) in the DRC, CAR, and Chad, linking arms availability to historical instability, ethnic conflict, and poor governance. It assesses various disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) efforts, noting that while some institutional frameworks exist, they are often undermined by a lack of resources, political mistrust, and the persistence of non-state armed groups. The author argues that sustainable peace requires integrating disarmament with socio-economic development and regional cooperation.

The ICSID Tribunal granted five non-governmental organizations permission to file a joint amicus curiae submission in the case of Suez et al. v. Argentina, finding that the dispute involves significant public interest regarding water and sewage services in Buenos Aires. While the Tribunal affirmed the suitability of the petitioners based on their expertise in human rights and the environment, it denied their request for unrestricted access to arbitration documents, ruling that they possessed sufficient information from other sources to provide the necessary perspectives without the record.

The document examines the rapid expansion of private security in Africa, distinguishing between private security companies (PSCs) and private military companies (PMCs). It identifies drivers of this growth, including the end of the Cold War, globalization, and state fragility, while highlighting the risks to human rights and state sovereignty. The author argues that the current lack of regulation makes the sector a potential threat, particularly in fragile states, and calls for comprehensive research to inform new regulatory frameworks.

The document reports on a roundtable discussion regarding South Africa's 42 bilateral investment treaties (BITs). It highlights the tension between protecting foreign investment and maintaining the state's ability to regulate for public interest, particularly regarding Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) policies. Key concerns include the risk of lawsuits over expropriation, the lack of transparency in arbitration, and the need to review and amend treaties to align with domestic development objectives.

The IISD Model International Agreement on Investment for Sustainable Development proposes a new legal framework for foreign investment. It moves away from traditional bilateral investment treaties by introducing binding investor obligations, including mandatory environmental and social impact assessments, anti-corruption requirements, and adherence to human rights and labour standards. The model establishes a structured institutional framework featuring a Conference of the Parties, a permanent Dispute Settlement Body with an appellate division to ensure legal consistency, and a Legal Assistance Centre for developing countries. It explicitly protects the 'inherent rights of states' to regulate for public welfare and sustainable development, while providing a mechanism to abrogate investor rights in cases of corruption or persistent non-compliance.

The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) presents a model international investment agreement that shifts the focus from purely protecting foreign capital to integrating sustainable development, human rights, and environmental protections. The guide proposes a comprehensive framework of rights and obligations for investors, host states, and home states, including mandatory environmental and social impact assessments, anti-corruption measures, and a reformed dispute resolution mechanism featuring an appellate body and increased transparency.

The report analyzes the Democratic Republic of Congo's transition toward national elections scheduled for 2006. It details the legislative progress, the operational challenges of the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC), and the critical role of security sector reform. The authors identify significant security threats from armed groups in Ituri, North Kivu, and Katanga, as well as political tensions involving the UDPS. Three scenarios are presented: a successful transition under the current '1+4' leadership, a transition with new leadership, or a total breakdown of order.

A group of medical professionals and scientists argue that Reed Elsevier's ownership of The Lancet is contradictory to its role as a promoter of arms fairs, specifically the Defence Systems and Equipment International (DSEi) event. The authors contend that promoting arms sales, including cluster bombs and small arms, violates the medical principle of 'do no harm' and contradicts Reed Elsevier's commitment to the UN Global Compact.

The briefing argues that ZANU-PF has used its two-thirds parliamentary majority to entrench power through constitutional amendments and the 'securitisation' of civilian institutions. It highlights 'Operation Murambatsvina' as a violent urban crackdown that displaced hundreds of thousands of people, which the author suggests was politically motivated to crush opposition support. The report details the dominance of the Zezuru faction within the government and the severe economic collapse of the country, characterized by hyperinflation and a contracting GDP. It concludes that the regime's reliance on military force and patronage networks undermines democracy and human rights, while international efforts for reform, including South African 'quiet diplomacy' and Chinese engagement, have failed to produce a positive transition.