Search Climate Insights Directory

The document outlines the difficulties of decarbonizing commercial aviation, noting that it contributes nearly 4% of historical global warming when non-CO2 effects are included. It highlights the limitations of sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) and electric aircraft, the disproportionate impact of frequent flyers, and the prevalence of greenwashing in the industry.

The Universal Basic Income Coalition (UBIC) argues that proposed amendments to the Social Relief of Distress (SRD) Grant regulations are insufficient and ignore a High Court ruling declaring key elements unconstitutional. UBIC highlights that the grant value of R370 remains below half the food poverty line (R796) and that the means test threshold of R624 continues to exclude needy applicants. The submission criticizes the short three-week public consultation window and the persistence of digital and linguistic barriers, urging the government to replace piecemeal annual extensions with a permanent, inclusive universal basic income grant to support 9 million food-insecure people.

The Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA) has voted to replace mandatory requirements for reducing client emissions with 'best practice' advice and has removed the obligation for banks to align with the 1.5°C warming limit and 2050 carbon neutrality goal. The new guidelines allow banks to align with a 'warming well below 2°C, aiming for 1.5°C' and let them choose their own target year for carbon neutrality. Reclaim Finance argues this shift ignores current climate science and suggests banks are now following existing economic emission trends rather than actively modifying them to accelerate the transition.

The Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA) has voted to convert mandatory requirements for reducing client emissions into "best practice" guidance, removing the requirement for banks to set targets aligned with the 1.5°C warming limit and the 2050 net zero goal.

The Universal Basic Income Coalition (UBIC) argues that proposed amendments to the COVID-19 Social Relief of Distress (SRD) grant regulations in South Africa are insufficient and fail to address long-standing exclusionary barriers. UBIC highlights that the late publication of amendments created uncertainty for beneficiaries and that the current system continues to exclude millions through digital barriers, restrictive means-tests, and a failure to adjust grant values for inflation. The coalition specifically criticizes the proposed deletion of sub-regulation 3(b), which may render the collection of certain applicant data baseless, and calls for the grant to be transitioned into a permanent basic income programme rather than continuing annual piecemeal extensions.

Reclaim Finance claims that ENGIE's long-term LNG import contracts, particularly those from the United States, drive the development of new export terminals and gas fields, contradicting decarbonization scenarios. The document highlights that these contracts lock in carbon-intensive trajectories for decades and risk creating stranded assets as European gas demand declines. It specifically cites contracts linked to the Port Arthur LNG terminal and the Rio Grande LNG project, the latter of which saw its carbon capture and sequestration project abandoned. Consequently, Reclaim Finance calls on shareholders to vote against the re-election of CEO Catherine MacGregor and the 'Say on Climate' proposal.

The document analyzes how climate change accelerates biodiversity loss and how the loss of ecosystems further destabilizes the climate. It critiques 'false solutions' such as monoculture tree plantations, carbon offsets, and geoengineering, arguing they often cause more harm than good. The report calls for a systemic shift toward agroecology, community-led energy transitions, and the protection of Indigenous rights.

Reclaim Finance criticizes ENGIE for planning a 500 MW fossil gas power plant in Nijmegen, Netherlands, arguing the project is unnecessary given the Netherlands' goal of decarbonized electricity by 2035. The organization claims that ENGIE's promise of 'hydrogen compatibility' is an illusion and warns that the project risks becoming a stranded asset, potentially requiring taxpayer-funded compensation for early closure, similar to previous coal plant exits in the region. Reclaim Finance calls on shareholders, including the French government and private investors like Amundi, BNP Paribas AM, and AXA Investment Managers, to vote against ENGIE's climate plan and management resolutions.

A joint statement by civil society organisations demanding the censure of South African Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana. The organisations argue that the Minister used a press interview to mislead the public by claiming the Social Relief of Distress (SRD) grant caused budget constraints, thereby attempting to justify a VAT increase and bypass government policy. They propose alternative revenue-raising measures, such as wealth taxes and removing corporate tax incentives, to avoid harming the poor.

The document is a joint statement from over 360 organisations condemning the European Commission's 'Omnibus proposal' as a 'dangerous deregulation' effort. The signatories argue that the proposal undermines the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), and the Taxonomy Regulation. They claim the proposal would reduce corporate accountability, limit access to justice for victims of human rights and environmental abuses, and diminish the quality of sustainability data by excluding a large number of companies from reporting obligations. The statement calls on EU leadership to block these changes and maintain the EU's commitment to becoming the first climate-neutral continent by 2050.

Reclaim Finance warns that proposed carbon offset protocols for replacing coal plants with renewables risk overestimating emission reductions and allowing polluters to avoid their own decarbonization. The author asserts that large-scale coal phase-outs require governments and financial institutions to accept investment losses and provide significant support for sustainable energy deployment.

The document is a formal letter from a coalition of organizations to the U.S. House Subcommittee on Federal Lands opposing H.R. 1820 (the FLASH Act). The authors argue that the bill's mandates for road construction and border barriers would cause severe environmental harm, including habitat destruction and increased fire risk, while claiming that several sections are unnecessary because existing laws and agreements already grant the requested authorities to border security agencies.

GreenLatinos condemns President Donald Trump's congressional speech, arguing that his agenda prioritizes corporate polluters over public health and environmental justice. The organization highlights significant losses in clean energy employment and investment, as well as projected increases in energy costs for working families.

GreenLatinos asserts that President Trump's agenda rolls back environmental protections and stalls the clean energy transition, resulting in significant job losses and increased costs for working-class families.

Reclaim Finance criticizes ArcelorMittal for contradictions between its public decarbonization claims and its actual financial and operational actions. The organization highlights delayed hydrogen-based steel projects in Europe, insufficient capital expenditure for decarbonization, and misleading emissions reporting. It calls on investors to pressure the company to publish an updated Climate Action Report (CAR3) with a clear timeline to phase out coal globally.

Global Witness reports that Veolia is discharging untreated toxic leachate from a landfill into protected wetlands in Colombia, with sediment analysis showing mercury levels 25 times higher than safety limits. The report links this pollution to congenital malformations in the local population and the degradation of the San Silvestre swamp, which provides drinking water for up to 300,000 people in Barrancabermeja. While Veolia denies causality and claims its internal controls show no mercury, independent experts argue the company's sampling methods were flawed. The document also highlights the extreme danger faced by environmental defenders in the Santander region and argues that the EU's Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive is essential for holding such companies accountable.

The statement by Friends of the Earth International criticizes current biodiversity financing mechanisms as unjust and insufficient, highlighting how the global financial sector drives nature loss through credits to extractive industries and debt cycles in developing nations. It rejects market-based solutions like biodiversity offsets and green bonds as 'greenwashing' and calls for direct financial support for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs).

Civil society organisations are protesting the handover of McDonald’s-branded ‘Mi Desk’ desks to Cape Town schools, facilitated by the Minister of Basic Education. The groups argue that such donations are not charity but junk food marketing targeting vulnerable children amidst a crisis of malnutrition and obesity. They contend that corporate philanthropy fills gaps created by state austerity and disinvestment, particularly in rural and working-class communities. The statement calls for the immediate recall of branded desks, the finalisation of regulations to restrict the marketing of harmful foods to children, and proper funding of education by the National Treasury to remove the need for corporate partnerships.

The statement critiques current biodiversity financing mechanisms as unjust and insufficient, highlighting how the global financial sector drives biodiversity loss through credits to extractive industries and predatory debt cycles. It argues that 'false solutions' like biodiversity offsets and green bonds often facilitate greenwashing or profit from destruction. The document calls for a system change that prioritizes direct funding for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs), who are identified as the most effective conservation actors but the least funded.

The document critiques the current financial mechanisms of the UN Convention on Biological Diversity, highlighting how the Global Environment Facility and private finance models perpetuate biodiversity loss. It identifies the role of banks in funding extractive industries and the 'predatory debt' cycles that force developing nations into nature-destroying exports. The author rejects biodiversity offsets and green bonds as 'false solutions' and calls for direct funding mechanisms for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs).