Первоначальные инвестиционные рамки: субкритерии и индикативные факторы оценки для конкретных мероприятий

The document outlines a detailed framework for Accredited Entities to develop funding proposals for the Green Climate Fund. It specifies the sub-criteria and indicative assessment factors across six main investment criteria: Impact Potential, Paradigm Shift Potential, Sustainable Development Potential, Recipient Needs, National Ownership, and Efficiency and Effectiveness. These factors include quantitative metrics, such as tonnes of CO2 equivalent reduced and the number of beneficiaries, as well as qualitative assessments regarding innovation, gender equality, and institutional capacity.

• Funding proposals must satisfy all six primary investment criteria, although only the sub-criteria and indicative factors relevant to the specific activity need to be addressed.
• Impact potential for mitigation is measured by the expected volume of CO2 equivalent emissions reduced or avoided, the avoidance of long-lived high-emission infrastructure, and the increase in low-emission energy capacity (MW) and household access.
• Adaptation impact is assessed through the number of direct and indirect beneficiaries, the reduction of vulnerability for the most marginalized groups using a gender-responsive approach, and the strengthening of climate-informed institutional systems.
• The 'Paradigm Shift Potential' criterion evaluates a project's ability to scale and replicate its impact beyond the initial investment, focusing on innovation in technologies or business models and the creation of new markets.
• Sustainable development potential includes assessing co-benefits across environmental (air and soil quality, biodiversity), social (health, education, culture), and economic (job creation, poverty reduction, private sector investment) dimensions.
• Recipient needs are evaluated based on the country's vulnerability to climate risks, the socio-economic development level of the target population (including minorities and indigenous peoples), and the lack of alternative funding sources.
• National ownership requires that projects align with national climate strategies, such as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) or National Adaptation Plans (NAPs), and involve consultations with civil society.
• Efficiency and effectiveness are measured by financial viability, the cost per tonne of CO2 equivalent for mitigation projects, and the co-financing ratio of private and public funds relative to GCF investment.

APA

Green Climate Fund (n.d.). Первоначальные инвестиционные рамки: субкритерии и индикативные факторы оценки для конкретных мероприятий. https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/document/ru-investment-framework-criteria-assessment.pdf

Chicago

Green Climate Fund. Первоначальные инвестиционные рамки: субкритерии и индикативные факторы оценки для конкретных мероприятий. n.d. https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/document/ru-investment-framework-criteria-assessment.pdf.

Wikipedia

{{cite report |author=Green Climate Fund |title=Первоначальные инвестиционные рамки: субкритерии и индикативные факторы оценки для конкретных мероприятий |url=https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/document/ru-investment-framework-criteria-assessment.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}

BibTeX

@techreport{greenclimatefundnd, author = {{Green Climate Fund}}, title = {{Первоначальные инвестиционные рамки: субкритерии и индикативные факторы оценки для конкретных мероприятий}}, institution = {Green Climate Fund}, url = {https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/document/ru-investment-framework-criteria-assessment.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }