Search Climate Insights Directory

Friends of the Earth welcomes the Supreme Court's decision to review a 2003 EPA ruling that denied the agency's authority to regulate carbon dioxide as a pollutant. The organization argues that the lack of regulation has coincided with a 16 percent increase in global warming emissions since 1990 and contributed to severe weather events and economic losses, such as the $57.6 billion in insurance losses from 2005 hurricanes.

The report assesses the environmental consequences of the ASEAN-China Free Trade Agreement (ACFTA) on the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS). It finds that while trade has increased, a third of the trade volume involves highly polluting sectors, with much of this pollution originating in China. In Cambodia, imports of polluting goods from China have improved the local environment at the expense of China's, while the increase in natural resource-based exports threatens resource sustainability due to weak regulation. The author concludes that the ACFTA's lack of environmental cooperation provisions is a significant policy shortcoming.

The report assesses how the ASEAN-China Free Trade Agreement (ACFTA) has influenced trade flows and environmental quality in the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS). Using a trade-environment matrix, the authors find that while two-thirds of trade is in low-pollution sectors, a third is in highly polluting sectors, with China as the primary producer of these goods. In Cambodia, the agreement has increased imports of polluting goods from China, which the authors describe as an environmental 'gain' for Cambodia at the expense of China's environment. However, the report highlights severe risks of natural resource depletion in Cambodia, specifically deforestation driven by wood and rubber exports, and overfishing. The authors conclude that the ACFTA lacks environmental provisions, which is a significant shortcoming in regional economic policy.

The report analyzes the impact of Executive Order 13422, which modifies the regulatory process by placing political appointees as gatekeepers in federal agencies and expanding the review of non-binding guidance documents by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). It contends that the order shifts the focus of regulation toward addressing 'market failures' and aggregate cost-benefit analyses, potentially delaying critical safety and health protections and increasing political interference in science-based regulatory processes.

A collective statement signed by over 62 prominent scientists (and later 15,000 others) alleging that the George W. Bush administration systematically disregarded scientific objectivity. The authors cite specific instances of censorship at the EPA and other agencies, the appointment of unqualified individuals to advisory boards, and the misrepresentation of climate change data. They propose legislative reforms to forbid censorship of scientific studies and ensure public access to government research.

Friends of the Earth calls for the resignation of EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson, citing a pattern of ignoring scientific recommendations, violating legal mandates regarding greenhouse gas emissions, and retaliating against whistleblowers.

The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) conducted a survey of 1,586 EPA scientists and interviews to document political interference. Findings reveal that 60% of respondents experienced interference, often from political appointees and the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The report details the suppression of climate change and mercury pollution research, barriers to media communication, and a decline in job satisfaction and resources, concluding with recommendations for structural reforms to restore scientific integrity.

Earthjustice calls for the resignation of EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson, citing a rebellion by 10,000 agency employees who accuse him of ignoring scientific advice to appease political interests. The document highlights specific failures, including the refusal to allow California to regulate vehicle greenhouse gas emissions and delays in obeying a Supreme Court order to regulate greenhouse gases. It further notes congressional investigations into conflicts of interest on EPA advisory panels and contrasts Johnson's inaction with the tenure of former administrator Christine Todd Whitman.

The document examines the tension between the economic potential of exporting medicinal plants and spices in Lao PDR and the resulting environmental pressures. It identifies systemic failures in harvesting and regulation while proposing a framework for sustainable management and legal enforcement.

The document details the aftermath of the 2008 Kingston disaster, where over 1 billion gallons of coal ash slurry were released. It tracks TVA's legal battles, the health impacts on local communities and cleanup workers, the disposal of ash in Perry County, Alabama, and the prolonged struggle to compel the EPA to finalize federal coal ash disposal regulations by 2014.

The policy brief examines China's increasing foreign direct investment (FDI) and trade in the Mekong region, driven by its domestic demand for natural resources. It highlights the role of Chinese state-owned enterprises and financial institutions in filling an investment vacuum left by international financial institutions. While noting the potential for economic growth, the document warns of environmental and social risks due to poor regulatory enforcement and the lack of adherence to international sustainability standards by Chinese firms.

