Search Climate Insights Directory

The report critiques the IFC's Green Equity Approach (GEA), noting that while it aims to phase out coal by 2030, it contains loopholes allowing continued fossil fuel support. It proposes ten essentials for reform, including extending the ban to oil and gas, closing underwriting loopholes, ensuring gender equality, and implementing full public disclosure of sub-projects.

The report critiques the Indonesian government's strategy of using natural gas as a 'bridge' fuel, specifically focusing on planned gas infrastructure in Bali, including a Floating Storage Regasification Unit (FSRU) and several gas power plants (PLTG). It argues that gas is not a clean energy source due to methane leaks and carbon emissions, which contribute to the extreme weather and water crises already affecting Bali. The document highlights social and environmental damages from existing gas projects, such as the PLTGU Pemaron, and argues that Bali's significant renewable energy potential—estimated up to 26 GW—should be prioritized over fossil fuels to achieve true energy independence and climate resilience.

The document critiques the Indonesian Ministry of Forestry's plan to allocate 20 million hectares of forest for 'food and energy estates'. It argues that this plan constitutes a 'legalization of deforestation' that contradicts Indonesia's global climate commitments (NDC, CBD) and its own FoLU Net Sink 2030 target. The brief highlights the risk of corporate capture, the displacement of Indigenous peoples, and the potential for severe human rights abuses, particularly if the projects are designated as National Strategic Projects (PSN). It emphasizes that food and energy should be treated as human rights rather than business commodities, advocating for local food sovereignty and community-led energy solutions over large-scale industrial estates.

The document critiques Indonesia's energy policies for prioritizing coal-fired power plants (PLTU) despite escalating climate disasters and socio-economic losses. It highlights the filing of two lawsuits at the Jakarta Administrative Court (PTUN Jakarta) by environmental organizations and affected citizens to challenge the RUKN 2025-2060 and RUPTL 2025-2034, arguing that these plans extend the life of fossil fuel infrastructure and ignore the health and economic impacts on local communities.

The document details a legal challenge by LBH Padang against the Indonesian Ministry of Environment and Forestry (KLHK) for failing to enforce sanctions against the PLTU Ombilin power plant. It highlights severe health issues among local children, high rates of acute respiratory infections (ISPA) in the Talawi district, and repeated pollution incidents involving fly ash and bottom ash (FABA). The briefing asserts that the plant's continued operation hinders Indonesia's emission reduction goals and violates the health rights of the local population.

The report provides an economic valuation of the environmental and social losses resulting from the Rempang Eco City project on Pulau Rempang. It finds that the average monthly income of local households (Rp32.77 million) is significantly higher than government claims (Rp3 million), and that the projected environmental losses per household (Rp109 million per month) are more than three times their income. The document criticizes the project's 'green economy' narrative, highlighting the destruction of mangroves, loss of traditional livelihoods in fisheries and agriculture, and the marginalization of indigenous communities through forced relocation and criminalization.

The report argues that biomass co-firing in East Java is plagued by economic failure, ecological damage, and illegal practices. It finds that Perum Perhutani's energy plantation forests (HTE) have caused significant economic losses for local farmers and are financially unviable for the company. Furthermore, it reveals that PLTU Paiton relies on sawdust from illegal sawmills, often involving stolen timber, and that some suppliers manipulate biomass weight by adding water with the complicity of plant officials. The report also notes that major wood pellet exporters, such as PT Kaliandra Merah Nusantara, primarily export to South Korea rather than supplying domestic power plants.

This report by Trend Asia, CELIOS, and CREA identifies the 20 most toxic coal-fired power plants (CFPPs) in Indonesia, termed the "Toxic Twenty." It analyzes the severe public health, economic, and environmental costs associated with these facilities, arguing that current government retirement roadmaps are insufficient and often delayed by a reliance on unproven technologies like co-firing and CCS/CCUS. The report provides detailed case studies for several plants, documenting widespread respiratory illnesses, loss of traditional livelihoods in fisheries and agriculture, and significant negative impacts on regional GDP.

The report examines the Jawa 9 and 10 coal-fired power plant projects in Cilegon, Banten, highlighting severe risks to public health and the environment. It argues that the projects are economically flawed, citing a Korean Development Institute (KDI) study that predicted a negative Net Present Value (NPV) for KEPCO. The document details the prevalence of acute respiratory infections (ISPA) among children in Cilegon and the broader ecological damage caused by coal transport and mining. It specifically calls for South Korean financiers, such as K-Exim and KDB, to withdraw funding to align with the 'Green New Deal' and global climate goals, noting that Indonesia's emission standards are significantly lower than those in South Korea.

The report examines the Java 9 and 10 Coal Power Plant (CPP) projects in Cilegon, Banten, funded by South Korean institutions including K-Exim, KDB, and K-Sure. It argues the investment is 'forced' and 'unprofitable,' citing a KDI pre-feasibility study showing a negative NPV for KEPCO. The document highlights severe health impacts in Banten, where Acute Respiratory Infection (ARI) is prevalent, and notes that the projects exacerbate air pollution and increase vulnerability to pandemics like Covid-19. It further criticizes the use of Ultra Super Critical (USC) technology as insufficient for carbon reduction and points to the risk of natural disasters, such as tsunamis, given the plants' coastal locations. The report concludes that the investment violates South Korea's 'Green New Deal' and calls for the Indonesian government to cancel the projects in favor of renewable energy.

