Search Climate Insights Directory

The document outlines key messages from a 2012 expert meeting on REDD+, emphasizing that safeguard information systems (SIS) can leverage existing national and international reporting architectures to reduce costs. It argues that private sector involvement is essential for bridging financing gaps and providing technical expertise, but requires policy certainty, particularly regarding carbon credit ownership and trading rights. The briefing suggests a 'nested approach' for resource mobilization and calls for further capacity building in MRV and benefit-sharing systems.

The document details an expert meeting held in April 2012 to address two critical determinants of REDD+ success: the development of Safeguard Information Systems (SIS) and the fostering of effective private sector engagement. It highlights the need for flexible, country-driven SIS that leverage existing national and international architectures to keep transaction costs low. Regarding the private sector, the report emphasizes that policy clarity, certainty on carbon rights, and a 'nested approach' to accounting are essential to attract investment. The report also identifies significant capacity gaps in MRV, safeguards, and benefit-sharing systems across national and local levels.

The document outlines findings from an expert meeting on REDD+, emphasizing that safeguard information systems (SIS) can be built upon existing national and international architectures rather than requiring new methodologies. It highlights that private sector participation is essential for closing financial gaps and providing technical expertise, provided there is policy clarity, particularly regarding carbon credit ownership. The briefing also suggests the 'nested approach' as a promising policy option for resource mobilization and calls for continued capacity building in MRV and benefit-sharing systems.

The letter argues that CDM coal power projects are non-additional, generate artificial carbon credits, and lock in billions of tons of CO2 while causing health and ecosystem damage. It references a CDM Executive Board suspension and an independent SEI study to support the claim that revised methodologies cannot ensure real and measurable emission reductions, calling for a formal CMP decision at COP-17 to exclude these projects.

The report critiques the Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership (KFCP), a pilot REDD project funded by the Australian government. It argues that the project fails to protect indigenous rights, ignores the root causes of deforestation, and risks creating 'leakage' where emissions are simply displaced. The document highlights conflicts over land tenure among the Dayak people and criticizes the use of market-based carbon offsets as a way for developed nations like Australia to avoid reducing their own fossil fuel emissions.

The Sierra Club CDM Watch requests that the CDM Executive Board reject the registration of the Guangdong Pinghai Power Plant in China. The authors argue the project is non-additional because it was operational before validation, ultra-supercritical coal technology is already common practice in China, and the project's financial analysis is flawed, failing to consider alternative tariff structures or realistic coal price fluctuations.

The document asserts that coal projects in the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) are non-additional, conflict with sustainability goals by harming local ecosystems, and lock in long-term CO2 emissions. It further claims that flawed CDM rules lead to significant over-crediting of these projects, which are often used merely as an additional revenue stream for planned investments.

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) advocates against the Keystone XL pipeline, citing the high greenhouse gas emissions of Alberta's tar sands and concerns over political influence in the State Department's permitting process. The statement also details CIEL's efforts to eliminate coal funding in international finance institutions, specifically criticizing World Bank loans for coal projects in South Africa and Kosovo, while referencing IPCC findings that renewables could meet nearly 80 percent of global energy supply by mid-century.

The document examines South Africa's industrial development zones (IDZs), established in 2000, and argues that current incentives are insufficient to attract necessary foreign investment. By comparing South African IDZs with special trade zones in the EU, US, Mercosur, India, and China, the author identifies gaps in regulatory, financial, and fiscal incentives. The paper recommends that the South African government introduce specific IDZ incentives, such as easing labour-market requirements and providing infrastructure and wage subsidies, while expanding the scope of these zones to include trade-related service industries.

NGOs express concern over a European Commission draft proposal that would treat all information in the EU ETS Union Registry, including account holdings and serial numbers, as confidential. The briefing argues that removing serial numbers would eliminate the traceability necessary to enforce the ban on industrial gas (HFC and N2O) carbon credits and verify the eligibility of Kyoto units based on issuance dates. The authors urge EU Member States to maintain open access to installation and account data to ensure market accountability and the effective implementation of the scheme.

