Search Climate Insights Directory

The report assesses a simulated agroforestry project in Welkenraedt, Belgium, covering approximately 100,000 m2 of hedges and trees. Using the SAVi tool and C3S climate data, the analysis demonstrates that the project is financially viable when environmental and social externalities are included. Key findings include estimated net benefits of 3.9 million euros over 20 years against an investment of 607,629 euros. The study highlights how agroforestry mitigates climate risks, such as reducing heat stress for livestock and preventing soil erosion and nutrient runoff, with benefits expected to increase under RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 climate scenarios.

The document details how climate indicators from the Copernicus Climate Data Store (CDS)—including precipitation, temperature, and evaporation—are integrated into the SAVi Irrigation model. It provides a literature review on the impacts of temperature and precipitation on crop yields and water requirements, establishes the methodology for calculating net and total irrigation requirements, and presents simulation results for Johannesburg under the IPSL RCP8.5 scenario, projecting a 23% increase in net irrigation requirements by 2090-2100.

The report evaluates the financial value of nature-based infrastructure in Manitoba, Canada, specifically Pelly's Lake (a natural wetland) and Stephenfield Reservoir (a naturalized built reservoir). Using the SAVi methodology, it calculates the value of services such as irrigation, water storage, nutrient removal, and carbon sequestration. The analysis finds that both assets are significantly more cost-effective than equivalent grey infrastructure. For Stephenfield Reservoir, the cumulative discounted value of enabled economic activity is CAD 6.07 billion by 2050, while replacing its services with grey infrastructure would cost CAD 5.33 million in capital. For Pelly's Lake, ecosystem services are valued at approximately CAD 60 million, whereas equivalent grey infrastructure would cost CAD 36.99 million. The report argues that maintaining these natural assets optimizes value for money and supports climate adaptation against floods and droughts.