Search Climate Insights Directory

The document outlines a four-phase framework for sustainable finance taxonomies: governance, design, implementation, and expansion/revision. It emphasizes 'interoperability' to facilitate cross-border financial flows, recommending a science-based approach aligned with the Paris Agreement. Key design elements include the definition of environmental and social objectives, sector selection based on the International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC), and the use of Technical Screening Criteria (TSC). The guide details how to handle transition activities through binary or 'traffic-light' archetypes and provides a step-by-step alignment process for activities, entities, and portfolios. It also addresses the specific needs of SMEs and the necessity of periodic reviews every three to five years to maintain scientific and technological relevance.

The document outlines a four-phase framework for sustainable finance taxonomies: governance, design, implementation, and expansion/revision. It emphasizes 'interoperability'—the ability of different taxonomies to share common principles and scientific bases, such as the Paris Agreement, to facilitate cross-border financial flows. The guide details the creation of technical selection criteria (TSC), the integration of transition activities using 'binary' or 'traffic-light' approaches, and the application of 'Do No Significant Harm' (DNSH) and Minimum Social Safeguards (MSS) principles. It also provides a step-by-step alignment guide for activities, entities, and portfolios, while offering strategies to make taxonomies accessible to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

The document outlines a comprehensive framework for creating and managing sustainable finance taxonomies, structured around four phases: governance, design, implementation, and expansion/revision. It emphasizes the use of the International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC) for sector structures to ensure cross-border comparability and recommends 'pass/fail' technical screening criteria aligned with science-based pathways. The guide details a 'traffic light' approach for transition activities, including 'green', 'transition/amber', and 'excluded' categories, and provides a three-level aggregation methodology (Activity, Entity, Portfolio) for assessing taxonomy alignment. It also addresses the specific needs of SMEs through simplified compliance and the use of grandfathering clauses to provide investment certainty during criteria updates.

The briefing outlines a strategy to redirect global private savings toward 1.5°C compatible infrastructure, particularly in developing countries which represent 70% of investment needs. It proposes a coordinated approach to de-risk investments through public guarantees, the recognition of climate remediation assets as collateral by Central Banks, and the use of AAA multi-sovereign guarantees to encourage cross-border capital flows. The document emphasizes the need to reduce debt burdens in developing countries and integrate recovery policies with climate objectives and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) ahead of the 2023 Global Stocktake.

The briefing outlines a pathway for Nigeria to reach net-zero emissions by 2060, emphasizing the need to move away from oil dependency through Public-Private Community Partnerships (PPCP). It identifies critical opportunities in waste management, clean energy access, and the AFOLU sector, while proposing the use of debt-for-climate swaps to fund the USD 410 billion Energy Transition Plan. The authors argue that systemic transformation requires engaging key government stakeholders, such as the Office of the Vice-President, and supporting local cleantech entrepreneurship to create green jobs.

Ghana faces a significant climate finance gap, with an annual average of USD 830 million tracked in 2019 and 2020, representing only 5-9% of its estimated needs of USD 9.3-15.5 billion. Public finance dominates at 87% of total flows, while private finance accounts for only 13%, heavily concentrated in energy systems. Funding is split nearly equally between adaptation (49%) and mitigation (47%), with the agriculture, forestry, and land use (AFOLU) and energy sectors receiving the most investment. The brief recommends implementing a national climate finance taxonomy, deploying innovative instruments like green bonds and blended finance, and improving the granularity of tracking to attract more private capital.

The document defines green bonds as fixed-income instruments where proceeds are earmarked for sustainable projects. It details how these bonds can lower borrowing costs through a 'greenium' (typically 25 bps) and diversify investor bases. The guide outlines the internal and regulatory capacities needed for issuance, including the development of Green Bond Frameworks and the use of taxonomies. It categorizes market readiness into shallow, emerging, and mature markets, providing specific pathways for each. Key challenges identified include high transaction costs for small issuances, limited project pipelines for adaptation, and greenwashing risks due to a lack of liability mechanisms. The document also highlights the role of Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) and Development Finance Institutions (DFIs) in providing technical assistance and credit enhancements.

The document provides a comprehensive overview of securitization as a tool for climate finance, detailing how pooling fragmented green assets into tradable securities can increase liquidity and recycle capital for originators. It outlines the roles of key stakeholders, provides a framework for assessing financial market readiness (shallow, emerging, and mature), and offers practical pathways for ministries of finance and regulators to implement these instruments. The guide also highlights specific examples of green asset-backed securities in Australia, Kenya, and West Africa, while addressing challenges such as data gaps and high transaction costs.

This guide outlines strategies for legal professionals to drive corporate climate action. It focuses on four key areas: enhancing corporate governance by tying executive pay to climate targets and diversifying boards; managing external counsel to ensure alignment with decarbonization; incorporating climate risk and emissions data into legal contracts and financial instruments; and navigating evolving environmental regulations.

The guide outlines capital sources for municipal on-bill financing, including internal utility reserves, public funding, private lending, and bond issuance. It details risk management tools such as Loan Loss Reserves, loan guarantees, and subordinated capital to reduce borrowing costs and protect lenders from borrower defaults.

