Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The report analyzes 215 incidents of GenAI use in 2024 elections, finding that 80% of countries with competitive elections experienced such incidents. The majority of these cases involved content creation (90%) and were deemed harmful to the electoral process (69%). A significant portion of the sources remain unknown (46%), while political candidates (25%) and foreign actors (20%) are the primary identified sources. The document recommends transparency standards and disclosure requirements to protect electoral integrity.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Generative AI was utilized in 80% of the countries that held competitive national elections in 2024. The highest number of recorded incidents occurred in India and the United States, with 30 cases each.
  • The primary application of GenAI in elections is content creation, accounting for 90% of reported incidents. This includes the production of audio messages, images, videos, and social media posts.
  • Attributing the source of GenAI content is difficult, as the origin was unknown in 46% of cases. Among identified sources, political candidates and parties accounted for 25%, and foreign actors accounted for 20%.
  • The majority of GenAI applications in elections are detrimental, with 69% of recorded incidents classified as harmful. Notably, 100% of the GenAI use attributed to foreign actors served harmful purposes.
  • While largely harmful, GenAI has been used constructively by some political actors. In Japan, candidates used GenAI-powered chatbots to engage with voters, and 38% of reported uses by national political parties and candidates were classified as useful.
  • Specific examples of harmful GenAI use include a deepfake video in Bangladesh falsely announcing a candidate's withdrawal, a manipulated video in Taiwan targeting a presidential candidate, and cloned audio of US President Joe Biden in Namibia to support local parties.

Cite the original document

APA
International Panel on the Information Environment (2025). Generative KI in Wahlkampagnen: Kartierung globaler Muster. https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/643ecb10be528d2c1da863cb/690a0ca6fcede156eee4ac8e_Final%20DE%20Elections%20SFP.pdf
Chicago
International Panel on the Information Environment. Generative KI in Wahlkampagnen: Kartierung globaler Muster. 2025. https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/643ecb10be528d2c1da863cb/690a0ca6fcede156eee4ac8e_Final%20DE%20Elections%20SFP.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=International Panel on the Information Environment |title=Generative KI in Wahlkampagnen: Kartierung globaler Muster |date=2025 |url=https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/643ecb10be528d2c1da863cb/690a0ca6fcede156eee4ac8e_Final%20DE%20Elections%20SFP.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{internationalpanelontheinformationenvironment2025generative, author = {{International Panel on the Information Environment}}, title = {{Generative KI in Wahlkampagnen: Kartierung globaler Muster}}, institution = {International Panel on the Information Environment}, year = {2025}, url = {https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/643ecb10be528d2c1da863cb/690a0ca6fcede156eee4ac8e_Final%20DE%20Elections%20SFP.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated