Search Climate Insights Directory

The document highlights that just 1% of Bolivia's estimated superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 549 GW of energy capacity, far exceeding the country's 2021 electricity consumption of 10,829 GWh. It argues that this technology could replace coal and gas imports, leverage existing oil and gas subsurface expertise, and require significantly less land than other energy sources.

The document highlights that just 1% of Brazil's superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 341 GW of energy capacity, exceeding the country's projected 2050 electricity demand of 1,309,104 GWh. It argues that this technology could replace all coal and gas imports used for electricity, reduce electricity sector emissions by approximately 88 megatonnes of CO2eq, and leverage existing subsurface expertise from Brazil's oil and gas sector.

The document analyzes methane emissions from Brazil's waste sector, noting that in 2022, the sector contributed 15% of total national methane emissions, with 68% of those stemming from solid waste disposal. It outlines the institutional framework, including the National Solid Waste Policy and the Basic Sanitation Legal Framework, while highlighting significant challenges such as low recycling rates (4%) and the continued use of open dumps (26% of collected municipal solid waste). The factsheet proposes opportunities for mitigation through improved organic waste treatment, methane recovery systems at landfills, and the development of waste-fee systems to finance infrastructure.

The document highlights that just 1% of Brunei's estimated superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 9 GW of energy capacity, generating over 71,162 GWh of electricity. This amount is approximately 12 times Brunei's 2021 electricity consumption of 5,698 GWh. Utilizing this resource could theoretically replace all coal and gas used for electricity production, reducing carbon emissions by about 5 megatonnes, which represents 77% of Brunei's Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) goal of 5.9 megatonnes by 2030. Additionally, the technology is noted for its low land footprint, requiring roughly 12 km² per 1 GW, and its potential to leverage existing subsurface expertise from Brunei's oil and gas sector.

The document highlights that just 1% of Bulgaria's estimated superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 98 GW of energy capacity, generating over 812,237 GWh of electricity. This amount is 17 times the country's 2021 electricity consumption and could theoretically replace all coal and gas used for electricity production, reducing emissions by approximately 21 megatonnes of CO2eq. The report argues that superhot rock geothermal offers a low land-use footprint (12 km² per 1 GW) and provides reliable 24/7 power, which would reduce Bulgaria's dependence on coal (10% imported) and natural gas (96% imported).

The document highlights that Burundi possesses significant superhot rock geothermal resources, with just 1% of its endowment capable of providing 36 GW of energy capacity. While unlikely to meet Burundi's 2030 emissions reduction goals, the technology offers a low-land-footprint, 24/7 renewable energy source that could reduce energy poverty and attract foreign investment.

The document addresses common concerns and misconceptions regarding carbon capture and storage (CCS), asserting that it is a proven technology essential for reaching net-zero emissions, especially in industries like cement and steel where electrification is insufficient. It highlights Europe's significant storage potential and the role of government funding in scaling the technology.

The Clean Air Task Force asserts that the current TEN-E proposal fails to support EU decarbonization by excluding CO2 storage and non-pipeline transport (such as ships, barges, rail, and trucks). The document argues that because geologic storage is unequally distributed across Europe, cross-border storage is a prerequisite for a level playing field in the Single Market. It claims the exclusion of storage contradicts the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance Taxonomy, increases investor risk, and ignores the fact that climate mitigation only materializes at the point of permanent storage.

The document highlights superhot rock geothermal as a high-density, zero-emission energy source that could significantly exceed California's current electricity needs while utilizing existing oil and gas sector expertise.

The document highlights that just 1% of Cambodia's estimated superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 304 GW of energy capacity, far exceeding the country's 2021 electricity consumption of 10,156 GWh. This resource could theoretically replace all coal and electricity imports, reducing electricity sector emissions by approximately 4 megatonnes of CO2eq. Superhot rock geothermal is presented as a land-efficient alternative to other renewables, requiring roughly 12 km² per 1 GW, and as a means to foster socio-economic development through job creation and foreign investment.

The document highlights that just 1% of Cameroon's estimated superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 427 GW of energy capacity, far exceeding the country's 2021 electricity consumption of 7,937 GWh. While unlikely to meet 2030 climate goals, this technology could theoretically replace all coal and gas in the electricity sector, reducing emissions by approximately 2 megatonnes of CO2eq. The report emphasizes the technology's low land footprint (12 km² per 1 GW) and its potential to address energy poverty, as over 35% of Cameroon's population currently lacks electricity access.

The document highlights that just 1% of Canada's superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 490 GW of energy capacity, exceeding the country's projected 2050 electricity demand of 899,783 GWh. It argues that this technology offers a low-land-footprint alternative to other renewables and a transition pathway for oil and gas workers.

