Search Climate Insights Directory

The report defines clean firm generation as dispatchable, low-emission electricity sources that do not rely on weather, including nuclear fission, fusion, geothermal, and carbon-capture-enabled fossil or bioenergy. It argues that integrating these technologies can significantly lower the total amount of wind, solar, and storage capacity needed, thereby reducing land use, critical mineral requirements, and overall system costs. The authors identify a 'missing middle' or 'valley of death' in financing for these capital-intensive projects and propose a multi-layered policy approach—combining RD&D, direct procurement, and technology-neutral targets—to achieve systemic bankability.

Ember's response to India's draft National Electricity Policy 2026 argues for a shift from sequential to co-optimised generation and transmission planning to resolve bottlenecks and stranded assets. The brief recommends deploying grid-enhancing technologies to manage the rise of inverter-based resources, unbundling state transmission utilities to increase private sector participation, and reforming DISCOM procurement to avoid over-reliance on long-term coal contracts. It also calls for a robust data-sharing and cybersecurity framework to manage the increasing volume of electricity data from distributed energy resources.

The document outlines the complex regulatory and permitting landscape for transmission in Colorado, contrasting the processes for public utilities and independent developers. It highlights the role of the Colorado Electric Transmission Authority (CETA) in addressing transmission gaps identified in a 2024 study, specifically through its ability to issue revenue bonds, exercise eminent domain, and facilitate public-private partnerships to advance complex projects that traditional utility planning might overlook.

The report positions renewable energy expansion as a national security imperative for Japan, which had an energy import dependence of 87.4% in 2024. It argues that the current 7th Strategic Energy Plan is insufficient for the 1.5°C target and proposes a more ambitious pathway to reach 80-90% clean power by 2035-2040. Key recommendations include upscaling grid capacity, fast-tracking permitting, expanding distributed energy, and using long-term offtake agreements to lower capital costs. The document highlights Japan's potential in offshore wind, agrivoltaics, and perovskite solar cells as means to reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels and Chinese crystalline-silicon PV.

In 2025, India's renewable energy curtailment was primarily driven by transmission infrastructure mismatches and system-wide emergency conditions managed via Tertiary Reserve Ancillary Services (TRAS). While non-fossil fuel capacity reached 266.7 GW by December 2025, the gap between rapid project deployment and slower transmission construction led to significant energy loss, particularly for projects under temporary general network access (T-GNA). Emergency TRAS-down events, often triggered by demand forecasting errors, also caused notable curtailment, such as 93.3 GWh of solar output on 12 October 2025.

The report argues that the United States can meet surging electricity demand from AI data centers using clean energy while phasing out fossil fuels, provided that stronger state and federal policies are implemented. It warns that under current policies, data center growth will increase reliance on gas and coal, leading to higher emissions and significant costs for ratepayers. Conversely, adopting clean energy policies—such as restoring federal tax credits and implementing carbon-free electricity standards—could save trillions of dollars in climate and health damages, far outweighing the costs of the energy transition.

The report analyzes power outage data from 2014 to 2024 in the central United States, specifically the MISO+ region, finding that all of the 100 worst outage days were caused by extreme weather. It highlights that the 10 most severe events occurred after 2020 and were often compound disasters, such as hurricanes combined with flooding or winter storms with tornadoes. The document argues that climate change is intensifying these risks—increasing the frequency of derechos, the rainfall of hurricanes, and the potential for severe winter outbreaks—while disproportionately impacting socially vulnerable communities. It recommends that utilities, states, and regional operators implement comprehensive climate risk assessments, accelerate the clean energy transition, and engage in meaningful community partnership to build a resilient grid.

The report identifies an investible renewable energy market in South Africa of R161.2 billion across 12.9 GW of capacity by 2030. It highlights two primary investment areas: large-scale solar PV, wind, and battery energy storage systems (BESS) targeting the private wheeling market, and behind-the-meter (BTM) solar PV and BESS for commercial and industrial users. Key drivers include electricity price instability, decarbonisation pressures from international regulations like the EU's CSRD, and energy security needs. However, the market faces significant barriers, most notably severe grid connection constraints in high-resource zones and a lack of standardised municipal wheeling frameworks. The report also notes the transition toward a competitive South African Wholesale Electricity Market (SAWEM) and the introduction of the Independent Transmission Infrastructure Procurement Programme (ITIPP) to attract private capital for grid expansion.

The report identifies key pillars for integrating non-conventional renewable energy (NCRE) in Latin America and the Caribbean, emphasizing the need for long-term state policies, proactive system planning, and updated regulatory frameworks. It highlights successful models in Uruguay, Chile, and Brazil, while contrasting these with challenges in Colombia, particularly regarding the lack of multi-party political consensus and coordination between generation and transmission planning.

The report argues that Colombia's electrical framework is outdated, designed for a hydro-thermal system and creating barriers to the integration of solar and wind energy. It proposes a structural shift toward a 'energy plus attributes' model, where systemic services like inertia and voltage control are explicitly valued. Key recommendations include reforming the reliability charge (Cargo por Confiabilidad), optimizing transmission capacity allocation to prevent 'hoarding', and transitioning to a more proactive planning role for the UPME. Technical evidence suggests Colombia could operate with over 95% renewable energy by 2038 if these regulatory and market bottlenecks are resolved.