China is rapidly increasing its foreign direct investment (FDI) in the Mekong region to secure natural resources for its industrial growth. Driven by the 'Going Out' strategy, Chinese state-owned enterprises are filling an investment vacuum left by International Financial Institutions in hydropower, mining, and agribusiness. While this provides capital and infrastructure, it poses environmental and social risks due to a lack of compliance with international sustainability standards and poor local regulatory enforcement in Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam.

A 2007 survey of EPA scientists conducted by the Union of Concerned Scientists and Iowa State University reveals widespread political interference, suppression of scientific findings, and restricted communication with the public. The findings indicate that a majority of respondents experienced political pressure, often originating from the White House Office of Management and Budget and commercial interests, leading to decreased job satisfaction and concerns over the agency's overall effectiveness in protecting human health and the environment.

The World Resources Institute (WRI) reported total revenue of $27,765,582 and total expenses of $28,102,119 for the 2008 tax year. The organization operates three primary program services: the Climate, Energy and Pollution Program, the Institutions and Governance Program, and the People and Ecosystems Program. WRI maintains a global presence with activities and grantmaking in regions including East Asia and the Pacific, Europe, North America, South America, South Asia, and Sub-Saharan Africa. As of the end of the year, the organization held total assets of $53,223,660 and total liabilities of $3,795,121.

Thailand's rapid growth in the electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) sector has led to significant environmental degradation, including soil and water contamination and a 12% annual increase in e-waste. The report argues that while trade liberalization poses environmental risks, adopting sustainable production and recycling methods can enhance Thailand's global competitiveness. Key recommendations include enacting the draft Thai WEEE Act, utilizing Board of Investment (BOI) incentives for de-manufacturing, and improving waste management through training and certification.

The document examines how international investment agreements (IIAs), particularly bilateral investment treaties (BITs), can undermine domestic public policy and state sovereignty by allowing foreign investors to bypass national courts through international arbitration. It highlights cases in South Africa, the US, and Canada where environmental, social, and human rights policies were challenged. The guide argues for stronger parliamentary scrutiny of these treaties to ensure they do not conflict with constitutional obligations or human rights.

The report documents a pattern of environmental destruction, human rights abuses, and community resistance associated with Barrick Gold's operations across several continents. It highlights specific cases of water depletion, toxic pollution, and violent police repression of protesters, while critiquing the lack of binding legal frameworks in Canada to hold its mining corporations accountable abroad.

The document explains that international investment agreements (IIAs), including bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and preferential trade and investment agreements (PTIAs), often grant foreign investors legal protections that exceed domestic laws. These agreements allow investors to bypass national courts and seek financial compensation through international arbitration if government regulations—such as environmental protections or public health measures—are deemed to be 'expropriations' or discriminatory. The guide highlights a critical lack of transparency in these proceedings, particularly under UNCITRAL rules, and discusses ongoing tensions in EU-ACP negotiations regarding the inclusion of investment rules in economic partnership agreements.

The Threatened or Protected Species Regulations, 2007, issued under the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act 10 of 2004, establish a comprehensive legal framework for managing restricted activities involving listed threatened and protected species in South Africa. The regulations detail a permit system for activities such as hunting, breeding, and trade, and mandate the registration of facilities including captive breeding operations, game farms, and sanctuaries. It includes strict prohibitions on certain hunting methods and activities involving large predators and rhinoceros species, while providing mechanisms for risk assessments, appeals, and the establishment of a Scientific Authority.

The document analyzes proposals by the EC and NAMA-11 to create a horizontal, non-binding mechanism for addressing non-tariff measures (NTMs) that operates independently of the WTO's Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU). It argues that by focusing exclusively on trade restrictiveness rather than legality, these mechanisms risk marginalizing environmental and social policy objectives and leaving developing countries vulnerable to power politics and 'arm-twisting' due to a lack of judicial protection and transparency.