Search Climate Insights Directory

The document emphasizes that adopting a human rights approach to climate action is essential for protecting those on the frontlines of climate impacts, including indigenous peoples and local communities. It traces the progressive recognition of human rights within the UNFCCC, from the 2010 Cancun Agreements to the 2015 Paris Agreement, and highlights the role of updated Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) in promoting public participation. For the SB50 negotiations, it specifically identifies the need for social and environmental safeguards in Article 6 mechanisms to avoid the rights infringements seen under the Clean Development Mechanism, and notes the importance of reviewing the Warsaw International Mechanism on Loss and Damage and the Gender Action Plan.

The report identifies a gender gap in the U.S. where women generally exhibit higher levels of concern and risk perception regarding climate change than men, despite scoring lower on tests of scientific knowledge and expressing greater uncertainty about climate facts. It argues that closing these knowledge gaps through targeted education is essential, as women are often more vulnerable to climate impacts and are key to implementing global climate solutions.

A March 2018 survey of 1,067 registered US voters reveals broad bipartisan support for renewable energy and carbon pollution limits, despite significant political divides over the causes of global warming and the priority level assigned to climate action. While 73% of voters believe global warming is happening, only 40% of conservative Republicans share this view. However, majorities across the political spectrum support funding renewable energy research and regulating carbon dioxide. The report also notes a gap between stated support for climate action and actual individual engagement, with only 13% of voters having contacted an elected official about global warming in the previous year.

The strategy provides a blueprint for the Government of Saint Lucia to use purposeful communication to foster a whole-of-government approach to climate adaptation. It focuses on translating technical climate science into meaningful narratives for diverse stakeholders, including political leaders, farmers, fishers, and youth. The framework emphasizes the use of a mix of traditional media (television, radio) and digital platforms (Facebook, WhatsApp) to drive behavioral change and secure investment for adaptation measures across priority sectors such as tourism, agriculture, and water.

The report finds that while a majority of US registered voters believe global warming is happening and human-caused, there is a significant political divide, particularly with conservative Republicans. Despite these divisions, there is broad cross-party support for various clean energy policies, such as renewable energy research and tax rebates for energy-efficient vehicles. However, support for more restrictive measures, like carbon taxes or strict emission limits on coal plants, is lower among conservative Republicans. The report also notes a gap between voters' willingness to advocate for climate policy and their actual engagement in such activities.

The report finds that while a majority of US registered voters believe global warming is happening and human-caused, there is significant political polarization, particularly among conservative Republicans. Despite this, there is broad cross-party support for various clean energy policies, such as renewable energy research and tax rebates for energy-efficient vehicles. However, a gap exists between the willingness of voters to advocate for climate policy and their actual engagement in such activities.

The May 2017 survey indicates that 70% of Americans believe global warming is happening, with 58% attributing it to human activities. While 59% believe it affects U.S. weather and 40% report personal experience with its effects, most perceive it as a distant threat. Public understanding of the scientific consensus remains low, with only 13% aware that over 90% of climate scientists agree on human-caused warming. Despite broad support for climate education in schools (78%), optimism for successful human intervention is low, with only 7% believing humans can and will successfully reduce global warming.

The report finds that Latinos in the U.S. are significantly more engaged with global warming than non-Latinos, showing higher levels of belief in human-caused warming, greater worry, and stronger support for climate policies. Spanish-language Latinos exhibit the highest levels of engagement. While many Latinos are willing to take political action, they face specific barriers, including a lack of outreach from organizations and fears regarding immigration authorities.

The report highlights that while African countries have shown ambition in their Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs), they lack the financial resources, technical capacity, and institutional frameworks necessary for implementation. It emphasizes the need for a shift from top-down to bottom-up adaptation strategies, the integration of climate change into national education curricula, and the harmonisation of regional policies, particularly within the East African Community. The document argues for a comprehensive African research agenda to generate evidence-based policies and the use of 'hooks' to align climate action with sustainable development goals to limit temperature increases to 1.5°C.

The March 2016 survey indicates that 70% of Americans believe global warming is happening, with an increase in the proportion of people who are 'very worried' and perceive it as a current or future threat to themselves and others. While 53% attribute global warming to human causes, only 11% are aware of the scientific consensus. There is broad support for greenhouse gas emission reductions in the U.S. and for teaching children about global warming, though confidence in the U.S. Congress's ability to pass necessary legislation remains low at 37%.

The report finds that 70% of Americans believe global warming is happening, a seven percent increase since spring 2015. Public concern is rising, with 58% expressing worry and a record 38% believing people in the U.S. are being harmed "right now". There is strong support (76%) for teaching children about global warming in school.

The report finds that 70% of Americans believe global warming is happening, though only 53% believe it is mostly human-caused and 11% are aware of the strong scientific consensus. While 58% express worry, few are 'very worried,' and many perceive the threat as distant, though perceptions of immediate harm in the U.S. have reached a record high of 38%. There is strong public support for corporate and individual action, as well as for teaching climate change in schools, but low confidence in the U.S. Congress's ability to pass necessary legislation.

The report finds that 70% of Americans believe global warming is happening, with 53% attributing it to human causes. While worry about the issue is increasing, a significant gap remains between public perception and scientific consensus, as only 11% of respondents recognize that over 90% of climate scientists agree on human-caused warming. Most Americans believe corporations, industry, and citizens should do more to address the issue, and 61% support the U.S. reducing greenhouse gas emissions regardless of other countries' actions.

The SAIIA Youth Policy Committee (YPC) advocates for a legally binding agreement at COP21 that emphasizes high ambition, the integration of adaptation and mitigation, and predictable finance for developing countries. The YPC calls for the inclusion of an adaptation goal in the Paris agreement, the use of indigenous knowledge in local strategies, and the implementation of 'no regret' and flexible adaptation strategies. It further argues that developed countries must fund these efforts and that climate change should be integrated into school curricula to maintain youth commitment.

The report finds that while many Indians observe unpredictable weather and feel vulnerable to droughts and floods, initial awareness of 'global warming' is low. However, after receiving a definition, a majority believe it is happening and human-caused. There is significant support for national education programs and policies to reduce fuel, water, and energy waste, even at an economic cost, with scientists being the most trusted information source.

A 2011 survey of 4,031 Indian adults found that while initial awareness of global warming was low, a majority of respondents believed in its occurrence and human cause after receiving a brief definition. Most participants reported vulnerability to extreme weather and supported national efforts to reduce global warming and increase public education, despite potential economic costs.

The study reveals significant gaps in public knowledge regarding climate change in the United States, with a majority of participants failing to demonstrate basic understanding of the greenhouse effect and its causes, despite a general belief that global warming is occurring and a high level of trust in scientific organizations.

The report finds that a large majority of Americans, across political affiliations, support federal climate and energy policies such as renewable energy research and carbon dioxide regulation, even as general concern about global warming has declined. While support for cap-and-trade is sensitive to cost increases, it increases significantly if households receive offsets to cover higher energy costs.

The document outlines a comprehensive approach to implementing deliberative democracy for climate policy, detailing a five-phase process: preparation, learning, reflection, recommendation drafting, and decision-making. It emphasizes the need for independent governance, representative sampling, and inclusive accessibility measures to ensure high-quality, legitimate public policy recommendations.

The document outlines a comprehensive approach to implementing climate citizens' assemblies, emphasizing deliberative democracy to generate public policy recommendations. It details a five-phase process—preparation, learning, reflection/deliberation, recommendation drafting, and decision-making—while highlighting the importance of independent governance, inclusive participant selection, and the use of specific facilitation techniques to ensure balanced participation. The guide also provides practical tools for managing virtual and physical sessions, ensuring accessibility for diverse populations, and maintaining the anonymity of participants to protect the integrity of the deliberative process.