Search Climate Insights Directory
6 results
SUBMISSIONS ON ESKOM’S APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION IN TERMS OF SECTION 59 WITH THE MINIMUM EMISSION STANDARDS FOR 8 OF ITS COAL-FIRED POWER STATIONS
The Centre for Environmental Rights (CER), on behalf of groundWork and Earthlife Africa, submits a formal objection to Eskom's application for exemptions from Minimum Emission Standards (MES) for eight coal-fired power stations under section 59 of the Air Quality Act (AQA). The submission argues that these exemptions violate the constitutional right to a healthy environment, particularly for residents in Priority Areas, and that Eskom has failed to justify its 14-year delay in achieving compliance.
AI-generated
This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.
Document type: Statement
OBJECTION BY GROUNDWORK SOUTH AFRICA TO KARPOWERSHIP SA RICHARDS BAY (RF) (PTY) LIMITED'S APPLICATION FOR AN ELECTRICITY GENERATION LICENCE SUBMITTED TO THE NATIONAL ENERGY REGULATOR OF SOUTH AFRICA
Groundwork South Africa submitted an affidavit to the National Energy Regulator of South Africa (NERSA) objecting to Karpowership SA Richards Bay's application for an electricity generation licence. The objection argues that the project fails to meet the requirements of the Electricity Regulation Act (ERA) and the National Energy Regulator Act (NERA), citing severe environmental risks, lack of necessary permits, and the existence of cheaper, cleaner energy alternatives.
AI-generated
This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.
Document type: Statement
SUBMISSIONS ON ARCELORMITTAL VANDERBIJLPARK WORKS’ APPLICATION FOR A POSTPONEMENT AND ALTERNATIVE PLANT STANDARDS OF THE LISTED ACTIVITIES AND ASSOCIATED MINIMUM EMISSION STANDARDS
The Vaal Environmental Justice Alliance (VEJA) and groundWork (gW) submitted a formal objection on 11 March 2019 against ArcelorMittal South Africa’s (AMSA) application for the postponement and alternative plant standards of minimum emission standards (MES) at its Vanderbijlpark Works. The submitters argue that AMSA's requests are unlawful, fail to meet statutory requirements, and would violate the constitutional right to a healthy environment.
AI-generated
This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.
Document type: Statement
ADDITIONAL SUBMISSIONS REGARDING THE VARIATION OF THE ATMOSPHERIC EMISSION LICENCE FOR ESKOM’S KRIEL POWER STATION
The Centre for Environmental Rights (CER), representing several community and environmental groups, submitted a response to the Nkangala District Municipality opposing Eskom's application to vary the atmospheric emission licence for the Kriel Power Station. The CER argues that the variation would permit increased emissions of particulate matter (PM10) and mercury, leading to significant public health risks and economic costs, while challenging Eskom's dispersion modelling and cost calculations for abatement technology.
AI-generated
This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.
Document type: Statement
ela-nersa-objections-of-15-december-2016-a8148328f3a7f5d9.pdf
Earthlife Africa Johannesburg (ELA) submitted formal objections to the National Energy Regulator of South Africa (NERSA) regarding a license application by Thabametsi Power Company (Pty) Limited to operate a 630MW coal-fired power plant near Lephalale, Limpopo. ELA argues that the project is financially risky, environmentally damaging, and inconsistent with South Africa's international climate commitments under the Paris Agreement.
AI-generated
This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.
Document type: Statement
gw-objection-karpowerships-saldanha-nersa-commissioned-4.08.2021-f56e19364879c239.pdf
This document is a formal objection submitted by the Centre for Environmental Rights (CER) to the National Energy Regulator of South Africa (NERSA) regarding the proposed use of Karpowerships in Saldanha Bay. The CER argues that the project is inconsistent with South Africa's climate commitments, lacks transparency, and fails to consider cheaper, cleaner energy alternatives.
AI-generated
This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.
Document type: Statement