Search Climate Insights Directory

The document serves as an information guide for citizens, lawyers, and NGOs on how to challenge environmental decisions and actions in Poland. It details the three pillars of the Aarhus Convention—access to information, public participation, and access to justice—and explains how these are implemented through Polish law and EU directives. It outlines specific procedures for appealing decisions on environmental information, challenging permits requiring public participation, and seeking liability for environmental damage through administrative, civil, and criminal courts. Additionally, it describes external legal avenues, including the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee, and the European Court of Human Rights.

The document outlines the legal mechanisms available to the public and NGOs to ensure environmental law enforcement in France. It details the three pillars of the Aarhus Convention—access to information, public participation, and access to justice—and explains how these are transposed into EU directives (EIA, IED, ELD). The guide provides practical instructions on French national procedures, such as appeals to the CADA and administrative courts, while highlighting systemic barriers like prohibitive costs and long judicial delays. It also covers supra-national recourse options via the CJEU, the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee, and the European Court of Human Rights.

The Clean Air Parents’ Network, supported by ClientEarth and the British Lung Foundation, issued this toolkit for the 2019 UK General Election. It urges voters to pressure candidates to adopt a pledge focusing on protecting children's health, implementing Clean Air Zones, and meeting World Health Organization particulate matter guidelines by 2030. The document provides factual talking points on the public health crisis caused by road transport emissions and offers practical tools for campaigning, including email templates, social media strategies, and questions for hustings.

The 2019 Climate Snapshot reveals that a majority of UK adults view climate change as a critical issue and believe the government is not doing enough to prepare for its impacts. There is significant public support for radical policy shifts, including bringing forward the 2050 net zero deadline, implementing a 'Green New Deal', and holding financial institutions legally accountable for fossil fuel investments. The survey also highlights a preference for solar and offshore wind energy and a desire for faster adoption of low-emission vehicles.

The report details unprecedented commercial logging in 2017, the failure to establish an integrated management plan, and the exclusion of stakeholders from governance. It highlights the destruction of old-growth forest habitats and the illegal upgrading of the Narewkowska road, concluding that the site meets the prerequisites for inscription on the List of World Heritage in Danger.

The document provides a toolkit for using social media to engage political candidates during the 2019 UK General Election, specifically urging them to support the #cleanairforchildren campaign. It offers strategic advice for Twitter and Facebook, including the use of specific hashtags and personal storytelling, alongside template posts that call for the implementation of Clean Air Zones and the adoption of World Health Organization guideline levels for particulate matter pollution by 2030.

ClientEarth asserts that Enea and Energa's pursuit of the Ostrołęka C coal plant violates board members' duties of due diligence. The briefing highlights significant financial risks from a reported financing structure that increases equity contributions, potential penalties from the December 2018 capacity market auction due to construction delays, and a changing economic landscape marked by rising carbon prices and Polish government goals to reduce coal reliance.

ClientEarth calls on the European Commission to remedy backlogs in chemical authorisations and restrictions under REACH, arguing that delays prolong exposure to dangerous chemicals and undermine the development of safer alternatives. The document criticises the Commission for allegedly prioritising companies that missed application deadlines over health and environmental protections and demands greater transparency regarding the decision-making process and the reasons for delays.

ClientEarth warns that the Governance Regulation (GR) may allow EU Member States to bypass meaningful public participation during the initial drafting of National Energy and Climate Plans (NECPs). The briefing argues that waiting until after the first draft is submitted to the European Commission risks ignoring the interests of citizens and renewable energy developers in favor of fossil fuel operators. It highlights potential legal breaches of the Aarhus Convention and the SEA Directive, noting that some countries, such as Romania, have provided insufficient consultation windows (seven days). ClientEarth calls for a minimum eight-week consultation period before the first draft submission to ensure all policy options remain open.

The report finds widespread non-compliance with mandatory seafood labelling laws in Spanish fish markets, with up to 70% of required information missing across 266 products. It argues that this lack of transparency hinders sustainable consumption and calls for stricter enforcement and clearer regulations by public authorities.

The document urges EU Fisheries Ministers to set 2019 Total Allowable Catches (TACs) within scientifically advised levels to meet the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) goals by 2020. It recommends that TACs not exceed Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) or precautionary approach limits, calls for the correct implementation of the landing obligation through robust catch documentation like CCTV, and demands greater transparency in the TAC-setting process through public justification of any limits set above scientific advice.

The document outlines NGO recommendations for 2019 fishing opportunities in the Northeast Atlantic and North Sea, urging the Council to set Total Allowable Catches (TACs) within scientifically advised levels to meet the Common Fisheries Policy's Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) objectives by 2020. It specifically addresses the risks of 'TAC rollovers', the implementation of the landing obligation, and the dangers of removing TACs or introducing 'bycatch TACs' for stocks with zero catch advice. The NGOs also call for increased transparency in the Council's decision-making process and the alignment of management areas with scientific assessment units.

The report describes Poland as an EU laggard in energy transition due to an unprecedented dependency on coal and a lack of up-to-date energy strategy. While the power sector is starting to diversify through new RES auctions and gas-fired installations, the report highlights significant challenges, including the '10H rule' blocking onshore wind and a history of poor EU law transposition. It argues that the EU Clean Energy Package and rising carbon costs are key drivers that could accelerate the transition if supported by a stable national legal framework.

The document is an open letter from 41 NGOs supporting the creation of an ECHA database for substances of very high concern (SVHCs) in products, as mandated by Article 9 of the revised Waste Framework Directive. The NGOs argue that this database is essential for a non-toxic circular economy, human health, and environmental protection, countering a position paper from 12 industry groups that sought to replace the database with alternative research and technology investments. The NGOs assert that industry already has a legal obligation under REACH to possess this information and that transparency is necessary for citizens' right to know, market surveillance, and the safety of waste handlers.

The report evaluates Italy's transposition of EU IUU and Control Regulations, finding that while enforcement activities are active, the legal framework contains gaps in the definition of 'serious infringements' and the application of immediate enforcement measures. It highlights a trend toward decriminalization of certain fishing offenses, though it notes the successful use of environmental criminal law to prosecute severe ecosystem damage. The document also identifies a lack of public transparency regarding inspection and sanction data and raises concerns about Italian trawlers operating illegally off West Africa.

ClientEarth defends the salary of CEO James Thornton, citing his professional achievements and the organization's growth. The statement clarifies that funding from the Department for International Development (DFID) for a deforestation project is not used to pay the CEO's salary.

The submission by Alburnus Maior, ICDER, and Greenpeace Romania contends that Gabriel Resources Ltd. failed to conduct adequate due diligence on the feasibility of its Roșia Montană gold mine and ignored the rights of local communities. The authors argue the company violated the right to adequate housing through coercive land acquisition and failed to obtain necessary urban, archaeological, and environmental permits required by Romanian and EU law. They further claim the company attempted to bypass these legal requirements via a proposed 'special law' and used intimidation and misleading media campaigns to silence opposition. Legally, the submission asserts that the tribunal lacks jurisdiction because the dispute necessitates the interpretation of EU law, citing the Achmea precedent, and that the company's unlawful conduct disqualifies its activities as a protected investment under the Canada-Romania BIT.

The document outlines recommendations for the governance of the proposed EU DSO entity, focusing on ensuring it acts as an independent expert body rather than a lobby for commercial interests. It advocates for a formal mandate to contribute to Energy Union climate and energy targets, similar to the obligations of ENTSO-E. To prevent industry capture, the brief recommends ring-fencing Board of Directors meetings from existing DSO associations and expanding the Strategic Advisory group to include a balanced range of stakeholders, including consumer and environmental organisations. It also emphasizes the need for detailed voting and composition rules to protect the representation of smaller DSOs.

ClientEarth urges the European Commission to set 2019 Northeast Atlantic TACs strictly according to scientific advice to meet the 2020 MSY deadline. The organization warns against the removal of TACs to solve 'choke issues' unless risks are low and safeguards are in place, and calls for greater transparency in the decision-making process and socio-economic justifications for any departures from scientific advice.

ClientEarth argues that the European Commission's Proposal for a Collective Redress Directive is too narrow because it focuses primarily on consumer rights. The organization contends that the directive should be expanded to include 'horizontal collective redress,' allowing citizens harmed by industrial pollution, toxic chemicals, and breaches of labour or anti-discrimination laws to seek compensation. ClientEarth rejects concerns over 'abusive litigation,' noting that no such instances have occurred in EU jurisdictions, and calls for NGOs representing environmental and worker interests to be recognized as qualified entities for bringing representative actions.