Search Climate Insights Directory

The report outlines technical and operational measures to mitigate methane emissions from landfills in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), where waste management emissions accounted for 10,258 kt in 2023. It categorizes disposal sites into dumpsites, controlled landfills, and sanitary landfills, emphasizing that daily operational practices—such as waste compaction, daily cover application, and leachate management—significantly impact emissions even without advanced gas capture infrastructure. The document details specific equipment requirements, slope stability guidelines, and gas collection system designs, noting that while optimal capture efficiencies can exceed 80%, many regional facilities operate between 20% and 60%. Additionally, it advocates for organic waste diversion through composting and anaerobic digestion, drawing on European precedents, and stresses the necessity of multi-level capacity building for operators and policymakers to ensure sustainable mitigation.

The document outlines the role of EV carshare in addressing urban mobility, affordability, and air quality. It compares three primary business models—cooperative, for-profit, and nonprofit—and details operational considerations such as site selection, reservation structures, and the critical challenge of insurance. It highlights the potential for EV carshare to reduce private vehicle ownership and development costs, citing a specific example from Austin, Texas, where parking requirement reductions saved $38.5 million in housing costs. The guide emphasizes the need for strategic partnerships, diversified revenue streams, and iterative program design to ensure long-term financial viability and equitable access.

The report argues that community trust is a critical lever for the success of next-generation geothermal development in the U.S., as public awareness of the technology remains low and concerns regarding seismicity and water use are prevalent. Based on research including focus groups, surveys, and developer interviews, the document outlines five core best practices: proactive and consistent communication, tailoring messages to the public's needs, addressing local priorities, maintaining transparency, and utilizing trusted messengers. It emphasizes that 'boots on the ground' in-person interaction is superior to virtual tools and that developers must be willing to adjust project designs based on community input to avoid the opposition currently facing other renewable energy projects.

The report identifies critical failure modes in ground-mount solar PV systems exposed to extreme winds, such as the failure of top-down clamps and low-cycle fatigue in module frames. It recommends high-load modules (4,000 Pa uplift), through-bolting with specialized washers, and dual-post foundation designs to improve survivability in hurricane-prone regions.

The guide advocates for a holistic community engagement strategy to secure a 'social license' to operate, reducing the risk of permitting delays and project cancellations for energy and infrastructure deployments.

This guide explains how model contracts—both generic and nationally tailored—can help governments ensure responsible investment in agriculture. It details how these templates can integrate international standards, prevent problematic omissions, flag risky clauses like stabilization provisions, and promote transparency and legal harmonization.

The document identifies five critical areas for improving the success rate of first-of-a-kind (FOAK) industrial heat decarbonization projects: customer relationship management, site evaluation, project scoping, expertise/oversight, and contract drafting. It argues that these projects are prone to a 'snowball effect' of pitfalls—such as inaccurate site evaluations and unclear scopes—that can lead to project cancellation. By implementing strategic partnerships, detailed early-stage engineering, and flexible contracting, the document suggests that FOAK projects can move from 'project to product,' potentially unlocking a 2%–5% overall emissions reduction in the United States.

The report examines Community Benefits Agreements (CBAs) as legally binding contracts between developers and communities to ensure equitable outcomes in energy transitions. Through nine case studies and an analysis of DOE, DOT, and EPA guidelines, it identifies critical failure points—such as lack of representative stakeholders and poor enforceability—and proposes best practices for planning, negotiation, and monitoring to better align project development with community needs.

The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) outlines a values-based approach to scientist-community partnerships, emphasizing mutual respect, transparency, and the integration of community and Indigenous knowledge. The guide provides a step-by-step process for initiating collaborations, overcoming professional and social barriers, and ensuring equitable outcomes through tools like Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) and restorative justice practices.

Reclaim Finance argues that current financial engagement for climate action is limited, citing the failure of Climate Action 100+ to secure comprehensive transition plans from all target companies. The guide recommends that investors increase transparency, set time-bound public demands focused on 1.5°C alignment rather than mere transparency, and implement systematic annual escalation sanctions for non-compliance.

The guide argues that banks should move beyond siloed engagement to a coordinated 'multi-level' approach involving clients, sectors, and policy makers. It highlights the need for internal coordination led by sustainability teams, refined escalation processes for non-compliant clients, and scaled sector-level engagement through platforms like the Poseidon Principles.

