Search Climate Insights Directory

The paper argues that Earth system interactions can be governed through comprehensive governance packages across different sub-systems and levels. It identifies three primary governance functions to manage these interactions: reducing system stress, risks, and vulnerabilities; navigating the transformation of economic activity; and developing a diversity of options. The analysis specifically considers the challenges of applying the planetary boundaries framework to the EU region to avoid shifting environmental problems from one sub-system to another.

The document details a workshop held at the Stockholm Resilience Centre involving approximately 35 participants. It examines social learning across four primary domains: natural resource management, climate change adaptation, social learning platforms, and the intersection of education and society. The proceedings highlight the definitional complexity of 'social learning', the influence of power dynamics, and the challenges of measuring learning outcomes in time-bound participatory projects. Key discussions emphasize the need for multi-level learning to build adaptive capacity in social-ecological systems and the role of 'shadow spaces' in facilitating international governance.

The document identifies a gap between the recognition of scientific knowledge and its practical application in Swedish climate adaptation. While County Administrative Boards coordinate regionally, local action is often hindered by a lack of political prioritization and a preference for short-term gains over long-term vulnerability management. Sector-specific analysis reveals that forestry lacks a formal adaptation strategy due to a focus on short-term productivity, and the water sector's investments are limited by a reliance on strict cost-benefit analyses and a lack of regulatory requirements.

This policy brief from the Climate and Development Knowledge Network argues that climate change adaptation in the Caribbean is fundamentally a governance challenge requiring a multi-level approach. It advocates for the creation of networks and hybrid partnerships between state and non-state actors to bridge jurisdictional scales and sectors, using case studies from St. Lucia and Jamaica to illustrate how community-based organizations and public-private partnerships can enhance adaptive capacity.

Climate Strategies proposes five operational avenues for the first 2025 JTWP dialogue, including a non-prescriptive governance framework, a case study repository, a resource database, justice-focused metrics, and a global governance architecture. For the second 2025 dialogue, it recommends addressing climate resilience, restorative justice, transition minerals, and deep dives into neglected sectors like food and health systems. The submission also suggests reforming the dialogue format to combine workshops with discussions to better facilitate the sharing of real-world practitioner experiences.

Climate Strategies argues that the upcoming Just Transition mechanism must overcome the current fragmentation of the UNFCCC architecture by integrating finance, technology, and stakeholder engagement. The submission recommends grounding the mechanism in real-world implementation evidence from the Global South, adopting multi-level and multi-sector governance, and ensuring that participation for marginalized groups translates into meaningful policy influence rather than mere procedural consultation.