Search Climate Insights Directory

The report details how neonicotinoids contaminate plants, soil, and water, leading to the decline of pollinators and other essential invertebrates. It argues that these chemicals provide marginal economic benefits while posing significant risks to ecosystem services, and criticizes the Canadian regulatory system for its slow re-evaluation process and historical use of conditional registrations.

The report finds that pharmaceutical companies in Hyderabad continue to discharge untreated or inappropriately treated wastewater containing toxic heavy metals and solvents, leading to severe ecological damage and human health risks. It highlights a failure of local and national regulatory bodies to control these emissions and warns that the situation is deteriorating as production capacity expands. The document specifically links antibiotic production discharges to the global spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and argues that pharmaceutical purchasers in the EU and US must address these supply chain failures.

The report finds that pharmaceutical production in Hyderabad continues to cause severe environmental degradation through the discharge of untreated wastewater containing heavy metals and industrial solvents. It highlights a critical link between these manufacturing practices and the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), a global health threat. The document argues that Indian regulatory bodies are failing to enforce pollution controls and that the pharmaceutical industry's reliance on opaque supply chains allows companies exporting to the US and EU to avoid accountability for their environmental footprint.

The report examines the transition from traditional gray infrastructure to green infrastructure (GI) for stormwater management. It argues that because the benefits of GI are collective while costs are private, public intervention via economic instruments—specifically stormwater markets—is necessary to bridge the investment gap. The document details various price-based and quantity-based instruments, such as stormwater retention credits and environmental impact bonds, and analyzes their application in cities like Washington D.C., Philadelphia, and Halifax.

The document argues that coal mining in Mpumalanga, South Africa, disproportionately harms women and girls by polluting water and air, destroying arable land, and increasing poverty, which in turn leads to higher rates of sexual exploitation and health crises.

Mighty Earth and a coalition of environmental groups support the reduction of US biodiesel mandates, arguing that the fuel is not 'green' because it relies on virgin vegetable oils that drive deforestation in Latin America and Southeast Asia. The document highlights that biodiesel production contributes to carbon emissions and water pollution, such as the Gulf of Mexico's Dead Zone. While the EPA initially sought input on reducing mandates, the document notes that President Trump later intervened to reverse this course due to pressure from agricultural lobbying groups.

The document details how extensive coal mining in Indonesia, particularly in Kalimantan, causes massive deforestation, water contamination, and health issues for local communities. It highlights the conflict between the Indonesian government's goal to add 35,000 MW of coal-based energy and its Paris Agreement commitment to reduce emissions by 29% by 2030. Local communities, supported by WALHI, are campaigning for the revocation of mining permits and the restoration of degraded lands.

The document details how coal mining in Indonesia, particularly in Kalimantan, leads to mass deforestation, water contamination, and health issues such as lung problems from coal dust. It highlights the struggle of communities in villages like Tamiang Layang and Gunung Karasik, who face violence and police pressure while demanding the revocation of mining permits. The text notes a contradiction between the Indonesian government's goal to produce an additional 35,000 MW of energy from coal and its Paris Agreement pledge to reduce emissions by 29% by 2030.

The brief, submitted by Earthjustice on behalf of community members, contends that medical monitoring is essential for detecting and treating health effects linked to PFC exposure, such as various cancers and autoimmune issues. It argues that the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) does not bar private state-law claims for medical monitoring against potentially responsible parties, even while a federal clean-up is ongoing. The document highlights the severe health impacts suffered by residents near the Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Willow Grove and the Naval Air Warfare Center Warminster, and asserts that the District Court erred in applying CERCLA's 'Timing of Review' provision to block these health-related claims.

The report details various cases in Latin America where transnational corporations in mining, energy, agribusiness, and tobacco have violated human rights and caused environmental destruction. It highlights the 'architecture of impunity' created by bilateral investment treaties and the ICSID arbitration system, which allow companies to sue states over public interest policies. The document advocates for a binding international treaty and an independent international tribunal to ensure corporate accountability and the supremacy of human rights over commercial interests.

The report details cases of corporate abuse in Latin America, including mining disasters in Brazil, the assassination of environmental defenders in Mexico and Honduras, and legal battles over public health and water in Uruguay and Argentina. It argues that current international investment frameworks, such as the ICSID, protect corporate profits over human rights and national sovereignty. The authors call for a binding UN treaty to end corporate impunity and the establishment of an international tribunal to hold transnational companies accountable for environmental and social crimes.