The report documents the negative impacts of Holcim's cement and mining activities in Latin America, focusing on the destruction of aquifers and landscapes, air pollution, and health crises. It highlights the use of 'co-processing' to incinerate hazardous waste and criticizes the role of Free Trade Agreements and international arbitration (CIADI) in protecting corporate interests over community rights. Specific cases include the criminalization of Maya Kaqchikel communities in Guatemala, the degradation of the Tunjuelo River in Bogotá, and neurotoxic acrylates emissions in Mexico. The document concludes by detailing a 2010 complaint filed against Holcim at the Permanent Peoples' Tribunal in Madrid.

CDM Watch argues that HFC-23 and N2O abatement projects under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) create perverse incentives and fail to represent real emission reductions. The organization calls on EU Member States to support a European Commission draft Regulation that bans the use of these credits in the EU ETS from 1 January 2013 and prohibits their banking into Phase 3 to maintain environmental integrity over private investor interests.

The report details a 2011 workshop in Sierra Leone focused on applying conflict-sensitive conservation (CSC) to the Gola Rainforest National Park. Participants identified various conflicts, including wildlife-human clashes, resource access disputes, and unequal benefit-sharing. The workshop prioritized these issues based on human and conservation impacts, selecting four key conflicts for detailed analysis using conflict trees and maps to develop potential solutions.

An open letter from civil society organizations to the COP 16 Presidency calling for the suspension of carbon credits for HFC-23 projects due to methodology flaws that lead to over-issuance. The authors urge the UNFCCC to rescind credits issued since November 26, 2010, and suggest transitioning HFC-23 management to the Montreal Protocol to ensure real emission reductions.

A coalition of NGOs argues that HFC-23 projects, which account for half of all CDM carbon credits, are based on a flawed methodology leading to the over-issuance of credits that do not represent real emission reductions. The letter criticizes the CDM Executive Board for resuming credit issuance despite these findings and calls for the rescission of credits issued since 26 November 2010, a total halt on further issuance until methodology is corrected, and the adoption of HFC phase-down measures under the Montreal Protocol.

Carbon Market Watch reports that over 800,000 Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) were issued to an HFC-23 abatement project in India on 12 November 2010, despite a suspension of HFC-23 credit issuance enacted by the Executive Board in August 2010. The organization suggests the issuance may have been an error and urges the Board to recall the credits and review the project. Additionally, CDM Watch advises potential buyers from Germany, the UK, Italy, the Netherlands, France, and Switzerland to refrain from using these credits for compliance.

Civil society organizations, including CDM Watch and EIA, sent open letters to various financial institutions and energy companies to express concerns over HFC-23 projects under the CDM. The letters argue that these projects lack environmental integrity, reward inefficient production, and create perverse incentives for the production of HCFC-22. The signatories call for changes to CDM methodology and the exclusion of these credits from the EU ETS.

The paper examines the carbon trading landscape, focusing on the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and the potential for South Africa to establish a local carbon market. It highlights that while South Africa is the only African country among the top 20 CDM host countries, it remains underrepresented in carbon credit generation due to financing and technical hurdles. The authors argue that a shift from coal dependence to renewable energy is necessary to meet domestic and international targets, and that policy certainty is required to attract further investment.

The document argues that the World Bank is defending HFC-23 incineration projects in China that manipulate production to maximize the generation of 'fake' carbon credits. It highlights evidence that manufacturers increase HFC-23 waste production specifically to earn Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) and criticizes the World Bank for ignoring findings from the CDM Methodologies Panel and the Montreal Protocol's TEAP. It notes that the UN CDM Executive Board has launched investigations into six such projects, including the delay of over 3 million CERs for the Changshu Zonghao project.

The report analyzes Chile's transition toward non-conventional renewable energy (NCRE), noting that while installed capacity in the Central Interconnected Grid (SIC) nearly doubled between 2007 and 2009, the sector remains hindered by high market concentration and financial risks. It details the impact of Law No. 20.257, which mandates a clean energy quota of 5% by 2010 and 10% by 2024, and evaluates CORFO's incentive programs. The document highlights a critical tension between the growth of clean energy and a simultaneous increase in coal-fired generation, which threatens Chile's climate goals and long-term competitiveness.