The document outlines 13 best practices for climate reporting, emphasizing the need to connect stories to climate causes and consequences, integrate climate coverage across all news beats, and center climate justice by highlighting marginalized and Indigenous voices. It advises journalists to avoid jargon, report on solutions alongside problems, and remain skeptical of greenwashing and corporate spin. Furthermore, it argues against platforming climate denialists in the name of balance and encourages the use of representative visuals and self-care for reporters facing burnout.

The 'journalist Field Guide: Navigating Climate Misinformation' offers a framework for media professionals to handle deceptive climate content. It advocates for the 'truth sandwich' debunking method, warns against 'false balance' in reporting, and provides technical advice to avoid amplifying bad actors, such as using archive links instead of direct URLs. The guide integrates academic research on inoculation and strategic amplification while highlighting how social media algorithms and vested interests fuel climate myths.

RMI outlines five strategic steps for US electric utilities to foster equitable community engagement: identifying underserved populations using measurable criteria, compensating community participants for their expertise, ensuring linguistic and cultural accessibility in outreach, partnering with communities for program design and wealth building, and co-creating metrics to track progress.

The document outlines the business case and technical process for seafood companies to adopt Science-Based Targets (SBTs) to mitigate climate change. It highlights that while seafood generally has a lower carbon footprint than land-based proteins, the industry faces significant risks from ocean warming and acidification. The guide details a process of data collection, GHG accounting using Life Cycle Assessments (LCA), and target setting through the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi). Key reduction strategies include the electrification of fishing vessels, the development of low-carbon aquaculture feed, and the reduction of air freight. It emphasizes that Scope 3 emissions—particularly from feed and transport—represent the largest challenge and require pre-competitive collaboration across the value chain.

The document outlines the need for a shift from mere representation to a lasting and impactful 'Indigenous media presence' to avoid stereotypes and sensationalism. It introduces eight principles developed through research with Indigenous leaders, media agents, and NGOs across 10 countries in Central and South America, aiming to support Indigenous self-determination and sustainable climate solutions.

The report examines the drivers of global deforestation, specifically focusing on the role of agriculture and cattle production. It highlights China's significant influence as a major importer of these commodities and proposes a two-pronged approach—short-term demand signals and long-term systemic support—to transition toward deforestation-free supply chains. The document analyzes various certification schemes, traceability tools, and jurisdictional approaches, while providing case studies from companies like COFCO International and Mars Wrigley to illustrate practical implementation of sustainability policies.

The report examines the procurement processes of vertically integrated utilities in the United States, highlighting how monopsony power and financial incentives often lead to the over-procurement of capacity and a bias toward self-built, gas-fired generation. Using Xcel Colorado as a model, the authors recommend five best practices for regulators: determining technology-neutral needs through resource planning, requiring competitive all-source bidding with robust evaluation, conducting advance review of procurement terms, ensuring utility ownership does not conflict with competitive bidding, and upholding rules for fairness and transparency. The report analyzes case studies from Colorado, New Mexico, Georgia, Minnesota, Indiana, Texas, California, Virginia, and North Carolina to illustrate the effectiveness of all-source RFPs in reducing costs and increasing renewable energy deployment.

The document analyzes the legal frameworks and practical trends associated with terminating bilateral investment treaties (BITs), specifically focusing on the roles of termination and survival clauses. It details three primary methods of termination—by consent with renegotiation, by consent without renegotiation, and unilateral termination—while providing strategic considerations for states to mitigate investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) risks. The guide also suggests modern drafting approaches for new BITs to avoid the pitfalls of 'tacit renewal' and long survival periods.

The document analyzes the increasing trend of states terminating old-generation bilateral investment treaties (BITs) due to perceived imbalances in the investment regime. It details the legal mechanisms for termination under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, compares 'tacit renewal' and 'fixed-term' termination clauses, and discusses the impact of 'survival clauses' (sunset clauses). The guide outlines three primary paths for termination: mutual consent (with or without renegotiation), multilateral instruments, and unilateral denunciation. It provides strategic advice on neutralizing survival clauses and recommends that states actively track key treaty dates to avoid missing narrow termination windows.