Search Climate Insights Directory

The Canadian Climate Institute suggests that the federal government use the estimated $25.7 billion clean electricity investment tax credit as leverage to incentivize provincial grid modernization. The proposed conditions include mandating independent pathway assessments, updating the mandates of public utilities and regulators to include carbon neutrality, developing formal energy vision documents, and participating in inter-provincial information exchange. The author argues this approach stimulates systemic change while respecting provincial jurisdiction over electricity.

The US power grid is described as highly fragmented, consisting of three isolated interconnections (Eastern, Western, and ERCOT) and 12 transmission planning regions, lacking a national-scale development plan unlike the EU or China. This fragmentation hinders the coordinated response needed for extreme weather events, such as Winter Storm Uri and Winter Storm Elliott. The author advocates for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to mandate both a minimum amount of inter-regional transfer capability based on a simple metric and a robust, scenario-based inter-regional planning process to ensure resource sharing and cost-effective resilience.

The report analyzes the complex, multi-phase transmission development process in California, noting that projects often take a decade or more to complete. It highlights significant delays in environmental reviews and application preparation, while suggesting that competitive solicitation by third-party developers may reduce costs and timelines. To meet Senate Bill 100 goals, the report recommends streamlining CPUC reviews, expanding competitive awards, and implementing state financing to protect ratepayers.

The survey of 3,025 USA respondents found that while initial familiarity with superhot rock geothermal energy is low, support increases significantly after viewing an explainer video. Post-video, nearly 60% of respondents support the technology, and nearly 70% view it as better than other energy sources. Key priorities for low-carbon energy include cost-efficiency (43%) and community health, safety, and environmental impact (38%). Support for the technology and the role of government in supporting energy innovation is high across Democrat, Independent, and Republican affiliations.

The document defines a just energy transition as a shift toward sustainable energy that incorporates environmental justice, ensuring marginalized groups are central to decision-making. It analyzes South Africa's current energy system, which is dominated by coal (approximately 80%), and outlines the legal frameworks, such as the Constitution and NEMA, that support community rights. The guide provides practical steps for accessing information via PAIA, securing free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC), and participating in Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs). It also highlights the potential for community-based renewable energy initiatives, using a case study from Kenya to illustrate successful local ownership.

The report argues that open-source planning models allow nonutility stakeholders to challenge utility-led resource plans, potentially identifying lower-cost, cleaner energy pathways. Using the GenX tool to analyze the 2021 resource plan from Louisville Gas and Electric and Kentucky Utilities, the authors found opportunities for near-term customer savings. The report recommends that regulators increase data transparency, allow early stakeholder review of assumptions, and reduce cost barriers to modeling tools.

The paper highlights how information disparities—specifically regarding distribution networks and emission rates—hinder the effective policymaking and economic efficiency of distributed energy resource (DER) compensation schemes. It suggests that regulators must implement tailored disclosure mandates and incentives for utilities to overcome these asymmetries.

A coalition of environmental and industry organisations calls on the European Commission to finalise the RFNBO delegated act, arguing that regulatory certainty is essential for the renewable hydrogen industry and that strict additionality and correlation rules are necessary to ensure genuine decarbonisation.

The document analyzes the energy landscape of the Legal Amazon, highlighting the disparity between the region's role as a major energy exporter via the National Interconnected System (SIN) and the internal reality of 4 million people disconnected from it. It examines 'Sistemas Isolados' (Isolated Systems) and populations without any electricity access, linking these energy deficits to poor socioeconomic indicators. The report criticizes the current auction model for isolated systems for favoring diesel over renewables and evaluates the 'Mais Luz para a Amazônia' program, providing recommendations for a transition toward decentralized solar energy and improved regulatory frameworks.

The author contends that energy poverty in South Africa persists because the government defines 'access' solely as a physical grid connection, ignoring the critical barriers of affordability and reliability. While electricity is essential for small-scale economic activity, education, and health, the current cost-recovery model and an inadequate Free Basic Electricity policy trap low-income households in poverty. The document calls for a national policy shift to establish clear affordability benchmarks to prevent electricity infrastructure from becoming stranded assets and to unlock broader development goals.