A survey of 176 experts reveals that while there is strong scientific support for agroecology, researchers face significant barriers, including a lack of public funding and pressure from entrenched financial interests. The report advocates for the USDA to prioritize interdisciplinary research, extend grant durations, and explicitly incorporate social justice and racial equity into its funding requests.

A coalition of indigenous groups and conservation organizations petitions the U.S. government under the Pelly Amendment to investigate six mining projects in British Columbia (Tulsequah Chief, Red Chris, Schaft Creek, Galore Creek, KSM, and Brucejack). The petitioners argue these mines threaten woodland caribou, grizzly bears, and Pacific salmonids through habitat destruction, toxic pollution, and increased traffic on Highway 37. They specifically highlight the risk of acid mine drainage and tailings dam failures, citing the 2014 Mount Polley disaster. The petition requests a referral to the International Joint Commission to address these transboundary threats to Southeast Alaska's ecosystems and economies.

In Riau, Indonesia, women from villages such as Sungai Berbari and Pungkat are utilizing the Global Forest Watch (GFW) platform and training from the Women Research Institute to combat the negative impacts of large-scale agricultural operations. These operations have caused water pollution, respiratory diseases due to dust and peatland burning, and limited access to healthcare. By overlaying village maps with GFW datasets on tree cover loss and fire alerts, women have gained the evidence needed to link company activities to local environmental issues. This data-driven approach, combined with public speaking and policy training, has enabled them to pressure the government for haze emergency supplies and convince companies to fund reproductive healthcare. Future initiatives include developing a community-based early warning system for forest fires using GFW Fires to improve response times and corporate accountability.

The document argues that the PMRA's re-evaluation of glyphosate is flawed due to the dismissal of critical evidence concerning ecological risks, human health impacts, and the inefficiency of proposed risk management strategies.

The report exposes the destructive nature of irresponsible rayon production, detailing water and air pollution, worker fatalities, and severe health issues in Asia. It identifies a direct link between these polluting factories—operated by conglomerates like Aditya Birla and Lenzing—and major global brands such as H&M, Zara, and ASOS. The document argues that while rayon is often marketed as a 'green' alternative, its current chemical-intensive production is unsustainable, and calls for brands to use their purchasing power to force a transition to closed-loop, non-toxic manufacturing systems.

The report exposes severe pollution from viscose production in Asia, where manufacturers dump untreated wastewater and emit toxic gases, impacting local health and ecosystems. It identifies direct sourcing links between these polluting sites and major brands like H&M and Zara, arguing that the 'green' image of viscose is misleading due to the use of hazardous chemicals like carbon disulphide. The authors call for a transition to closed-loop production systems and mandatory supply chain due diligence.

The report details how the viscose industry in China, India, and Indonesia causes severe water and air pollution, leading to health crises like cancer and birth deformities in local communities. It identifies a lack of transparency in fashion supply chains and argues that a small group of dominant producers, pressured by major brands, could rapidly transition the industry toward closed-loop, non-toxic production systems.

The report details how the rapid growth of the viscose industry in China, India, and Indonesia has led to severe water and air pollution, causing health crises such as cancer and birth defects in local communities. It identifies a lack of transparency in the fashion supply chain and finds that major brands, including H&M, Zara (Inditex), and ASOS, source materials from these polluting factories. The document argues that because the industry is highly concentrated—with 70% of global viscose produced by ten factories—major brands have the leverage to force a transition toward closed-loop production systems and less toxic chemicals.

The report details how the production of viscose, often marketed as an ecological alternative to cotton or synthetics, involves highly polluting chemical processes in China, India, and Indonesia. It documents the discharge of untreated wastewater into local water sources, leading to severe health issues such as cancer and congenital deformities, and the destruction of local ecosystems and traditional livelihoods. The investigation reveals that major global fashion brands, including H&M, Inditex (Zara), and ASOS, source their viscose from these polluting factories. The document argues that because a small group of 10 companies controls approximately 70% of global viscose production, large fashion brands have the purchasing power to force a transition toward closed-loop, less toxic production systems.