Search Climate Insights Directory

Search syntax
intitle:
The document title intitle:"climate education"
ispublisher:
The publishing organization ispublisher:CAPE
insummary:
Summary and key findings insummary:"conflict of interest"
hasconcept:
Climate tags, frame/perspective and analysis type hasconcept:"Climate Justice"
geography:
Regions the document covers or discusses geography:Canada
doctype:
Document type doctype:report
lang:
Document language, as an ISO code lang:fr
cidid:
One record, by its directory id cidid:iisd-000297
Analysis TypeMedia analysis
Clear all

23 results

  • The report analyzes 2013 cable news segments from CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC, finding significant disparities in scientific accuracy. MSNBC had the highest accuracy rate (92%), followed by CNN (70%) and Fox News (28%). The authors argue that misleading coverage, particularly the use of 'false debates' on CNN and the disparagement of scientists on Fox News, hinders democratic dialogue on climate policy by conflating established scientific facts with political opinions.

    AI-generated

    This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

    Document type: Report

    Regions: United States
  • A 2012 analysis by the Union of Concerned Scientists found that climate science coverage in Fox News Channel and the Wall Street Journal's opinion pages was overwhelmingly misleading, frequently dismissing scientific consensus and denigrating scientists. The report recommends that News Corporation develop standards for accurate communication and distinguish between scientific evidence and policy debates.

    AI-generated

    This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

    Document type: Fact sheet

    Regions: United States
  • The document analyzes how Norway responded to the July 22 terror attacks through a lens of 'negotiating values.' It explores the tension between a temporary 'consensus sphere' of national unity and the underlying complexities of a diverse, pluralistic society. Key analyses include the role of media in shaping narratives, the psychological mechanisms of resilience, the philosophical foundations of human dignity and free speech, and the impact of digital algorithms on crisis discourse.

    AI-generated

    This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

    Document type: Research paper

    Regions: Norway
Showing 21–23 of 23 documents