Search Climate Insights Directory

The report argues that high perceived investor risks in South East Europe lead to inflated financing costs for renewables, making them less competitive than conventional power plants. It proposes specific de-risking measures—most notably the EU budget guarantee mechanism—that could reduce project costs by up to 20%, potentially bringing onshore wind costs down to 46 EUR/MWh in Greece and 54 EUR/MWh in Serbia.

Levi Strauss & Co. has established science-based targets to reduce scope 1 and 2 emissions by 90% and global supply chain emissions by 40% by 2025. The company achieved a 3% reduction in operational emissions between 2016 and 2017 and is scaling a partnership with the International Finance Corporation to reduce GHG emissions across its top suppliers. Its energy strategy includes a goal of 100% renewable electricity in owned facilities by 2025, supported by green utility contracts, PPAs, and on-site solar. Additionally, the company advocates for federal climate legislation in the US, supports the Paris Climate Agreement, and is a signatory of the Fashion Industry Charter for Climate Action.

Indonesia is currently off target for its 2025 renewable energy goals, with installed capacity at 9.4 GW by the end of 2018, failing to meet the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources' target of 15.5 GW. The report identifies a 'trilemma' where the government struggles to simultaneously keep electricity tariffs low, maintain low subsidy costs, and meet renewable targets. To address this, the authors recommend a moratorium on new coal plants, a massive scale-up of rooftop solar, a shift from biofuels to bioenergy, and a revamp of the pricing mechanism to reflect full economic costs rather than just the local average generation cost (BPP).

The authors propose a market design featuring a regional spot market operated by an independent Regional Transmission Organization (RTO) using locational marginal pricing and security-constrained economic dispatch. To ensure long-term investment in clean resources and manage price risk, the model relies on decentralized bilateral contracts, such as Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs), rather than centralized capacity procurement. The authors contend that this approach facilitates the retirement of fossil fuel generation, promotes innovation in distributed energy resources, and minimizes political interference. They emphasize that public policy instruments, such as carbon pricing or portfolio standards, should complement this market structure by internalizing greenhouse gas externalities to accelerate the transition.

The document examines the risks that current short-term wholesale electricity markets, based on locational marginal prices (LMPs), may fail to provide sufficient price signals to sustain the investment needed for deep decarbonization. This is primarily due to the minimal short-run marginal costs of variable renewable energy (VRE) and the fact that VRE resources often cannot capture scarcity prices during production lulls. To mitigate this, the authors propose long-term markets that provide contractual certainty through power purchase agreements (PPAs) or similar mechanisms. The report compares three specific proposals (by Corneli, Gimon, and Pierpont), identifying six core commonalities: the use of long-term contracts, voluntary participation, coordination with short-term markets, incremental implementation, optimized policy guidance, and organic implementation pathways. The authors suggest that these long-term markets can better identify efficient portfolios of VRE, storage, and flexible load across broad regions, reducing the risk of overbuild or incompatible resource mixes.

The report explores how large utility customers, including cities and corporations, can achieve high renewable energy goals through various procurement models. It details options such as green tariffs, sleeved PPAs, and community solar, while addressing the critical role of Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) in accounting and disclosure. The document emphasizes the need for collaboration between utilities, customers, and regulators to ensure that the transition to carbon-free energy is cost-effective, avoids cross-subsidization of non-participants, and maintains grid reliability.

The document argues that Indonesia's coal price cap, designed to protect the finances of the state-owned utility PLN, acts as a subsidy that locks out renewable energy. By capping coal prices at USD 70 per tonne, the government reduces operational costs for coal plants, making it difficult for renewables to compete under a pricing system based on average generation costs (BPP). The brief suggests alternative policies, such as windfall taxes on coal or 'polluter pays' principles, to support PLN without disadvantaging clean energy.

The document identifies that while high upfront capital costs limit the uptake of rooftop solar PV, several innovative green finance options exist for South African businesses. These include commercial bank funding (asset finance, term loans), Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE), Pay As You Save (PAYS), power purchase agreements (PPAs), and online impact investing platforms. It highlights that solar PV is technically mature, with payback periods typically between 3-8 years and a lifespan of up to 20 years. The brief also details specific offerings from banks like Absa, Nedbank, Standard Bank, and FNB, and lists tax and grant incentives such as 100% accelerated depreciation and the Green Tourism Incentive Programme.

The report identifies a total available energy services market in South Africa valued at approximately R125 billion by 2035, driven by rising electricity costs and falling technology prices. It highlights growth in rooftop solar PV, energy storage, and energy efficiency, while detailing the shift from a single-operator utility model to a distributed generation model. Key emerging opportunities include commercial off-the-shelf systems, project bundling, and building modernisation, supported by innovative finance mechanisms like PACE and a growing framework of municipal small-scale embedded generation (SSEG) regulations.

The document explores the integration of customer clean energy demand into utility planning, focusing on the role of Integrated Resource Plans (IRPs) in the US. It argues that early collaboration between utilities and customers can lead to more efficient clean energy procurement, faster decarbonization, and lower costs. The report details the IRP process, identifies barriers to customer engagement—such as limited resources and lack of transparency—and provides pathways for involvement through direct engagement, stakeholder forums, and regulatory proceedings.

