Browse all documents

RELEVANT INFORMATION CONCERNING THE COAL IPPS – A STUDY BY THE ENERGY RESEARCH CENTRE

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

A letter from the Life After Coal/Impilo Ngaphandle Kwamalahle Campaign to South Africa's Minister of Energy, urging the reconsideration of two coal Independent Power Producer (IPP) projects, Thabametsi and Khanyisa, based on a study by the University of Cape Town’s Energy Research Centre (ERC).

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The University of Cape Town’s Energy Research Centre (ERC) report indicates that the Thabametsi (557MW) and Khanyisa (300MW) coal-fired power stations would cost South Africa an additional R19.68 billion compared to a least-cost energy system.
  • The coal IPPs are deemed unnecessary for South Africa's medium-term electricity demand because alternative sources, such as solar, wind, and flexible gas generation, are more economical.
  • The two coal IPPs are projected to increase greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 205,7Mt CO2eq over the 30-year duration of the power purchase agreements, which would undermine the government's GHG mitigation plans, the Energy Efficiency Strategy to 2050, and commitments under the Paris Agreement.
  • The ERC report suggests that building new coal plants during a period of low demand increases pressure on Eskom by reducing the output of its existing fleet, potentially accelerating a 'utility death spiral' and risking the South African economy.
  • The Life After Coal Campaign asserts that the coal IPP projects are financially and environmentally harmful, noting that the coal IPP price of R1.03 per kilowatt hour is significantly more expensive than recent renewable IPPs and that the plants' emission intensity is nearly 60% higher than Eskom’s Medupi and Kusile plants.

Cite the original document

APA
Centre for Environmental Rights (2018). RELEVANT INFORMATION CONCERNING THE COAL IPPS – A STUDY BY THE ENERGY RESEARCH CENTRE. https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/LAC-letter-to-Min-Radebe-re-ERC-report_4-June-2018.docx.pdf?x21779
Chicago
Centre for Environmental Rights. RELEVANT INFORMATION CONCERNING THE COAL IPPS – A STUDY BY THE ENERGY RESEARCH CENTRE. 2018. https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/LAC-letter-to-Min-Radebe-re-ERC-report_4-June-2018.docx.pdf?x21779.
Wikipedia
{{cite press release |author=Centre for Environmental Rights |title=RELEVANT INFORMATION CONCERNING THE COAL IPPS – A STUDY BY THE ENERGY RESEARCH CENTRE |date=4 June 2018 |url=https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/LAC-letter-to-Min-Radebe-re-ERC-report_4-June-2018.docx.pdf?x21779 |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@misc{centreforenvironmentalrights2018relevant, author = {{Centre for Environmental Rights}}, title = {{RELEVANT INFORMATION CONCERNING THE COAL IPPS – A STUDY BY THE ENERGY RESEARCH CENTRE}}, publisher = {Centre for Environmental Rights}, year = {2018}, month = jun, url = {https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/LAC-letter-to-Min-Radebe-re-ERC-report_4-June-2018.docx.pdf?x21779}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated