Search Climate Insights Directory

The guide uses a series of realistic, simulated scenarios to explore the complexities of involving citizens in sustainable energy projects, such as wind farm siting and energy efficiency upgrades. It focuses on three primary dimensions of success: social legitimacy, institutional sustainability, and political effectiveness. Through 39 different sections, the document analyzes the trade-offs between different engagement models—participatory, deliberative, and hybrid—and provides strategies for managing conflicts, handling technical constraints, and navigating the influence of higher-level government bodies and political election cycles.

The guide explains the mechanisms of GHG reporting for corporations and utilities, detailing the GHG Protocol's three scopes of emissions. It specifically examines Scope 2 accounting, contrasting location-based and market-based methods and emphasizing the importance of supplier-specific emission factors provided by utilities. The document also outlines the reporting requirements for utilities, such as those under The Climate Registry, and discusses the differences between GHG accounting and renewable energy accounting.

The document outlines five key stages for hosting a public education event: identifying partners, coordinating logistics, creating an outreach plan, promoting the event, and following up with attendees. It emphasizes inclusivity, particularly reaching out to those most affected by the issue, and suggests leveraging community partnerships to build power and influence. Practical advice is provided on venue selection, accessibility, catering, and the use of social media for real-time publicity and long-term community building.

The document outlines the benefits of collaboration for scientific advocacy, such as widening reach, building credibility, and pursuing larger goals. It suggests scouting for strengths within personal networks, local communities, and academic institutions, while emphasizing the importance of ethical alignment with environmental justice and public health equity groups. The guide provides a framework for maintaining positive partnerships through clear agreements, inclusive decision-making, and fair distribution of credit.

The ScienTIST advocacy Toolkit outlines a structured approach for scientists to introduce themselves to policymakers, emphasizing the importance of establishing credibility as both a technical expert and a constituent. It provides a specific script and strategic advice to ensure the 'ask' remains the central focus of the interaction, while offering indicators to measure the success of such engagements beyond an immediate commitment.

The document provides a toolkit for scientists to use public events, such as town halls, to influence policymakers. It recommends preparing concise, concrete, and compelling questions, positioning oneself as a technical resource to staff, and following up through thank-you notes or local media to maintain pressure and build connections.

The guide explains that the carbon-reduction impact of renewable energy projects varies by location because different projects displace different types of power plants. It argues that relying on proximity to operations as a proxy for quality may limit environmental benefits, suggesting instead that buyers target the most carbon-intensive areas to maximize avoided emissions.

The document advises federal scientists to maintain detailed, contemporaneous records of political interference or process changes that diminish the role of science in decision-making. It outlines best practices for secure note-taking, distinguishes between personal notes and official agency records, and explains the legal criteria for protected whistleblowing under the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act.

The document outlines the process of declaring 'free territories' as a political practice of autonomy and self-determination. It provides a framework for preventive and reactive strategies, emphasizing the need for information dissemination, network organization, and propositional agendas to protect territories from extractivist models and corporate appropriation. The guide details specific regional examples, including mining-free zones in Mesoamerica, gasfield-free communities in Australia, and GMO-free regions in Europe and Costa Rica.

The document outlines a strategic framework for communications within the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) process, emphasizing the need for tailored messaging and stakeholder engagement across planning, implementation, and monitoring phases.

The document advises Cape Town residents to assume untreated water from boreholes, rain tanks, and springs is unsafe due to microbes and chemicals. It recommends testing water against the SANS 241 standard and suggests boiling as the simplest microbial treatment. It also provides a comparison of various household treatment methods and guidelines for sterile storage using food-grade plastics.

The ALivE tool guides users through a three-phase process: collecting data on livelihoods and ecosystems, analyzing risks and prioritizing EbA options, and integrating these options into policy and planning. It emphasizes a participatory approach, gender sensitivity, and adaptive management to ensure sustainable climate resilience.

The ALivE tool is a decision-support system that guides users through a three-phase process to build climate resilience. Phase 1 involves gathering data via secondary research and participatory methods. Phase 2 uses the tool to analyse risks, identify and prioritise EbA options based on effectiveness and feasibility, and design project activities. Phase 3 focuses on integrating these options into broader policies and planning processes to ensure sustainability and scale.

The guide introduces the ALivE tool, which uses a step-by-step process to analyze the relationship between ecosystems, livelihoods, and climate change. It defines Ecosystem-based Adaptation (EbA) as the use of biodiversity and ecosystem services as part of an adaptation strategy to help people adapt to the adverse effects of climate change. The tool guides users through five modules: understanding the context, analyzing vulnerabilities, identifying EbA options, planning implementation, and establishing monitoring and evaluation (M&E) frameworks. It emphasizes participatory approaches, gender sensitivity, and the integration of EbA into national policies and National Adaptation Plans (NAPs).

The Carbon-Free City Handbook: Financing emphasizes the role of cities in expanding capital access and innovative financing mechanisms for both public sector city-led projects and private sector initiatives.

The guide outlines five key strategies for corporate sustainability champions: aligning proposals with the firm's specific values and CEO's passions, building a financial business case using metrics like net present value, assembling diverse internal teams, starting with low-risk pilot projects to prove value, and building collaborative relationships with skeptical stakeholders, including finance executives.

The document argues that narrative forms are more effective than traditional graphs and numbers for communicating science because they help audiences process and remember complex information. It provides a set of building blocks for constructing climate stories, including understanding audience values and using the language of risk, and suggests an 'and, but, therefore' structure to simplify scientific messaging.

The document emphasizes that trust in both the messenger and the message determines how the public engages with scientific evidence and its policy implications. It notes that while trust in scientists is generally high in Europe, it varies by political ideology; specifically, politically conservative groups are more skeptical of 'impact scientists' (such as climate scientists) compared to 'production scientists' like engineers or chemists.

The document explains the framework of California's Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), which requires local Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSAs) to achieve groundwater sustainability by 2040 (or 2042 for low-priority basins). It details the four main components of a Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP): basin description, sustainable goals to avoid six 'undesirable outcomes', management projects, and monitoring plans. The guide emphasizes that sustainability is a social and technical definition determined by local community values. It provides a framework for understanding water budgets and hydrological models, stressing the need for open-source software and the integration of community values into technical data. Finally, it outlines pathways for public engagement, such as joining GSA boards or advisory committees, and lists critical questions to ensure transparency and accountability in the planning process.

The guide argues that traditional business models focused on increasing sales are unsustainable given growing global populations and industrialization. It proposes a three-step analytical process: conducting a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to identify environmental hotspots, multiplying these impacts by projected demand growth to 2030, and analyzing the broader industry context, including competitors and community needs. The author suggests that companies must either innovate their products or shift their paradigms toward services—such as mobility services instead of just selling cars—to meet sustainability targets and avoid obsolescence.