The policy brief examines the "steel for fuel" strategy, where utilities replace fossil fuel plants—which incur pass-through fuel costs with no earnings potential—with wind and solar assets that allow for regulated equity returns. Using Xcel Energy as a primary example, the document explains how this transition can reduce consumer bills through fuel savings while maintaining or increasing shareholder value. It highlights the role of competitive bidding and the balance between utility ownership and independent power producers (IPPs) to ensure the lowest costs for consumers.

The document outlines proposed amendments to India's Electricity Act 2003 to introduce direct benefit transfers for subsidies and promote renewable energy. It notes a government ambition to increase its renewable energy target to 225 GW by 2022, though external analysts are less optimistic. The report highlights a rising fiscal burden from oil subsidies, potentially reaching USD 7.4 billion in FY2019, and details significant financial stress in the power sector. Additionally, it covers the expansion of LPG connections for poor women and the transition of several states to become kerosene-free.

The Centre for Environmental Rights (CER) is challenging the viability of the Thabametsi and Khanyisa coal-fired power projects, arguing that they cannot reach commercial or financial close due to outstanding licenses, pending High Court reviews of environmental authorisations, and a lack of 'value for money' assessments. CER highlights that Eskom has not approved the signing of the power purchase agreements (PPAs) and notes that the draft IRP 2018 suggests new coal-fired power is not part of a least-cost electricity plan.

The report analyzes Indonesia's public finance levers for clean energy, finding that while IDR 12.4 trillion was provided between 2012 and 2016, this is insufficient to meet the 2025 target of 23% renewable energy in the primary energy mix. It identifies key barriers to private investment, including high financing costs and a lack of long-term debt, and argues that capital injections into local development financial institutions (DFIs) like SMI and the use of guarantees are more effective at leveraging private capital than direct budget appropriations. The report recommends adjusting tariff structures to ensure project viability and expanding the role of DFIs to bridge financing gaps.

The document identifies a critical gap in India's goal to achieve 40 GW of rooftop solar by 2022, noting that as of March 2018, capacity was only ~2.53 GW. It argues that while the Commercial and Industrial (C&I) segment is growing, expansion is limited to high-credit entities, leaving MSMEs underserved due to a lack of credit history and collateral. To address this, the authors propose a Credit Guarantee Mechanism (CGM) as a bilateral loss-sharing agreement between a trust fund and lending institutions. This mechanism would provide a Liquidity Backstop Pool for payment delays and a Partial Loss Guarantee Pool for defaults, effectively reducing the risk for banks lending to Renewable Energy Service Companies (RESCOs). The study estimates that $1 million in donor grant capital could mobilize $14 million in capital and install 18 MW of capacity.

Google achieved its goal of matching 100% of its global electricity consumption with renewable energy in 2017, investing over $3.5 billion USD across 26 projects. The company now aims for a 'moonshot' goal of powering operations on a region-specific, 24/7 basis with zero-carbon energy. To achieve this, Google focuses on regional procurement to overcome regulatory barriers, the pursuit of new technologies to manage resource variability, and the promotion of energy policies that empower consumers. Additionally, Google launched the Environmental Insights Explorer in 2018 to help cities estimate carbon emissions and renewable energy potential.

The guide explains the mechanisms of GHG reporting for corporations and utilities, detailing the GHG Protocol's three scopes of emissions. It specifically examines Scope 2 accounting, contrasting location-based and market-based methods and emphasizing the importance of supplier-specific emission factors provided by utilities. The document also outlines the reporting requirements for utilities, such as those under The Climate Registry, and discusses the differences between GHG accounting and renewable energy accounting.

The Life After Coal Campaign urges the South African government to reject the Thabametsi and Khanyisa coal IPP projects, presenting evidence from an Energy Research Centre (ERC) report that these plants would increase system costs by R19.68 billion and raise GHG emissions by 205.7Mt CO2eq over 30 years. The campaign argues that these projects are not needed for medium-term demand, would exacerbate Eskom's financial crisis, and contradict South Africa's commitments under the Paris Agreement.

The Life After Coal Campaign, citing a report by the University of Cape Town's Energy Research Centre (ERC), argues that the Thabametsi and Khanyisa coal-fired power stations are unnecessary, financially risky, and environmentally harmful. The campaign asserts that these projects would increase system costs by R19.68 billion and raise greenhouse gas emissions by 205.7Mt CO2eq over 30 years, potentially accelerating a 'utility death spiral' for Eskom. They contend the projects fail the 'value for money' requirement of the 2011 Electricity Regulations and urge the Minister of Energy to abandon them in favor of more economical renewable energy alternatives.

India faces twin challenges as it scales renewable energy: the need for increased grid flexibility and the risk of coal-based plants becoming economically unviable due to falling plant load factors (PLFs). The report argues that transitioning existing coal plants into flexible resources is a cost-effective short-term solution. This conversion requires technical retrofits to allow for lower minimum loads, reduced start-up times, and increased ramp rates. While this path involves incremental costs of 5-10% of total project costs in NPV terms, it is significantly cheaper than deploying lithium-ion batteries or pumped hydro. The report recommends market-based mechanisms, such as capacity auctions and revised power purchase agreements, to compensate plant owners and ensure a transition toward a low-carbon electricity system.