Search Climate Insights Directory

The Clean Air Task Force supports the EPA's proposed new source performance standards (NSPS) for fossil-fueled power plants, which would limit emissions to 1,000 lbs. of CO2 per megawatt-hour. The author asserts that carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technology is currently available and cost-effective, enabling new coal plants to meet or exceed these standards. The document highlights existing commercial CCS projects and the potential for the enhanced oil recovery (EOR) industry to create commercial demand for captured anthropogenic CO2, providing a hedge against future emissions if natural gas prices rise.

The report evaluates five brick-firing technologies: Fixed Chimney Bulls Trench Kiln (FCBTK), Zig-zag Kiln, Vertical Shaft Brick Kiln (VSBK), Down-Draught Kiln (DDK), and Tunnel Kiln. VSBK is identified as the most energy-efficient and lowest emitting technology, while DDK is the least efficient. Zig-zag kilns are proposed as the most logical replacement for the prevalent FCBTKs due to lower investment costs and better performance. The study highlights significant barriers to modernization in India, including labor shortages, rising fuel costs, and land lease restrictions. It recommends a roadmap including the phase-out of FCBTKs by 2020, promotion of internal fuels through semi-mechanization, and the launch of a national brick development programme to improve profitability and working conditions.

A Clean Air Task Force (CATF) study indicates that new CNG buses are not necessarily superior to new diesel buses regarding air quality or climate impact. While CNG buses may have marginally lower particulate matter and volatile organic compound emissions, they can have higher nitrogen oxide and greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, the higher purchase price of CNG buses may limit the number of older, high-emitting vehicles retired per dollar of capital funding, potentially resulting in lower fleet-wide emission reductions compared to a diesel fleet update. The climate impact of CNG is heavily dependent on methane leakage rates during production and the choice of Global Warming Potential (GWP) timeframes (GWP20 vs GWP100). Despite these factors, low fuel costs and federal funding structures incentivize transit agencies to choose CNG.

The report examines how the DoD's unique capacity for end-to-end research, development, and procurement can be leveraged for energy innovation. It analyzes three case studies—gas turbines, alternative fuels, and soldier-portable power—and compares the innovation models of DARPA and ARPA-E. While the DoD is a powerful engine for technology, the report notes that its contributions to climate goals depend on the alignment of energy needs with the military's core security mission. It highlights the 'Installation Energy Test Bed' as a successful model for overcoming the 'Valley of Death' in technology commercialization.

The report evaluates advanced nuclear reactor designs to provide affordable, low-carbon energy. It focuses on small modular light water reactors (smLWRs) for their deployment flexibility and safety; high-temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs) for their high thermal efficiency and process heat applications; and fluoride salt-cooled high-temperature reactors (FHRs) for their potential for breakthrough economics due to compact size and high power density.

The analysis finds that while CNG buses offer long-term fuel cost savings and lower long-term GHG emissions (GWP100), they have higher upfront costs and higher short-term climate impacts (GWP20) due to fugitive methane emissions. In capital-constrained environments, new diesel buses may provide greater fleet-wide reductions in criteria pollutants because more units can be purchased and older buses retired per dollar spent.

The author asserts that setting CO2 performance standards for coal-fired power plants is the primary environmental and energy policy priority for 2012, as these plants are the largest stationary sources of carbon dioxide. While the Mercury and Air Toxics Rule (MATS) and the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) protect public health, they do not reduce carbon dioxide emissions. The document emphasizes that building new plants without carbon controls is unjustifiable and that such standards are necessary for the U.S. to meet its commitment of a 17 percent reduction in emissions below 2005 levels by 2020.

The Clean Air Task Force criticizes a proposed EPA update to air emissions limits for the oil and natural gas industry, stating that while the rules make progress, they fail to directly regulate methane. The author asserts that the industry is the largest man-made source of methane in the US and that cost-effective measures to stop leaks and dumping could provide climate benefits equivalent to retiring hundreds of coal-fired generators while saving the industry over $30 million annually.

The Clean Air Task Force argues against the 'zero-sum' race metaphor between the US and China regarding clean energy, suggesting instead that China's capacity for large-scale demonstration and investment provides a 'test bed' that can benefit the US through 'reverse innovation' and capital flow. While acknowledging trade disputes and IP theft, the author suggests the US focus on high-end design and systems integration rather than low-end commodity manufacturing, which is increasingly automated or cost-prohibitive to ship.

The document highlights the rapid loss of Arctic sea ice and the resulting pressure to exploit undiscovered oil and gas reserves, warning that such activities create a feedback loop of increased emissions and further melting. It emphasizes the risks of Greenland Ice Sheet melting and shifting global weather patterns, while calling for a 'zero emissions Arctic campaign' to enforce the safest, zero-emitting practices for drilling and shipping.

