Search Climate Insights Directory

Indonesia faces significant fiscal strain and energy security risks due to its heavy reliance on imported, subsidized LPG, which is used by 84% of households. The report evaluates three alternatives: induction stoves, dimethyl ether (DME), and city gas. It concludes that induction is the only viable non-fossil option, offering health benefits and long-term fiscal savings if paired with electricity tariff reform and a decarbonized grid. DME and city gas are deemed economically unviable or incompatible with climate goals. The report provides a policy roadmap focusing on making electricity upgrades affordable, implementing means-tested induction subsidies, and reforming LPG subsidies to target only the poorest households.

The report examines why China's coal power capacity continued to grow between 2016 and 2020 despite decarbonization goals, citing both surface-level needs (supply security, heating) and deep-seated drivers (local government enthusiasm, rigid dispatch mechanisms). It argues that coal power must transition into a 'supportive role' providing flexibility and backup for wind and solar. To achieve this, the authors suggest four policy entry points: breaking path dependency by curbing local government enthusiasm, reforming electricity markets to incentivize flexibility, coordinating coal and electricity policies to ensure supply security, and adopting a reflexive, inclusive governance model.

The paper examines the Swedish heat-energy system, noting that while Sweden uses the highest total amount of renewable energy for heating among EU Member States, the system faces risks of lock-in for less sustainable practices. The authors identify interconnectedness, complementarity, and saturation as three regime characteristics contributing to these tensions and an unstable future.

Sweden has successfully transitioned its heating system to low-carbon sources, with fossil fuels now accounting for under 5% of heating energy. This was achieved through the expansion of district heating, which covers over 50% of the building stock, and the widespread adoption of heat pumps in single-family homes. However, the report identifies significant 'lock-ins' where the dominance of large suppliers and a focus on production over efficiency hinder further progress. Key challenges include a reliance on waste incineration, high indoor temperature norms, and resistance from industry players toward stricter building energy efficiency standards. The authors recommend shifting focus toward demand-reduction technologies and lowering barriers for third-party access to district heating networks to better integrate industrial waste heat.

The research examines the Kenyan solar PV market, challenging the narrative that its growth was purely private-sector led. It argues that donor support was critical in building innovation systems by funding experimentation, network-building, and technical training. The study highlights the transition from Solar Home Systems (SHS) to pico-solar products, the role of 'innovation system builders' like Energy Alternatives Africa (EAA) and Lighting Africa, and the complex interactions between niche actors and the Kenyan government's energy policy regime.

The report analyzes urban sanitation trends across Sub-Saharan Africa, China, India, South East Asia, and Latin America, while examining the technical and social interactions between these systems and menstrual waste disposal. It finds that menstrual products, particularly those with super-absorbent materials, frequently cause blockages in water-borne sewerage systems and reduce the design life of on-site pit latrines. The document argues that menstrual management is largely ignored in sanitation design, leading to privacy issues for women and operational failures in infrastructure. It recommends the use of solid waste streams for menstrual product disposal and the design of 'women-friendly' facilities that include private waste bins and hand-washing stations.

The paper argues that while digital technologies offer opportunities for efficiency in crisis response, they are not neutral and can compromise fundamental humanitarian principles. It identifies key analytical prisms—humanitarian space, public-private partnerships, resource distribution (e.g., digital food/cash), human relations, and data-driven vulnerabilities—to guide future academic inquiry into the 'technological turn' of humanitarian action.