Search Climate Insights Directory

The report contends that carbon markets focus exclusively on greenhouse gas emissions, ignoring four key biophysical processes—albedo, evapotranspiration, surface roughness, and aerosols—that allow tropical forests to cool the planet. This omission leads to a significant underestimation of the climate mitigation potential of tropical forests, which the authors claim contribute 50% more to global warming prevention than carbon alone. The document highlights that conservative risk-management standards (such as additionality and leakage tests) further penalize tropical forest credits, particularly in High Forest Low Deforestation (HFLD) countries. It proposes that these non-carbon benefits be treated as additional attributes for pricing or eventually quantified as CO2 equivalents to ensure a more equitable transition for indigenous peoples and local communities.

The report contends that carbon markets focus exclusively on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, failing to account for four key biophysical processes—albedo, evapotranspiration, surface roughness, and aerosols—that allow tropical forests to cool the planet. This omission leads to an underestimation of the mitigation potential of tropical forests, which could provide an additional 1.4 to 1.8 gigatonnes of CO2-equivalent mitigation per year. The authors argue that this creates an inequitable system that penalizes tropical nations and indigenous communities while overvaluing forests in higher latitudes. To correct this, the document recommends incorporating biophysical effects as additional credit attributes, recognizing 'positive biophysical leakage' that enhances landscape resilience, and developing long-term methods to quantify these benefits as CO2 equivalents.

The report reviews a proposed three-year sustainable land management project in four districts of Nepal's Churia Range. While technically sound, the assessment finds a critical lack of social context and gender-inclusive planning. It highlights that the project's design process was dominated by male technical teams and institutional stakeholders, largely excluding women, Dalits, and indigenous people. The report argues that without specific GESI (Gender Equality and Social Inclusion) strategies, the project risks reinforcing elite capture in community forestry and failing to address the specific vulnerabilities of the poorest populations, who are most dependent on forest resources and most affected by climate change.

The ESMF provides a structured approach to managing the risks associated with a project designed to integrate a national human-wildlife conflict (HWC) strategy into Gabon's Project Finance for Permanence (PFP) mechanism. The project targets four national parks—Loango, Mayumba, Minkébé, and Monts de Cristal—to improve coexistence between humans and wildlife, specifically addressing crop-raiding by elephants. Because the project involves Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs), the framework mandates Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC), the development of site-specific Indigenous Peoples Plans (IPPs), and Livelihood Restoration Plans (LRPs) if resource access is restricted. It also outlines a multi-tiered grievance redress mechanism and specific mitigation measures for gender-based violence and sexual exploitation, abuse, and harassment (SEAH).

The research establishes a correlation between gender inequality and lower environmental wellbeing, noting that women's leadership in natural resource management improves governance and environmental outcomes. However, significant gaps persist, including a lack of gender-disaggregated environmental data and the underrepresentation of men and masculinity in conservation literature. The document highlights the critical role of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs), noting that while Indigenous-managed territories show better ecosystem health, Indigenous women are often excluded from decision-making. It recommends shifting power and funding from Global North organizations to local, women-led, and Indigenous organizations, and calls for the 2022 UN Convention on Biological Diversity COP15 to adopt a gender-responsive Global Biodiversity Framework.

The WWF Emergency Amazon Fire Fund raised $1,750,113 to support fire response and recovery in the Amazon between 2019 and 2021. The fund provided firefighting equipment, monitoring technology, and humanitarian aid to partners in Brazil and Bolivia, benefiting over 117,000 people across 77 indigenous lands and conservation areas. Key initiatives included the distribution of over 6,000 pieces of firefighting equipment, the provision of 18 drones for forest monitoring, and the establishment of solar-powered laboratories to support sustainable cusi oil production by women in Bolivia's Chiquitano Dry Forest.

The MaWRiN project aims to enhance climate resilience for indigenous and local communities in Nepal's Marin watershed through nature-based solutions and livelihood improvements. This framework outlines the procedures to identify and mitigate adverse environmental and social impacts, ensuring compliance with both Nepal's national laws and WWF's Safeguards Integrated Policies and Procedures (SIPP). Key components include the development of site-specific Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs), a Process Framework for livelihood restoration, and an Indigenous Peoples Planning Framework (IPPF) based on Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC). The project explicitly prohibits activities involving private land acquisition, physical displacement, commercial logging, and the use of high-risk pesticides.

The document outlines the Environmental and Social Management Framework (MGAS) for a project aimed at the long-term financial sustainability of Peru's National System of Protected Natural Areas (SINANPE) in the Amazon biome. It identifies potential environmental and social risks associated with infrastructure investments and resource management across six pre-selected protected areas. The framework integrates WWF's Integrated Safeguard Policies and Procedures (PPIS), specifically addressing natural habitats, involuntary resettlement, and indigenous peoples. It establishes a governance structure involving PROFONANPE and SERNANP, a grievance mechanism, and requirements for Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (ESIA) for specific investments.

The document outlines pathways for policymakers to halt and reverse biodiversity loss in the ocean, emphasizing the need to align national policies with the Global Biodiversity Framework, mandate corporate accountability, mobilize diverse finance, and ensure inclusive, people-centered governance.