The document outlines the three-stage process of carbon capture and storage (CCS)—capture, transport, and storage—and argues that these technologies are essential for decarbonizing hard-to-abate industries like cement and natural gas processing. It highlights Colorado's significant geologic storage capacity, estimated at nearly 150 billion metric tons of CO2, and identifies the Denver Basin, Cañon City Embayment, Piceance, and Sand Wash basins as potentially suitable sites. Economically, the document cites Rhodium Group estimates that CCS deployment could create 1,060–1,580 operational jobs and nearly 400 transportation infrastructure jobs annually over 15 years. It also details financial incentives, including the federal 45Q tax credit (offering up to $180/ton for direct air capture) and state-level support via the Colorado Industrial Tax Credit Offering and the Clean Air Program (CAP). Finally, it addresses safety concerns, noting that EPA Class VI permits regulate storage to protect drinking water and that CO2 pipelines have a long safety record in the U.S.

The document outlines the three-stage process of CCS—capture, transport, and storage—and argues that these technologies are essential for decarbonizing Michigan's hard-to-abate industrial facilities. It highlights Michigan's significant geologic storage capacity, estimated at over 45 billion metric tons of CO2, and the role of the 45Q tax credit in incentivizing projects. The text notes that Michigan already has operational commercial CCS, such as the Core Energy, LLC project, and identifies 126 eligible power and industrial facilities for tax credits.

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 enhances the 45Q tax credit to make carbon capture and storage more accessible for hard-to-abate industries and direct air capture. Key changes include increased credit values, an extended construction window until 2033, the introduction of direct payment options, and lower capture thresholds for qualifying facilities.

The document outlines the three-stage process of carbon capture and storage (CCS)—capture, transport, and storage—and argues that the Midwest is uniquely positioned for deployment due to its industrial profile and geologic formations. It highlights the Illinois Basin, specifically the Mount Simon sandstone and Eau Claire formation, as a premier storage resource with an estimated capacity to store over 147 billion metric tons of CO2. The text notes that CCS can reduce harmful air pollutants and create between 8,050 and 11,880 operational jobs in Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and Ohio. Financial viability is driven by the 45Q tax credit, which offers up to $180/MT depending on the method of capture and storage. Safety and regulatory oversight are managed by the EPA's Underground Injection Control Program and PHMSA.

The Infrastructure Investments and Jobs Act (IIJA) allocates $12.1 billion toward carbon management, representing the largest single investment in the sector since 1997. The funding is distributed across four primary areas: carbon capture, utilization & storage (CCUS) research, development, and demonstration (RD&D); carbon transport and storage infrastructure and permitting; carbon utilization market development; and carbon removal priorities. Key allocations include $3.5 billion for four regional direct air capture (DAC) hubs and $2.5 billion for the CO2 Storage Commercialization Program. The document notes that IIJA provides the necessary RD&D and infrastructure, while the proposed Build Back Better Act (BBBA) was intended to provide the market incentives via 45Q tax credit enhancements.

The analysis finds a significant funding gap for European carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects that cannot recover costs through carbon pricing alone. By 2023, 55% of excess costs are uncovered, and a total shortfall of €10 billion is projected by 2030. While some countries like Norway, the UK, and the Netherlands have established specific incentive schemes, the report argues that additional targeted funding is required, particularly for high-cost sectors, to kickstart deployment and develop infrastructure.

The document argues that carbon capture and storage (CCS) is essential for the EU to achieve climate neutrality by 2050, particularly for harder-to-abate sectors like cement, steel, and chemicals. The signatories call for the Clean Industrial Deal to address critical gaps, including the lack of operational commercial-scale storage sites in the EU and the need for cross-border transport networks. Key recommendations include ensuring geographically balanced storage development to avoid leaving Central, Eastern, and Southern Europe behind, creating strong demand signals for decarbonised products through public procurement, and addressing funding gaps via the Competitiveness Fund and Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEI). The letter also emphasizes the need for international partnerships, specifically mentioning the removal of regulatory barriers to access storage in the UK and the Mediterranean Sea.

The document identifies cement manufacturing as responsible for 1.1% of total U.S. emissions, with 60% of those emissions stemming from the chemical process of calcination. It highlights three primary decarbonization pathways: feedstock substitutions and alternative production processes (including non-kiln pathways), clinker substitution using materials like slag or calcined clays, and Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS). To accelerate adoption, the document recommends low-interest loans, public procurement standards requiring Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs), state-funded pilot programs, and Contracts for Difference (CfDs).