The memo argues that green hydrogen is essential for decarbonising sectors where electrification is not possible, specifically heavy industry and transportation. RMI identifies that while momentum exists, implementation gaps in funding and policy must be addressed to make the solution viable by 2030.

The paper synthesises evidence on residential energy efficiency interventions (REEIs) to estimate their overall impact on energy consumption and emissions, while examining causes of variation and cost-effectiveness.

The document updates the climate tools and policies of several Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) as of October 2021. Key updates include the African Development Bank's (AfDB) commitment to no longer finance coal projects and the Inter-American Development Bank's (IDB) use of industry benchmarks for high-emitting sectors. It also notes that the Asian Development Bank (ADB) planned to review its coal financing policies in 2021 and details specific exceptions to natural gas exclusion lists, such as projects meeting a 250g CO2e/kWhe emissions standard.

The document outlines the need for financial, operational, and policy reforms within India's power distribution companies (discoms) to overcome losses and enable the transition to a clean energy future.

The report argues that the current U.S. electricity transmission system is too slow and fragmented to meet decarbonization goals, which require tripling or quadrupling generating capacity and significantly expanding long-distance transmission. It proposes a '5P' framework—planning, permitting, paying, participation, and process—to replace the traditional three-P approach. The authors contrast two primary policy models: a private-enterprise approach relying on market incentives and regulatory streamlining, and a public-initiative approach centered on a National Transmission Authority (NTA) with federal siting and ownership powers. The report concludes that a national transmission plan is an imperative to coordinate these efforts across state and federal jurisdictions.

The document identifies decentralised renewable energy (DRE) as the most cost-effective option for over half of the electricity connections needed by 2030 in emerging markets. To scale this, it proposes three 'building blocks': increasing public investment to leverage private capital, establishing stable political and regulatory frameworks to mitigate investment risks, and creating an enabling environment through capacity building and innovation. The author highlights a partnership with AISER Benin as an example of concrete market development activity.

Uruguay transitioned its electricity generation to 98% renewable sources by 2019 through the Energy Policy 2005–2030, significantly increasing wind power capacity and creating over 11,000 jobs in the renewable energy sector by 2018. This transition was supported by tripartite social dialogue involving the government, employers, and unions, as well as technical assistance from the International Labour Organization (ILO). While the shift successfully retired fossil-fuel plants with minimal worker impact through early retirement, it introduced challenges including the privatization of the electricity sector and a reliance on foreign manufacturers for renewable energy equipment.

The report explores four international business models—municipal ownership in Germany, state-owned enterprise (SOE) transition in Denmark, public-private partnerships (PPPs) in Morocco, and cooperatives in the United Kingdom—to identify pathways for increasing renewable energy deployment in South Africa. It argues that while the current private-sector-led model (REIPPPP) has increased capacity, it is insufficient to meet the 1.5°C Paris Agreement target or offset the decommissioning of 24,100 MW of coal plants. The authors suggest that a combination of centralized and decentralized public ownership models can address political opposition from trade unions and parties while scaling up green energy. Key recommendations include reforming Eskom into a 'green utility,' conducting a policy gap analysis, and investigating the financial feasibility of non-private ownership models.

The document examines the failure of South Africa's energy policies to ensure affordable electricity for the poor. It highlights that poor households spend up to 17% of their income on energy and identifies two main causes: the absence of a formal definition of 'affordable energy' and the systemic failure of municipalities to distribute Free Basic Electricity (FBE) grants. Specifically, in 2019, while the national budget funded basic services for 9.8 million households, only 2 million actually received free electricity, leaving 5.4 million eligible households without the benefit and resulting in a loss of R6 billion in value.

The document argues that the promise of affordable electricity for all in South Africa, established by the Energy Act of 1998, remains unfulfilled. It identifies two primary causes: the lack of a clear government definition for 'affordable energy' and the failure of municipalities to distribute Free Basic Electricity (FBE) grants to eligible low-income households. Research indicates a significant gap in 2019, where national budget support was provided for 9.8 million households to receive basic services, but only 2 million households actually received free basic electricity through their municipalities.