Search Climate Insights Directory

The report analyzes the aftermath of the ANC's 54th national conference, where Cyril Ramaphosa narrowly defeated Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma. It argues that while Ramaphosa's victory averted a major crisis, the party remains deeply divided between 'reformists' and 'traditionalists,' placing South Africa in a 'muddling along' scenario. Key challenges include the potential recall of Jacob Zuma, avoiding a credit rating downgrade by Moody's, and managing the Tripartite Alliance. The author predicts the ANC will retain national power in 2019 but may lose its majority in Gauteng province, with the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) emerging as a potential kingmaker there.

Nigeria faces a severe deficit in basic physical infrastructure, particularly in sanitation, water, electricity, and roads, which hinders economic growth and human development. Benchmarked against lower middle-income peers, Nigeria lags significantly, and current trajectories suggest it will miss several Sustainable Development Goals by 2030. The report models several interventions, finding that increasing access to improved sanitation and clean water provides the highest returns for poverty reduction and health outcomes. However, achieving these targets requires overcoming significant challenges in government capacity, funding, and a heavy reliance on oil revenues.

The report argues that sub-Saharan Africa's inability to reduce poverty is rooted in rapid population growth and high demographic dependency ratios. While aid has provided modest positive impacts on growth and significant improvements in health and education indicators, it remains palliative unless it can sustain inclusive economic growth. The author presents three aid scenarios to 2030 (Current Path, More Aid, and Less Aid) and a fourth scenario focusing on reduced fertility. The analysis concludes that matching Ethiopia's fertility decline would have a significantly more positive impact on poverty rates by 2030 and 2040 than a substantial increase in aid.

The author examines the relationship between rising global military spending and international stability, arguing that the logic of deterrence often fails to eliminate threats like terrorism and can instead trigger security dilemmas. The text highlights a negative correlation between military spending and GDP growth, particularly in OECD countries, and suggests that diverting funds toward social policy could reduce radicalization. It proposes that the EU should prioritize integrated defense instruments, such as EU battlegroups, and strengthen arms control regulations to mitigate the risks of an inflationary arms race.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA in 2012 provide significant financial and environmental advantages to Arizona. By 2030, the average Arizona household is projected to be $2,800 richer due to gas savings. To date, Arizona has saved $680 million, and the standards have eliminated global warming emissions equivalent to twice those required to provide electricity to Tucson. Nationally, these standards are projected to increase GDP by up to $30 billion and create 650,000 full-time jobs by 2030.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA benefit Arkansas by reducing fuel costs, creating jobs, and lowering emissions. It projects that by 2030, the average Arkansas household will be $3,150 richer due to gas savings outweighing the upfront cost of more efficient vehicles. To date, Arkansas has saved $350 million, and the state is expected to see 5,000 new jobs. Environmentally, the standards eliminate global warming emissions in Arkansas nearly equivalent to those generated by providing electricity to Fayetteville.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA in 2012 provide significant financial and environmental gains for Colorado. By 2030, the average Colorado household is projected to be $2,700 richer due to gas savings. To date, Colorado has saved $550 million, and the standards have eliminated global warming emissions equivalent to three times those required to provide electricity to Boulder. Nationally, these standards are expected to increase GDP by up to $30 billion and create 650,000 full-time jobs by 2030.

The document argues that federal fuel economy and vehicle emissions standards set by the EPA and NHTSA provide significant financial and environmental benefits to Washington, DC, including household savings, job creation, and emissions reductions.

The document argues that federal fuel economy and emissions standards set by the EPA and NHTSA provide significant financial and environmental advantages to Georgia. By 2030, the average Georgia household is projected to be $2,700 richer due to gas savings. To date, the state has saved $970 million, and the standards have eliminated global warming emissions equivalent to four times those required to provide electricity to Savannah. The report further claims these standards support job creation and the stability of the American auto industry.