The report argues that accelerating the deployment of non-conventional renewable energy sources (FNCER) in Colombia does not require structural legal reforms, as existing laws provide the Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME), the Energy and Gas Regulatory Commission (CREG), and the Mining and Energy Planning Unit (UPME) with sufficient powers to implement necessary changes. It provides a detailed roadmap of actionable recommendations across five strategic lines: efficient use of transmission capacity, modernization of reliability schemes, integration of synchronous condensers and thermal asset conversion, long-term contracting and auctions for FNCER, and adjustments to short-term market and dispatch rules. The document emphasizes that the primary challenge is the strategic and coordinated activation of existing administrative instruments—such as decrees, resolutions, and planning documents—rather than the creation of new laws.

The report outlines a methodology for financial institutions to assess the transition risks and opportunities of power companies in Southeast Asia using three analytical pillars: transition footprint mapping, investment alignment, and dependency mapping. It leverages asset-level data from Global Energy Monitor to help institutions evaluate asset bases, project pipelines, and systemic barriers to decarbonization.

Earthjustice responds to a DOE request for information on accelerating power delivery for AI and industrial growth. The organization argues against reviving retired coal plants due to high costs and unreliability, instead advocating for the rapid deployment of wind, solar, and battery storage. It recommends that the DOE address speculative and inflated data center load forecasts, automate interconnection studies to reduce timelines, and deploy Advanced Transmission Technologies (ATTs) to increase grid capacity quickly. Additionally, it emphasizes the need for early community engagement in permitting and the long-term expansion of interregional transmission lines.

India has struggled to launch its offshore wind market despite a decade of policy efforts, with two major auctions called off in 2025. The brief identifies rigid pricing structures, a lack of local supply chains for high-capacity turbines, and transmission risks as primary barriers. It argues that India should move away from blunt competitive auctions for first-of-a-kind projects and instead adopt global best practices, such as flexible tariffs, 'ready-to-build' tender packages, and compensation for grid delays, to attract investment and develop domestic industry.

The Clean Air Task Force (CATF) opposes the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) proposal to rescind the Conservation and Landscape Health Rule. CATF argues that the rule aligns with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and provides critical tools, such as mitigation leases, that streamline the permitting of energy infrastructure, including high-voltage transmission and geothermal projects. The document claims the BLM's justification for rescission is legally insufficient and ignores the rule's role in promoting ecosystem resilience and carbon storage.

The policy brief examines how virtual power plants (VPPs) can mitigate grid interconnection delays for large loads, specifically data centers, in the United States. It highlights that VPPs can scale to meet over 20% of US peak demand by 2030 and are significantly cheaper than new gas plants. The document proposes three commercial models—pass-through funding, capacity transfer, and reliability reinforcement—to align incentives between large loads, utilities, and VPP aggregators. It also recommends reforms in interconnection policy, integrated planning, and customer protection to enable this transition.

The Big Eddy-Knight project, a 28-mile transmission line completed in 2015 by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), utilized a proactive settlement agreement with the Friends of the Columbia River Gorge (FOCG) to mitigate environmental impacts and reduce litigation risk. While the agreement established a $1.78 million mitigation fund primarily used for land conservation and some utility upgrades, it faced criticism from local landowners and Klickitat County officials who felt the benefits did not directly address the impacts on those most affected by the project's footprint. The project also involved complex consultations with the Yakama Nation and other Tribes, leading to route adjustments to protect cultural resources, including a cave with ancient drawings.

The Mona to Oquirrh transmission line, a 100-mile project completed in 2013, faced significant opposition from Tooele City due to a lack of early community engagement and a proposed route that threatened a valued viewshed. Despite initial refusals by Rocky Mountain Power (RMP) to reroute, the City used its ownership of a small portion of the land to launch legal challenges, including a temporary restraining order. This forced RMP into negotiations, resulting in a January 2011 settlement where RMP agreed to reroute the line behind the mountains and provide community benefits, including the purchase of 130 acres of open space and a $500,000 contribution to the Skyline Nature Park.

The document analyzes a partnership between San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E) and the nonprofit Citizens Energy to integrate community benefits into transmission infrastructure. Through the 'Citizens Model,' Citizens Energy acts as a participating transmission owner, reinvesting a portion of its profits into local programs. In the Sunrise Powerlink project, this funded the Imperial Valley Solar project, the largest low-income community solar project in the U.S. For the Sycamore-Peñasquitos line, funds were used to provide electric vehicles and charging stations to local nonprofits. While the model helped derisk projects and secure regulatory approval, the authors note a 'top-down' approach to determining benefits that lacked direct community consultation.

The Vineyard Wind 1 project, the first commercial-scale offshore wind facility in the United States, utilized a proactive community engagement strategy and a negotiated Host Community Agreement (HCA) with the Town of Barnstable to secure necessary permits and reduce local opposition. Signed in 2018, the HCA provided $16 million in payments over 25 years, estimated property tax revenues of $20 million, and critical infrastructure support, including $3 million in savings for the town by coordinating the installation of transmission cables with the construction of a public sewer system. The agreement also addressed specific local concerns regarding groundwater contamination through substation design modifications and the provision of funds for external technical experts. Beyond the Barnstable HCA, Vineyard Wind implemented several other frameworks, including a Tribal Benefit Agreement with the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe, a Good Neighbor Agreement with Nantucket, and a project labor agreement targeting diverse hiring. While the project successfully navigated a complex regulatory environment involving federal (BOEM, USACE) and state (EFSB, MEPA) agencies, the report notes that increasing political pushback against offshore wind in the region suggests that such frameworks must be tailored to specific community contexts rather than treated as a universal model.