The document argues that the financialization of nature allows companies to bypass strict environmental regulations through biodiversity offsets and carbon credits. It details the emergence of a 'conservation industry' comprising specialized NGOs, think tanks, and financial institutions that create the standards and accounting methods necessary for this system. The report highlights how extractive industries, aviation, and agribusiness use these mechanisms to access protected areas and 'greenwash' their activities, while noting that actual private investment in conservation remains a small fraction of global financial flows.

The report argues that the financialization of nature—transforming ecological functions into tradable units—serves corporate interests by facilitating greenwashing, easing regulatory compliance, and opening protected areas to extractive industries. It details the emergence of a new conservation industry comprising specialized NGOs, think tanks, and financial instruments like green bonds. The document contends that while these mechanisms are presented as solutions to the biodiversity crisis, they often act as a "mirage" of private investment, primarily benefiting corporations through improved credit ratings and a "social license to operate" while continuing environmental destruction.

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is a global infrastructure and economic cooperation framework led by China, focusing on energy and transport connectivity across Asia, Europe, and Africa. While marketed as a 'win-win' development strategy, the document argues it often serves Chinese domestic interests, such as exporting industrial overcapacity and asserting geopolitical influence. The briefing highlights significant environmental risks, particularly the funding of coal-fired power plants and large hydropower projects, and a lack of transparent environmental, social, and governance (ESG) safeguards. It identifies a 'debt trap' risk for recipient countries and calls for a shift toward a 'Green BRI' aligned with international sustainability standards.

The document analyzes the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) as a strategic tool for China to export industrial overcapacity and expand global influence. It highlights a systemic lack of transparency, the dominance of state-owned enterprises, and significant environmental risks, particularly through the financing of coal and hydropower projects. While China promotes a 'Green BRI' and 'ecological civilization,' the report argues that actual implementation often lacks rigorous safeguards, leading to 'debt traps' and biodiversity loss. It calls for international civil society to push for binding treaties on multinationals and the adoption of higher environmental and social standards.

The report argues that the 'financialization of nature'—the process of turning ecological functions into tradeable monetary units—primarily serves corporate interests rather than conservation. It details how companies in extractive industries, aviation, and construction use biodiversity offsets to bypass environmental regulations and greenwash destructive activities. The document also highlights the emergence of a 'new conservation industry' comprising NGOs, think tanks, and financial institutions that promote these market-based approaches. Finally, it contends that private sector investment in conservation is significantly over-hyped, serving as a facade to secure public subsidies and avoid stringent environmental laws.

FSD Africa's 2025-2030 strategy aims to transform the continent's financial system to better support sustainable growth and climate resilience. The agency intends to mobilise domestic private capital—estimated at $2.4 trillion—to address gaps in energy transition, climate adaptation, and SME financing. Key implementation plans include the creation of four Centres of Expertise and a Catalytic Transactions Team to build a pipeline of bankable green projects. The strategy sets specific targets, including adding 1,500 megawatts of energy capacity and creating or protecting 200,000 jobs.

The Africa Green Bond Toolkit, developed by FSD Africa and the Climate Bonds Initiative, serves as a practical manual for entities in Africa to issue green bonds. It outlines the structural differences between green and vanilla bonds, detailing how proceeds must be exclusively allocated to projects with environmental benefits. The document guides issuers through the pre-issuance phase—including the creation of a Green Bond Framework and independent verification—and the post-issuance phase, focusing on reporting and auditing. It highlights global benchmarks such as the Green Bond Principles (GBP) and the Climate Bonds Standard (CBS), while providing African case studies from South Africa, Kenya, and Nigeria to demonstrate investor demand and the role of credit guarantees in market development.

FSD Africa's Climate Finance Training Programme aims to close the green funding gap in Africa by training policymakers, regulators, and financial professionals. The program focuses on building the skills necessary to access the Green Climate Fund (GCF) and other climate funds, specifically through the accreditation of direct access entities (DAEs). To date, the training has reached 70 officials and 31 students from 13 institutions across 11 countries. The program expects to drive a sixteen-fold increase in investments in sub-Saharan Africa, with a projected funding split of 40% from climate funds and 60% from private sector financing tools. In Ethiopia, the training targeted staff from the Ministry of Finance, the National Bank of Ethiopia, and the Ethiopia Roads Authority to foster policy change and the potential issuance of green bonds.

The Nigerian Green Bond Market Development Programme aims to broaden investment in green projects to alleviate a severe energy crisis where 86 million people lack electricity. The programme supports sovereign and corporate issuances, including a demonstration green bond and a specific NGN 3 billion bond for OneWattSolar to deploy 750 off-grid solar systems. Nigeria's enhanced Nationally Determined Contributions target a 20% emission reduction, with a further 47% conditional on securing an estimated USD 177 billion in investment.

The 'Kit d’Outils d’Obligations Verte Afrique' is a practical guide developed by FSD Africa and the Climate Bonds Initiative (CBI) to support the issuance of green bonds in Africa. It outlines the structural similarities between green and conventional bonds, while detailing the specific requirements for environmental benefit allocation, transparency, and reporting. The document explains global benchmarks such as the Green Bond Principles (GBP) and the Climate Bonds Standard (CBS), and provides a step-by-step issuance process including pre-emission preparation and post-emission verification. It also highlights successful case studies from South Africa, Kenya, and Nigeria to demonstrate investor demand and the role of credit guarantees in local market mobilization.