Final Notice of Objection to Re-evaluation Decision RVD2017-01, Glyphosate, April 28, 2017

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment and other organizations are calling for an independent review of the PMRA's glyphosate re-evaluation decision (RVD2017-01). They argue that internal Monsanto documents, revealed during California litigation, show the company ghostwrote scientific studies and suppressed evidence of cancer risks—studies that the PMRA relied upon for its determination that glyphosate is unlikely to pose a human cancer risk. The authors also claim the PMRA failed to consider evidence regarding monarch decline, microbiomes, and the inefficiency of buffer zones as risk management strategies.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Litigation in California revealed internal Monsanto documents suggesting the company knew for decades that glyphosate and Roundup could cause cancer, leading to a jury finding that the company acted with "malice or oppression."
  • Evidence from the "Monsanto Papers" indicates that Monsanto scientists ghostwrote or edited several studies that the PMRA used in its re-evaluation decision, including works by Kier and Kirkland (2013), Greim et al. (2015), and Williams GM et al. (2016).
  • The journal Critical Reviews in Toxicology issued an Expression of Concern regarding five articles referenced by the PMRA, with subsequent corrigenda for three articles disclosing previously omitted contributions and competing interests.
  • The authors allege the PMRA's re-evaluation was deficient because it failed to consider evidence regarding glyphosate's impact on monarch decline, human and soil microbiomes, cancer risks, and the mobilization of cadmium in grains.

Cite the original document

APA
Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (2018). Final Notice of Objection to Re-evaluation Decision RVD2017-01, Glyphosate, April 28, 2017. https://cape.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/2018-10-29-edited-Nov-92c-2018-Ltr-to-Minister-of-Health-re-Glyphosate-Objection.signed.pdf
Chicago
Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment. Final Notice of Objection to Re-evaluation Decision RVD2017-01, Glyphosate, April 28, 2017. 2018. https://cape.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/2018-10-29-edited-Nov-92c-2018-Ltr-to-Minister-of-Health-re-Glyphosate-Objection.signed.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite press release |author=Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment |title=Final Notice of Objection to Re-evaluation Decision RVD2017-01, Glyphosate, April 28, 2017 |date=9 November 2018 |url=https://cape.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/2018-10-29-edited-Nov-92c-2018-Ltr-to-Minister-of-Health-re-Glyphosate-Objection.signed.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@misc{canadianassociationofphysiciansfortheenvironment2018final, author = {{Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment}}, title = {{Final Notice of Objection to Re-evaluation Decision RVD2017-01, Glyphosate, April 28, 2017}}, publisher = {Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment}, year = {2018}, month = nov, url = {https://cape.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/2018-10-29-edited-Nov-92c-2018-Ltr-to-Minister-of-Health-re-Glyphosate-Objection.signed.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated