Search Climate Insights Directory

The authors argue for an integrated approach to resilience that bridges the gap between psychosocial traditions (focused on the family) and social-ecological approaches (focused on macro-systems). Using a combination of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale and narrative inquiry in the Sundarbans region of Bangladesh after the 2009 Cyclone Aila, the study finds that human resilience is a holistic and dynamic process driven by complex interactions between gender, education, livelihood, and social-ecological contexts.

The research examines the interaction effects of business-development partnerships in the Global South, arguing that the current global model often prioritizes corporate interests and high-level rhetoric over grounded social impact. Through narrative inquiry and case studies in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Myanmar, and Dubai, the author illustrates how corporate operations can inadvertently fund conflict, confer legitimacy to violent actors, and facilitate the laundering of conflict minerals, despite public commitments to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The paper concludes that non-binding, self-reported frameworks like the UN Global Compact are insufficient and that binding, independently verified regulatory initiatives are necessary to ensure peace-positive business action.