Search Climate Insights Directory

The document examines the critical role of livestock in Africa's food security and GDP, contrasting low-input agroecological systems with industrial models. It argues that industrial livestock production is unsuitable for the African context due to its negative environmental and social impacts. The brief identifies key hurdles, such as chronic underfunding and policy marginalisation, and proposes specific funding levers for philanthropic investment in disease prevention, rangeland management, and adaptive local breeds to build climate resilience.

The report estimates that CAD 346.6 million is provided annually via national grants for natural infrastructure in Canada, with CAD 98.4 million reaching the Prairie provinces from combined federal and provincial sources. It finds that while conservation is a common objective in funding programs, the majority of actual spending is directed toward restored ecosystems (57%) and engineered systems (41.1%), with conserved ecosystems receiving only 1.7% of funding. The Natural Infrastructure Fund (NIF) is identified as the only fund explicitly targeting natural infrastructure projects.

The Union of Concerned Scientists reports that US federal agencies invest only $16.2 million annually in farmworker health research, amounting to approximately $6.75 per worker. The analysis highlights significant gaps in research for underrepresented populations and calls for increased funding through the 2023 food and farm bill, alongside broader policy changes regarding pesticide regulation, labor protections, and immigration rights to address systemic exploitation and climate-driven risks like extreme heat.

The Union of Concerned Scientists found that between FY 2019 and FY 2022, the NIH, CDC, and NIFA allocated an average of $16.2 million annually to farmworker health research, amounting to approximately $6.75 per worker. The report highlights critical data gaps regarding the synergistic effects of extreme heat and pesticide exposure, as well as a lack of research focusing on women, LGBTQ+, and Indigenous farmworkers. It recommends doubling NIFA funding to at least $16.2 million per year and increasing the use of community-based participatory research.

The document argues that the U.S. must address unstable biodefense funding and the tendency to cut budgets during crises. Drawing on the success of Operation Warp Speed, the authors propose a 10-year commitment of $10 billion annually to both the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Department of Defense (DoD) to counter rising biological threats, including lab accidents and advances in synthetic biology.

The document provides the technical appendix for a study on federal investments in sustainable nutrition science. It describes the use of the NIH Federal RePORTER database to identify projects that simultaneously address food production, human nutrition, and environmental or climate impacts. The analysis identified 53 unique projects meeting these criteria, with reported funding totaling $41.1 million over the 2016–2019 period. It also catalogues federal recommendations from 2010 to 2021 urging a shift toward interdisciplinary, systems-based research to integrate sustainability into nutrition policy and food systems.

The briefing analyzes Green Climate Fund (GCF) funding proposals from 2015 to July 2018, finding that interventions for energy access receive significantly less funding than other energy projects and largely neglect low-income and 'high-impact' countries in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.

The paper finds that the Adaptation Fund provides limited support for ecosystem-related activities, with only 15% of funding allocated to such projects as of 2016, and most of these focusing on human-centric ecosystem services rather than ecological resilience.

The document examines the growth of military research and development (R&D) spending and the increasing integration of military objectives into academic and educational institutions in the UK and USA. It critiques the 'Revolution in Military Affairs' (RMA) as a failing high-technology approach to security and highlights a significant funding imbalance where military R&D far outweighs spending on climate change, health, and poverty reduction. The authors argue that this militarisation marginalises non-offensive security strategies and threatens academic freedom and the civilian skills base.

The report evaluates the EU's approach to combating the illicit trade of small arms and light weapons (SALW) and managing explosive remnants of war (ERW). It argues that while the EU has established a Small Arms Strategy and various funding instruments, there is a need for greater policy coherence, a formal extension of mine action assistance to include ERW, and a more comprehensive approach that links security and development. The document specifically examines the situation in North Africa, highlighting gaps in border management and the need for technical assistance in stockpile management and mine clearance.

The document outlines federal grants and tax credits from the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) to support the deployment of electric vehicle (EV) charging and hydrogen fueling infrastructure. It details specific funding categories including charging/fueling, supply chain development, emissions monitoring, and state planning, while highlighting active zero-emission freight corridor projects along I-95, I-80, and I-10. The guide also provides a three-phase strategic framework for states to establish priorities, communicate with stakeholders, and monitor performance to maximize the use of these federal resources.