Browse all documents

The Mo Ibrahim Prize and its Implications for Africa`s Leadership and Democracy

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This briefing discusses the implications of the Mo Ibrahim Foundation's decision not to award the Mo Ibrahim Prize for good governance in Africa for a specific year, examining the prize's criteria and its role in promoting democratisation on the continent.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The Mo Ibrahim Prize, established in 2006 by businessman Dr Mo Ibrahim, is an annual award for African leaders who meet four specific criteria: they must be a democratically elected Head of State or Government, have served within constitutional limits, left office at the end of those limits, and done so within the last three years.
  • The prize package is described as the largest annual individual award globally, providing US$5 million over ten years and an additional US$200,000 annually for life.
  • The Prize Committee, which includes figures such as former UN Secretary General Kofi Anan and former OAU Secretary General Salim Ahmed Salim, considers a candidate's achievements in development, security, peace, and the promotion of democratic processes.
  • The decision by the committee to not select a winner for the year was unexpected, especially given that several leaders had left office between 2006 and 2008, including Mathieu Kerekou in Benin, Ahmad Tejan Kabbah in Sierra Leone, Olusegun Obasanjo in Nigeria, Thabo Mbeki in South Africa, and John Kufuor in Ghana.
  • The author suggests that the non-attribution of the prize may signal a 'receding democracy' on the continent, noting unconstitutional government changes in Mauritania, Madagascar, and Guinea, though they argue that Africa has still made significant progress compared to the Cold War era.

Cite the original document

APA
Sarki, H. (n.d.). The Mo Ibrahim Prize and its Implications for Africa`s Leadership and Democracy. Institute for Security Studies. https://issafrica.org/iss-today/the-mo-ibrahim-prize-and-its-implications-for-africas-leadership-and-democracy
Chicago
Sarki, Halif. The Mo Ibrahim Prize and its Implications for Africa`s Leadership and Democracy. Institute for Security Studies, n.d. https://issafrica.org/iss-today/the-mo-ibrahim-prize-and-its-implications-for-africas-leadership-and-democracy.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Sarki |first1=Halif |title=The Mo Ibrahim Prize and its Implications for Africa`s Leadership and Democracy |publisher=Institute for Security Studies |url=https://issafrica.org/iss-today/the-mo-ibrahim-prize-and-its-implications-for-africas-leadership-and-democracy |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{sarkindibrahim, author = {Sarki, Halif}, title = {{The Mo Ibrahim Prize and its Implications for Africa`s Leadership and Democracy}}, institution = {Institute for Security Studies}, url = {https://issafrica.org/iss-today/the-mo-ibrahim-prize-and-its-implications-for-africas-leadership-and-democracy}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated