Search Climate Insights Directory

The Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) 2022 Annual Results Report details the organization's progress across three impact areas: reducing climate risk, promoting sustainable resource use and resilient ecosystems, and improving health and well-being. Key achievements include contributing to the COP27 decision to establish a loss and damage fund, developing the Global Environmental Impacts of Consumption (GEIC) indicator adopted at COP15, and implementing water management master plans in Bolivia. The report highlights the use of digital tools like LEAP, WEAP, and Trase to inform policy in various regions, including Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Organizationally, SEI reports an increase in scientific publications, a diversification of funding sources, and the implementation of a global monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) procedure.

WRI's 2023-2027 Strategic Plan shifts the organization from a focus on commitments to delivering tangible impact on the ground. The strategy centers on three interconnected global goals: improving human well-being (People), protecting ecosystem health (Nature), and limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees C (Climate). To achieve these, WRI targets transitions in three 'Human-Centered Systems'—food, land and water; energy; and cities—supported by shifts in 'Enabling Systems' including economics, finance, and governance. The plan prioritizes 12 focus countries and a network of 25 priority cities, utilizing a new results framework based on theories of change to measure progress toward 2027 and 2030 targets.

The World Resources Institute (WRI) responds to a 2021 external review that found the organization achieved 71% of its 2018-2022 strategic targets. WRI commits to improving its monitoring and evaluation systems, increasing flexible funding, and deepening the integration of poverty, gender, and social equity (PGSE) into its operations. The organization plans to create new senior roles to enhance strategic alignment and global network performance, while balancing high-quality research with the urgency of climate action.

The document examines DARPA's contribution to U.S. national security through high-risk, high-reward research, specifically highlighting its role in enabling COVID-19 vaccine development via earlier mRNA investments. It identifies internal risks—such as leadership gaps in biological expertise and high personnel turnover—and proposes structural reforms. Key recommendations include lengthening Program Manager terms, creating a discretionary 'seedling' budget for innovative ideas, expanding the search for international performers, and renaming the Biological Technologies Office to the Biological Sciences Office to broaden its scope. The authors argue that DARPA must better align its aggressive timelines with the inherent constraints of biological research and improve transitions to commercial or military partners to avoid the 'Valley of Death'.

The report analyzes the transition to virtual meetings for the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) during the COVID-19 pandemic. It finds that while virtual formats increased participation and reduced costs, they hindered informal networking. Survey results indicate a high level of satisfaction with the organization of CoP-29, though there is a noted need for better introductory materials for new participants and more frequent communication between sessions via Zoom and newsletters.

The document outlines a proposed hybrid membership model for WACC to increase engagement among younger generations and diverse justice actors. It emphasizes the need for a more granular Theory of Change and the implementation of a tiered membership system—ranging from full governance roles to free subscriptions—to build a broader network while maintaining the association's unique identity.

The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) is undergoing an organizational transformation to center justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion (JEDI) following a 2020 racial reckoning. The organization has identified that previous decentralized efforts failed to address structural inequities for BIPOC staff and that rapid growth outpaced its human resource capacity. To address this, UCS is integrating racial equity into its technical analysis and policy advocacy, recruiting diverse leadership, and establishing a dedicated JEDI office and Advisory Committee. Key goals include promoting equitable outcomes for overburdened communities and redefining a unified organizational vision to better integrate science with JEDI principles.

The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) admits that despite efforts to diversify staff over the last decade, it has failed to address a culture of microaggressions and structural racism, leaving leadership largely white. In response to a public resignation letter from a Black employee and broader social unrest, the organization is implementing reforms to increase the role of staff of color in decision-making, accelerate their hiring into management, and engage the board of directors through a Diversity Equity and Inclusion Task Force.

The SEI Strategy 2015–2019 establishes a framework to bridge science and policy through three primary delivery areas: scientific research, policy engagement, and capacity development. The institute aims to shift from traditional reporting toward a more integrated approach that includes behavioral science, geopolitics, and targeted communication. Central to this strategy is the launch of 'SEI Initiatives'—specialized research hubs focusing on critical issues like climate finance, fossil fuels, and the water-energy-food nexus. The document also details the enabling infrastructure required for these goals, including the PMEC monitoring system and a suite of analytical tools such as LEAP and WEAP, while emphasizing the need to engage 'hard-to-reach' stakeholders in the private sector.

The Canadian Climate Institute has implemented a series of organizational changes to integrate Indigenous perspectives into its climate research and governance. These include creating a leadership role for Indigenous research, establishing cultural leave policies, and implementing an Indigenous peer-review process based on respect, relevance, reciprocity, and responsibility. The Institute also focuses on amplifying Indigenous climate leadership through case studies, research partnerships, and the adoption of guidelines from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

The briefing argues that the IAI must expand its capacity for scientific synthesis and integration to bridge the gap between research and policy. It emphasizes that a flexible, non-hierarchical organizational structure is essential for the IAI to effectively translate complex global change data into actionable information for regional decision-makers, while cautioning against the introduction of rigid hierarchical roles.

The report examines the American Statistical Association's (ASA) financial ties to the fossil fuel industry and its public stance on climate change. While the ASA has endorsed the scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change and lacks evidence of direct corporate sponsorship from fossil fuel companies, it holds $21.9 million in publicly traded securities without a public ethical investment policy or disclosure of where these funds are held. Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) argues that this lack of transparency makes it impossible to rule out investments in fossil fuels, which would contradict the ASA's own ethical guidelines and the goals of the Paris Agreement.