The report identifies the 'Toxic Twenty' coal-fired power plants in Indonesia, estimating that between 2026 and 2050, they will cause 156,000 premature deaths and USD 109 billion in health-related economic losses. It argues that these plants create a net economic drain, reducing regional GDP and destroying livelihoods in agriculture and fisheries, while criticizing the government's reliance on 'false solutions' like biomass co-firing to extend the life of fossil fuel infrastructure.

A joint statement by 45 Indonesian organizations calling for the acceleration of sustainable commodity governance to meet EUDR requirements and global market demands, emphasizing the need for inclusive support for smallholders and Indigenous Peoples.

The report critiques the implementation of biomass co-firing in West Java's coal power plants, specifically PLTU Indramayu and PLTU Pelabuhan Ratu. It argues that the program facilitates 'false' carbon neutrality claims while causing significant deforestation, land conflicts, and ecological damage. The authors highlight a gap between national energy targets and the reality of biomass sourcing, which often relies on illegal logging or 'fraudulent' practices by Perhutani, rather than sustainable energy forests (HTE).

The document outlines a framework for a just energy transition in Indonesia, advocating for a shift from extractive, centralized energy systems to regenerative, democratic ones. It demands transparency in funding mechanisms like JETP, the protection of human rights and indigenous land sovereignty, and the phased closure of all coal-fired power plants (PLTU) by 2040. The authors call for the rejection of 'false solutions' such as gas, nuclear energy, and carbon capture, while urging the government to implement inclusive green jobs and a bottom-up approach to renewable energy infrastructure.

A coalition of 45 Indonesian civil society organizations calls for urgent improvements in the governance of sustainable commodities, specifically timber, palm oil, cocoa, coffee, and rubber, to meet the requirements of the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR). While noting the European Commission's proposal to delay EUDR implementation by 12 months (to December 30, 2025, for large companies and June 30, 2026, for micro and small enterprises), the coalition warns that this delay could slow existing improvement efforts. They urge the government to strengthen existing schemes like ISPO and SVLK, increase supply chain transparency, protect Indigenous peoples' rights through Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC), and provide technical and financial support to smallholders to ensure global competitiveness and support Indonesia's FOLU Net Sink 2030 target.

The report highlights the failure of biomass power plants (PLTBm) in the Mentawai Islands, which operated for less than a year and forced the cutting of indigenous forests due to unsuitable bamboo varieties. It argues that the push for bioenergy is suspicious given the region's higher potential for solar and hydro power. Furthermore, it documents a stark disparity in land control, where large corporate forest concessions (PBPH) threaten natural forests and indigenous territories, while local communities struggle for legal recognition of their ancestral lands.

The document presents a framework for a just energy transition in Indonesia, demanding a shift from extractive, centralistic energy patterns to regenerative, democratic ones. It calls for the gradual closure of all coal-fired power plants by 2040, the rejection of 'false solutions' like fossil gas and nuclear power, and the establishment of a transparent, multi-stakeholder management organ to oversee the process. Central to these demands are the protection of human rights, the inclusion of vulnerable groups in decision-making, and the ensuring of energy affordability and ownership for local communities.

The document details the negative impacts of Harita Group's nickel operations on Obi Island, including marine pollution, forced relocation of residents, and workplace fatalities. It highlights the company's reliance on coal-fired power plants (PLTU) and argues that the IPO of PT Trimegah Bangun Persada Tbk (NCKL) enables further destruction. The text specifically criticizes investors like Glencore and Fidelity International, as well as several global banking underwriters, for breaching net-zero and Paris Agreement commitments by supporting the company.

The document critiques the April 2023 IPO of PT Trimegah Bangun Persada Tbk (NCKL), alleging that the capital increase will fund further environmental degradation and social displacement on Obi Island. It highlights the use of coal-fired power plants (PLTU) for nickel processing, illegal waste disposal into the sea, and workplace fatalities. The report further claims that investors like Glencore and Fidelity International, and several underwriting banks, are violating their net-zero and Paris Agreement commitments by supporting Harita Group.

The document examines the expansion of captive coal power on Obi Island, Indonesia, used to fuel nickel refineries for the electric vehicle battery supply chain. It highlights how the International Finance Corporation (IFC) is indirectly linked to these projects through financial intermediaries like Hana Bank Indonesia and OCBC NISP. The author argues that the IFC's 'Green Equity Approach' contains a loophole that explicitly excludes 'captive coal-fired power plants' from its definition of coal-related projects, allowing continued funding. The report details severe environmental and social impacts on Obi Island, including toxic waste from High-Pressure Acid Leaching (HPAL) refineries, respiratory illnesses, and increased structural poverty for women, while calling for the World Bank Group to close these policy gaps.