Search Climate Insights Directory

The report finds that international reporting of military greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is generally poor, with significant under-reporting in data submitted to the UNFCCC. A comparison of five top military spenders showed that defence ministry reports for direct emissions were, on average, 95% higher than UNFCCC figures. The report highlights a critical lack of Scope 3 (supply-chain) reporting, noting that less than 10% of military carbon footprints typically appear in UNFCCC data. It identifies systemic loopholes in reporting guidelines and instances of 'greenwashing,' specifically by the UK military, and recommends mandatory, explicit military emissions reporting within National Inventory Reports.

The document argues that high-quality, open power sector data is essential for the coal-to-clean electricity transition in Asia, a region containing 80% of global coal generation. It details a research methodology used to evaluate data transparency in 39 economies across East, Southeast, South, Central, and West Asia, as well as Oceania, by assessing 74 data sources against criteria such as time and geographical granularity, publishing lag, and ease of access.

The report documents a cumulative environmental burden in North Denver and Commerce City, where industrial zoning and high-volume transportation infrastructure lead to significant pollution and health risks. Key findings include widespread EPA violations among local facilities, high levels of PM2.5 emissions from diesel traffic near schools, and systemic data gaps regarding freight rail and business impacts. The authors argue that while North Denver provides essential energy, goods, and waste services for the broader Denver Metro area, the local community bears the health costs, including higher rates of asthma and cancer risks.

The paper finds major discrepancies between military GHG emissions data published by the Ministry of Defence (MOD) and the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS). It concludes that 'headline' figures understate scope 1 and 2 emissions by 36% to 71% and that lifecycle emissions and war-fighting impacts are entirely omitted from official statistics.

The report examines the potential impact of reforming LPG subsidies in Indonesia, noting that women in poor and near-poor households are more vulnerable to price increases. It identifies three primary economic risks for poor women: eroded household budgets, increased time spent on fuel collection or cooking, and higher input costs for small businesses. The study also evaluates alternatives for cleaner cooking, concluding that induction stoves are the most viable option for Indonesia's transition away from fossil fuels.

This report examines the intersection of gender and LPG subsidy reform in Indonesia, finding that current subsidies are regressive and fail to reach many poor women. It highlights that women are more vulnerable to price increases due to their primary role in cooking and household management, and that switching back to biomass fuels poses significant health risks through indoor air pollution.

In 2011, Sida and the Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) performed a desktop review of a sample of projects to assess how accurately Sida's financial data was classified according to OECD DAC policy markers. The analysis focused on markers for climate change adaptation, climate change mitigation, biodiversity and ecosystem services, and the environment to ensure robust reporting and internal consistency in development cooperation assistance.