Search Climate Insights Directory

Plan 1.5 criticizes the Climate Change Center for continuing a cookstove project in Myanmar after the 2021 military coup, arguing that the project provides administrative legitimacy to the junta and relies on fraudulent emission reductions. The statement highlights that the project operates in conflict-heavy regions like Sagaing and Magway, where monitoring is deemed unreliable, and claims that previous emission reductions were inflated by approximately 14.4 times.

The statement calls for the South Korean National Assembly to urgently amend the Framework Act on Carbon Neutrality following a Constitutional Court ruling that the existing law violates the environmental rights of future generations. It criticizes the government and the People Power Party for delaying the process despite public support for stronger targets and warns that such delays exacerbate vulnerabilities for women, workers, farmers, and the urban poor.

A coalition of environmental organizations demands that the South Korean government stop the expansion of LNG power generation in the upcoming 12th Basic Plan for Electricity Supply and Demand, citing price volatility, carbon lock-in risks, and the economic viability of renewable energy alternatives.

A statement by Plan 1.5 calling on the South Korean National Assembly to establish a more ambitious long-term greenhouse gas reduction path, specifically starting from a 61% reduction target by 2035, following a public deliberation process where a majority of citizen representatives supported early and higher-than-average emissions cuts.

Plan 1.5 argues that the South Korean government's 2035 NDC, set at 53-61% below 2018 levels, is inadequate because the 'practical' lower bound of 53% is driven by industrial interests rather than scientific necessity. The organization highlights that the industrial sector's reduction target of 24.3% is significantly lower than those of comparable manufacturing nations like Japan and Germany. The statement calls on the National Assembly to revise long-term reduction paths to protect future generations and avoid potential legal liabilities under international law.

Plan 1.5 criticizes the South Korean government's proposed 2035 NDC targets of 50-60% and 53-60% reductions compared to 2018 levels, labeling them unconstitutional. The organization argues these targets lack scientific basis, ignore the country's fair share of global emissions reductions (estimated at 65%), and unfairly shift the burden of climate action to future generations by prioritizing short-term industrial interests.

Plan 1.5 argues that the South Korean government's current 2035 NDC consultation process is biased toward industrial interests and excludes marginalized groups. The organization highlights that approximately 95% of online public submissions demand a 65% reduction target aligned with the 1.5°C goal, while criticizing the 50% range as unconstitutional and insufficient.

The document refutes claims by the Korea Automotive Mobility Industry Association (KAIA) that the South Korean government's 2035 NDC targets for zero-emission vehicles are unrealistic. While KAIA argues that the EU and California are relaxing bans on internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, the text asserts that EU targets remain firm and California's situation is a matter of ongoing legal dispute. It further argues that strong regulations and government support in China and the US (specifically for Tesla) demonstrate that ambitious climate targets foster innovation and competitiveness rather than hindering it.