Search Climate Insights Directory

The document identifies a shift from absolute climate denial to 'strategic skepticism,' where powerful economic and political actors intentionally spread misleading narratives to obstruct climate action. It highlights that policymakers are primary targets of this disinformation, which erodes public trust in science and creates a feedback loop of political inaction. To counter this, the report recommends standardized carbon reporting legislation, litigation against greenwashing, the formation of multi-stakeholder coalitions, and enhanced scientific and media literacy.

The International Panel on the Information Environment (IPIE) proposes three primary regulatory interventions for AI in the UK: mandatory human rights impact assessments for high-risk systems, accountability frameworks for Generative AI in elections, and mandatory data access for independent AI auditing to resolve information asymmetries.

The document examines the dual-use nature of AI in peacebuilding, highlighting its potential to improve early warning systems, civic engagement, and humanitarian mapping while warning against risks such as digital repression, algorithmic bias, and the erosion of human oversight. It argues that for AI to support peace rather than instability, it must be governed by human rights principles, transparency, and community participation.

The document explores the dual-use nature of AI in conflict zones, highlighting its potential to improve early warning systems, inclusive dialogue, and humanitarian mapping, while warning against its use for surveillance, disinformation, and repression. It argues that for AI to effectively support peacebuilding, it must be governed by human rights principles, transparency, and local community participation.

The document examines the dual-use nature of AI in conflict zones, highlighting its potential to improve early warning systems, scale digital dialogue, and accelerate humanitarian mapping, while warning against risks of surveillance, misinformation, and algorithmic bias. It argues that AI should complement rather than replace human diplomacy and must be governed by human rights principles and local community engagement.

The report analyzes 215 incidents of GenAI use in 2024 elections across 50 countries, finding that 80% of these countries experienced GenAI-related incidents. The vast majority of use (90%) focused on content creation, and 69% of incidents were classified as harmful. A significant portion of GenAI content (46%) remains unattributed, while 20% is linked to foreign actors, all of whom were found to have harmful intentions. The document advocates for mandatory disclosure and transparency standards to protect electoral processes.

The report analyzes 215 incidents of generative AI (GenAI) use during 2024 national elections across 50 countries. It finds that 80% of these countries experienced GenAI-related incidents, with 90% of cases involving the creation of synthetic content such as audio, images, and video. Approximately 69% of these incidents were classified as harmful, often involving impersonation or disinformation. While 38% of uses were deemed useful—such as for civic outreach or simplifying communications—nearly half of all incidents (46%) came from unknown sources, complicating accountability and transparency.

The report analyzes 215 incidents of GenAI use in 2024 elections, finding that 80% of countries with competitive elections experienced such incidents. The majority of these cases involved content creation (90%) and were deemed harmful to the electoral process (69%). A significant portion of the sources remain unknown (46%), while political candidates (25%) and foreign actors (20%) are the primary identified sources. The document recommends transparency standards and disclosure requirements to protect electoral integrity.

The report finds that 80% of countries with competitive national elections in 2024 experienced GenAI-related incidents, with 69% of these being harmful. Most incidents involved content creation, such as deepfakes, and nearly half had unknown sources. While some candidates used GenAI for positive voter outreach, the majority of use—especially by foreign actors—was deceptive or malicious.

The document analyzes the role of Generative AI in 2024 national elections across 50 countries. It finds that 80% of these countries experienced GenAI incidents, with 90% of those cases involving content creation such as audio, images, and video. A significant portion of these incidents (69%) were classified as harmful to electoral integrity, and nearly half (46%) originated from unknown sources. The report highlights specific examples of misuse in countries like Romania, Bangladesh, and Taiwan, while noting some beneficial uses in Japan. It concludes by recommending mandatory disclosure standards and increased transparency to protect democratic processes.

The 2025 IPIE expert survey reveals growing pessimism about the global information environment, with 72% of respondents expecting it to worsen. The report highlights a 'chilling effect' on researchers, the complex dual role of social media in promoting political participation while increasing polarization, and a strong expert consensus on the need for clear labeling of AI-generated content and regular algorithmic audits to safeguard cognitive security.

The 2025 IPIE expert survey reveals growing pessimism regarding the global information environment, with 72% of experts expecting further deterioration. While social networks are seen as drivers of both political polarization and engagement, researchers face significant barriers including self-censorship and harassment. The report advocates for systemic safeguards in the AI era, such as mandatory content labeling and algorithmic audits, to protect the integrity of information supply chains.

The 2025 IPIE Expert Survey reveals increasing pessimism regarding the global information environment, with 72% of experts expecting it to worsen. While social media is seen as a driver of both political polarization and participation, researchers face significant barriers, including harassment and self-censorship. Experts advocate for specific AI safeguards, such as mandatory labeling of synthetic content and periodic algorithmic audits, to protect the reliability of information supply chains.

The 2025 Expert Survey on the Global Information Environment reveals growing pessimism, with 72% of experts expecting the information environment to worsen. The report highlights a complex relationship with social media, where platforms are seen to increase polarization while promoting political participation. It also documents significant 'chilling effects' on researchers, with 73% reporting harassment, self-censorship, or funding fears. To safeguard epistemic security in the AI era, experts recommend clear labeling of AI-generated content and regular algorithmic audits.

The 2025 IPIE expert survey reveals a growing pessimism regarding the global information environment, with 72% of experts believing it is deteriorating. The document highlights the dual nature of social media—increasing both political polarization and engagement—and reports significant pressures on researchers, including self-censorship and harassment. It advocates for 'epistemic security' through measures such as clear labeling of AI-generated content and regular algorithmic audits.

The report identifies a shift from outright climate denialism to 'strategic skepticism,' where powerful economic and political actors sow doubt about the feasibility and cost of climate solutions. It highlights that policymakers are primary targets of this misinformation, which is disseminated through corporate reports, lobbies, and social media, ultimately eroding public trust and delaying climate action. The document recommends four key policy levers: standardized carbon reporting legislation, litigation against greenwashing, the creation of multi-stakeholder coalitions, and enhanced science and media literacy.

The International Panel on the Information Environment (IPIE) urges the Australian government to implement mandatory standardized climate disclosure to stop greenwashing, create transparent tracking systems for climate communication funding to expose hidden influence networks, and integrate climate information literacy and 'inoculation' strategies into education curricula to build public resilience.

The report identifies a highly interlinked ecosystem on Telegram where pro-Kremlin narratives permeate conspiracy and radical communities in Europe. It finds that while pro-Kremlin and conspiracy groups are strongly connected across France, Germany, and Italy, the level of interaction with far-right groups varies by country, being stronger in France and Germany than in Italy. The study highlights the role of Russian state-affiliated channels and influencers, such as Alina Lipp, in bridging ideological divides and amplifying disinformation, particularly regarding the Russia-Ukraine war and COVID-19.

The CCOA Toolkit is a comprehensive guide for combating online antisemitism, focusing on the method of 'deconstruction' to dismantle harmful stereotypes. It analyzes how social media algorithms and business models amplify hate, identifies various forms of antisemitism—including anti-Judaism, Nazi ideology, and secondary antisemitism—and provides educational activities to build critical digital literacy. The document also examines the legal landscape, specifically the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA), and advocates for a public health approach to prevention and trauma-sensitive content moderation.

The document analyzes the spillover of conflict-related online risks—such as disinformation, hate speech, and technology-facilitated gender-based violence—into domestic environments. It argues that while the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA) and UK's Online Safety Act (OSA) were not primarily designed for conflict settings, their systemic risk assessments and crisis protocols can be leveraged to hold platforms accountable. The brief highlights critical gaps, including the erasure of war crime evidence due to over-moderation and the role of engagement-driven algorithms in amplifying harmful content. It recommends structured cross-border cooperation, the development of evidence-preservation protocols, and a shift toward outcome-based metrics in platform risk reporting.