The report advocates for a 'Reliability-Only Dispatch' mechanism to ensure that coal- and oil-fired power plants granted extensions to comply with the Air Toxics Rule operate only when essential for grid reliability. This approach is proposed as an alternative to 'blanket' one-year extensions requested by industry groups, which the author argues would unnecessarily prolong public exposure to hazardous air pollutants. Modeling of a hypothetical scenario suggests that this targeted dispatch approach could prevent nearly 4,000 premature deaths and save $29 billion in health damages compared to unrestricted extensions for the same units.

The authors assert that avoiding the worst consequences of climate change requires virtually zeroing out electricity-related carbon emissions by mid-century, which necessitates the deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) for all fossil fuels. They highlight the critical risk posed by new coal power plants in China and India and criticize the U.S. policy approach as 'ad hoc and woefully inadequate', citing the shelving of American Electric Power's Mountaineer project. To drive deployment and lower costs, the authors recommend that the Obama Administration propose strong new source performance standards, the Department of Energy reform funding for initiatives like the Clean Coal Power Initiative, and Congress adopt significant industry incentives.

The document advocates for the repeal of conventional biofuel subsidies, citing the high cost of the Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit (VEETC) and the environmental and economic damages caused by the Renewable Fuel Standard. It highlights that corn ethanol can result in higher net carbon dioxide emissions than gasoline and contributes to global food price increases by diverting crops from food production to fuel.

The document details the severe health risks of diesel particulate matter, including 21,000 annual deaths and increased cancer risks. It advocates for the Diesel Emission Reduction Act (DERA) to clean up the existing fleet of 11 million heavy-duty engines and proposes the Clean Construction Act of 2011 to integrate emission controls into federally funded transportation projects, capping costs at 1% of project totals.

The author contends that natural gas acts as a 'palliative' rather than a cure for climate change, noting that while it emits less CO2 per kilowatt-hour than coal, its long-term use without carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) is imprudent due to carbon inertia. The text emphasizes the urgent need to eliminate methane leaks from gas, oil, and coal production, which are potent greenhouse gas sources. Furthermore, it warns against over-reliance on the 'shale gale' and the assumption that shale gas will remain cheap in the long term, urging a shift toward zero-carbon energy technologies.

The Clean Air Task Force (CATF) proposes a 'Clean Construction' policy for U.S. transportation projects, requiring the use of emission control technologies like Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF) in PM2.5 non-attainment and maintenance areas. The proposal suggests funding these upgrades through project change orders, capped at 1% of total project costs, to mitigate severe health risks associated with diesel pollution while ensuring a fair bidding process for contractors.

The author contends that coal- and oil-fired power plants have lacked national air toxics regulations for a decade, leading to an 'intolerable situation' for public health and the environment. The text asserts that the EPA's economic benefit analyses are incomplete because they primarily measure particulate matter reductions while ignoring the benefits of reducing carcinogens, heavy metals, and respiratory irritants. It highlights that mercury controls can yield rapid environmental benefits and that some existing sources have already achieved mercury emission reductions of 'upwards of 98% from inlet' with minimal additional investment. The author argues that robust standards, alongside the Clean Air Transport Rule and New Source Performance Standards for greenhouse gases, would drive technological innovation in the energy generation sector.

The Clean Air Task Force criticizes the EPA's 'Boiler MACT' rule for weakening emission limits and failing to reflect best performers. The organization calls for the upcoming Power Plant Air Toxics Proposal to implement rigorous, state-of-the-art standards for utility steam generating units burning coal and oil, noting that the EPA and other bodies have sufficient data to regulate mercury, heavy metals, and acid gases.

The author supports the EPA's plan to propose carbon performance standards for power plants by July 2011, arguing that such regulations are necessary in the absence of federal legislation to drive clean energy investment and reduce harmful emissions. The text emphasizes that while coal-fired plants are a major source of pollution and 40% of U.S. carbon emissions, phased-in regulation and the development of a robust carbon capture and storage (CCS) industry are the most effective paths toward climate stabilization.

The Hindu Kush-Himalayan-Tibetan (HKHT) region is warming twice as fast as the global average, with temperatures increasing by 1.2 °C over the last 120 years. This warming, driven by CO2 and black carbon (BC), is causing widespread glacier retreat and a weakening of the South Asian monsoon system. Black carbon, a byproduct of incomplete combustion from fossil fuels and biomass, reduces snow albedo and heats the lower atmosphere via Atmospheric Brown Clouds (ABCs), potentially playing a role as significant as CO2 in melting Himalayan glaciers. These changes threaten water security for millions, including 500 million people in the Ganges River Basin, and increase the frequency of glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs).