Search Climate Insights Directory

The report critiques the implementation of biomass co-firing in West Java's coal power plants, specifically PLTU Indramayu and PLTU Pelabuhan Ratu. It argues that the program facilitates 'false' carbon neutrality claims while causing significant deforestation, land conflicts, and ecological damage. The authors highlight a gap between national energy targets and the reality of biomass sourcing, which often relies on illegal logging or 'fraudulent' practices by Perhutani, rather than sustainable energy forests (HTE).

The document presents a framework for a just energy transition in Indonesia, demanding a shift from extractive, centralistic energy patterns to regenerative, democratic ones. It calls for the gradual closure of all coal-fired power plants by 2040, the rejection of 'false solutions' like fossil gas and nuclear power, and the establishment of a transparent, multi-stakeholder management organ to oversee the process. Central to these demands are the protection of human rights, the inclusion of vulnerable groups in decision-making, and the ensuring of energy affordability and ownership for local communities.

The document details the negative impacts of Harita Group's nickel operations on Obi Island, including marine pollution, forced relocation of residents, and workplace fatalities. It highlights the company's reliance on coal-fired power plants (PLTU) and argues that the IPO of PT Trimegah Bangun Persada Tbk (NCKL) enables further destruction. The text specifically criticizes investors like Glencore and Fidelity International, as well as several global banking underwriters, for breaching net-zero and Paris Agreement commitments by supporting the company.

The document critiques the April 2023 IPO of PT Trimegah Bangun Persada Tbk (NCKL), alleging that the capital increase will fund further environmental degradation and social displacement on Obi Island. It highlights the use of coal-fired power plants (PLTU) for nickel processing, illegal waste disposal into the sea, and workplace fatalities. The report further claims that investors like Glencore and Fidelity International, and several underwriting banks, are violating their net-zero and Paris Agreement commitments by supporting Harita Group.

The report argues that Indonesia's energy transition is being 'hijacked' by established conglomerates and politically connected elites who dominate the supply chain for biomass co-firing in coal-fired power plants (PLTU). It highlights that while PT PLN aims to replace 5-10% of coal with wood biomass by 2025, the land requirements for this—estimated between 2.3 million and 3.9 million hectares—threaten massive deforestation and land grabbing. The document identifies several large groups, including Sinarmas, Medco, and Jhonlin, as key actors using 'shadow companies' or political ties to secure concessions, often leading to conflicts with indigenous and local communities. It further notes a lack of transparency in biomass sourcing, where sawdust from small-scale businesses is used instead of the planned wood pellets, bypassing legality checks.

The document argues that Indonesia is facing a climate emergency, evidenced by record temperatures in Larantuka and high greenhouse gas emissions. It criticizes the government's continued investment in coal-fired power plants (PLTU), the use of biomass co-firing which leads to deforestation, and the environmental damage caused by nickel mining for electric vehicle batteries. The guide advocates for community-based renewable energy and provides a roadmap for individuals to reduce their carbon footprint and engage in collective political pressure to demand accountability from policymakers.

The complaint argues that the Jawa 9 and 10 coal power plant project, with a combined capacity of 2,000 MW, causes severe environmental and social harm to the local community in Cilegon, Banten. It alleges that the project is unnecessary due to electricity overcapacity in the Java-Bali grid and that its Environmental Impact Assessment (AMDAL) is fatally flawed, failing to adequately address cumulative pollution, climate impacts, and forced displacements. The complainants assert that the IFC failed in its due diligence and oversight of Bank KEB Hana Indonesia, which provided $56 million in funding to the project developer, PT Indo Raya Tenaga, despite being a pilot client for the IFC's 'Green Equity Approach'. The document details reports of community intimidation, loss of livelihoods for farmers and fishers, and significant health risks, including respiratory infections. The complainants request a full compliance investigation, fair compensation for losses, and a systemic change in IFC policy to eliminate indirect support for coal projects.

The report critiques the Indonesian government's plan to move its capital to East Kalimantan, specifically in the Penajam Paser Utara and Kutai Kartanegara regencies. It argues that the project is a 'political commodity' designed to benefit oligarchs and corporations who hold extensive mining, forestry, and plantation concessions in the area. The document highlights significant environmental threats, including the destruction of mangrove ecosystems in Balikpapan Bay, the risk of floods, and continued reliance on coal power. It also warns of the marginalization and potential eviction of indigenous peoples, such as the Balik tribe, and criticizes the lack of transparency in financing and public participation.

The position paper criticizes the Indonesian government's decision to deactivate the BPJS health insurance status of approximately 11–13.5 million PBI (Contribution Assistance Recipients) members starting February 1, 2026. The author contends that this policy, justified as data updating, is a systemic violation of constitutional health rights and a failure of governance. The document highlights a contradiction where the state expands high-risk industries (like coal and nickel) that increase health burdens while simultaneously cutting health safety nets. It further argues that the government prioritizes 'political image' and 'lighthouse programs'—such as energy transition and global peace contributions—over the basic health needs of the poor, as evidenced by budget allocations that far exceed the PBI health budget. The paper concludes with recommendations for a moratorium on deactivations, financing reform, and industrial accountability for health impacts.

The report argues that the relocation of Indonesia's capital to East Kalimantan is a 'mega project' designed to benefit political oligarchs and corporations rather than the public. It highlights that the proposed 180,965-hectare site is not empty land but is already occupied by numerous mining, forestry, and plantation concessions linked to high-ranking politicians and their families. The document warns of severe ecological risks, including the destruction of mangrove ecosystems in Balikpapan Bay, the persistence of coal-fired power plants (PLTU), and the displacement of indigenous groups like the Suku Balik. It further criticizes the lack of public participation and the financial instability of the project, which estimates a cost of Rp 466 trillion.

Trend Asia critiques Indonesia's critical minerals industry, specifically nickel, as a 'green extractivism' model. The report alleges that the government uses National Strategic Project (NSP) status to bypass environmental laws, leading to massive deforestation, toxic pollution from coal-fired power plants, and severe labor abuses. It highlights a heavy dependence on Chinese capital, which it claims creates a vertical monopoly that exports value while leaving ecological and social devastation in Indonesia, including health crises and the loss of food sovereignty.

The document details two environmental justice studies. The first analyzed PM2.5 emissions from natural gas and coal-fired power plants in the Northeast US between 2011 and 2015. The second used GIS buffer analysis to determine if low-income households and people of color live closer to PFAS-contaminated facilities than white or higher-income households in the US and Michigan. Findings for PFAS contamination show that in Michigan, 48.72% of households within five miles of a contaminated site are low-income, compared to 14.51% statewide. Nationally, people of color represent 34.59% of the population within three miles of PFAS sites, compared to 27.03% of the general US population.

The Union of Concerned Scientists outlines ten primary ways to lower personal carbon emissions and financial costs, ranging from improving vehicle fuel economy and home energy efficiency to dietary changes and reduced consumption. A final recommendation emphasizes the collective impact of these actions, stating that a 20 percent emission reduction by all Americans could lead to the closure of 200 of the 600 coal plants in the United States.

The document details the construction of the EW3 database, which integrates 2008 Energy Information Administration (EIA) data with NREL and Argonne National Laboratory water coefficients to estimate freshwater withdrawals and consumption. It describes the process of mapping cooling systems to specific generators, using Google Earth to verify cooling types, and applying the Water Supply Stress Index (WaSSI) to identify watersheds where electricity generation significantly increases water stress. The methodology also covers the projection of water use through 2036 using the Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS) model and the calculation of water and carbon intensities for the top 15 U.S. electricity providers.

The Union of Concerned Scientists and various endorsing organizations call for U.S. legislation to limit global warming to 2 degrees Celsius. The proposal advocates for economy-wide emission cuts of 25% by 2020 and 80% by 2050 (relative to 1990 levels), the implementation of a cap-and-auction system to fund mitigation and climate justice, and a strategic shift toward renewable energy and energy efficiency to create green-collar jobs and protect vulnerable communities.

The U.S. electricity system relies heavily on freshwater, with cooling power plants accounting for 41 percent of all freshwater withdrawals. This dependence creates a 'collision' where energy production competes with municipal, agricultural, and ecosystem needs, a situation exacerbated by global warming. The report details regional risks—such as hydropower instability in the Northwest and cooling water shortages in the Southeast—and highlights low-water alternatives like wind, solar photovoltaic, and dry-cooling systems.

The Union of Concerned Scientists identifies a range of 153 to 353 coal-fired generating units in the U.S. that are economically uncompetitive and should be retired. These units, totaling up to 59 GW of capacity, are typically older, underutilized, and lack modern pollution controls. The report argues that retiring these units, alongside 288 already scheduled for closure, would not jeopardize grid reliability and could reduce annual CO2 emissions by 245 to 410 million tons if replaced by natural gas, renewables, or energy efficiency.

The document describes federal and state-level efforts in the United States to lower greenhouse gas emissions, highlighting the President’s Climate Action Plan and the role of state policies and economic trends in shifting energy production away from coal.

WRI analysis indicates that Michigan can reduce its CO2 emissions by 33 percent below 2011 levels by 2020 using current state policies and infrastructure. Key opportunities include meeting the renewable portfolio standard through in-state generation, increasing combined heat and power capacity, fully utilizing existing combined cycle natural gas capacity, and improving the efficiency of coal-fired power plants.

The document evaluates over 20 combinations of power-generating technologies and cooling systems to identify strategies for reducing the environmental footprint of China's power sector. It highlights energy efficiency as the most cost-effective and impactful strategy for reducing both emissions and water use. While wind and run-of-river hydroelectric power are identified as low-impact alternatives, the report warns that certain low-carbon technologies, such as Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), can significantly increase water consumption. The World Resources Institute recommends that China implement sectoral water withdrawal quotas and align technology deployment with regional water availability.