Federal fuel economy and vehicle emissions standards have saved Illinois $1.3 billion to date and are projected to make each household $2,200 richer by 2030. These standards are expected to create 27,200 new jobs in the state and eliminate global warming emissions equivalent to four times those from providing electricity to Springfield.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA provide significant financial and environmental advantages to Indiana. By 2030, the average Indiana household is projected to be $2,050 richer due to gas savings, and the state is expected to see 20,800 new jobs. To date, Indiana has saved $680 million. Environmentally, the standards eliminate global warming emissions equivalent to half of those produced by providing electricity to Indianapolis.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA in 2012 provide significant financial and environmental advantages to Kansas. By 2030, the average Kansas household is projected to be $2,750 richer due to gas savings, and the state is expected to see 5,900 new jobs. To date, Kansas has saved $330 million in fuel costs. Environmentally, the standards eliminate global warming emissions in Kansas equivalent to more than those generated by providing electricity to Topeka.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA provide significant financial and environmental advantages to Kentucky. It highlights that by 2030, the average Kentucky household will be $3,150 richer due to gas savings, and the state has already saved $540 million. Environmentally, the standards eliminate global warming emissions equivalent to half of those produced by providing electricity to Louisville. The report also links these standards to broader national economic growth, including an expected increase in GDP by up to $30 billion and the creation of 650,000 full-time jobs by 2030.

The document argues that federal fuel economy and global warming emissions standards set by the EPA and NHTSA provide significant financial and environmental benefits to Louisiana. It claims that by 2030, the average Louisiana household will be $3,200 richer due to gas savings outweighing the upfront cost of more efficient vehicles. To date, Louisiana has saved $530 million, and the state is expected to see 2,200 new jobs. Environmentally, the standards eliminate global warming emissions in Louisiana equivalent to half of those produced by providing electricity to New Orleans.

Federal fuel economy and vehicle emissions standards have saved Maine $190 million to date and are projected to make the average Maine household $2,950 richer by 2030. These standards reduce global warming emissions in Maine by an amount equivalent to twice those from providing electricity to Portland and are expected to create 2,900 new jobs in the state.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA in 2012 benefit Maryland by reducing gasoline consumption, lowering household spending at the pump, and stimulating local economic growth and job creation.

The document argues that federal fuel economy and global warming emissions standards set by the EPA and NHTSA benefit Michigan through significant household savings, job creation, and emissions reductions. It highlights that by 2030, the average Michigan household is expected to be $2,150 richer due to gas savings outweighing the upfront cost of more efficient vehicles. To date, Michigan has saved $1.1 billion, and the standards are projected to create 28,200 new jobs in the state. Environmentally, the standards eliminate global warming emissions in Michigan equivalent to twice those produced by providing electricity to Grand Rapids.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA in 2012 provide significant financial and environmental advantages to Minnesota. By 2030, the average Minnesota household is projected to be $2,850 richer due to gas savings. To date, the state has saved $650 million, and the standards are expected to support 12,800 new jobs in the state. Environmentally, the standards eliminate global warming emissions in Minnesota equivalent to three times those produced by providing electricity to Duluth.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA in 2012 provide significant benefits to Mississippi, including fuel savings, job creation, and emissions reductions. It projects that by 2030, the average Mississippi household will be $3,150 richer due to gas savings outweighing the upfront cost of more efficient vehicles. To date, Mississippi has saved $350 million, and the state is expected to see 4,700 new jobs. Environmentally, the standards eliminate global warming emissions in Mississippi equivalent to twice those produced by providing electricity to Jackson.

The document argues that federal fuel economy and global warming emissions standards provide significant financial and environmental advantages to Missouri. It highlights that the state has already saved $690 million and projects that the average Missouri household will be $2,600 richer by 2030 due to gas savings. Additionally, the standards are expected to create 13,500 new jobs in the state and eliminate emissions equivalent to more than those required to provide electricity to Springfield.