Генеративный ИИ в избирательных кампаниях: составление карты глобальных закономерностей

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The report analyzes 215 incidents of GenAI use in 2024 elections across 50 countries, finding that 80% of these countries experienced GenAI-related incidents. The vast majority of use (90%) focused on content creation, and 69% of incidents were classified as harmful. A significant portion of GenAI content (46%) remains unattributed, while 20% is linked to foreign actors, all of whom were found to have harmful intentions. The document advocates for mandatory disclosure and transparency standards to protect electoral processes.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Generative AI was present in the vast majority of competitive national elections in 2024, with 80% of the 50 studied countries recording incidents. The highest volume of incidents occurred in India and the United States, with 30 incidents each.
  • The primary application of GenAI in elections is the production of synthetic content, accounting for 90% of recorded incidents. This includes the creation of audio messages, images, videos, and social media posts, often used to fabricate statements or impersonate figures.
  • Attribution of GenAI content is frequently impossible, with 46% of incidents having an unknown source. Among known sources, political candidates and parties were responsible for 25%, while foreign actors accounted for 20%.
  • Most GenAI applications in the studied elections were harmful, with 69% of incidents classified as having a negative role. Notably, 100% of GenAI use attributed to foreign actors was intended to be harmful.
  • While predominantly harmful, GenAI has been used constructively by some political parties (38% of their cases were 'useful'), such as using chatbots in Japan to engage voters or creating content in local dialects to reach underserved populations.
  • The report highlights specific high-impact cases, such as in Romania, where coordinated GenAI and information campaigns contributed to the annulment of presidential election results.

Cite the original document

APA
International Panel on the Information Environment (2025). Генеративный ИИ в избирательных кампаниях: составление карты глобальных закономерностей. https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/643ecb10be528d2c1da863cb/690a0c994389c3a190966c3b_Final%20RU%20Elections%20SFP.pdf
Chicago
International Panel on the Information Environment. Генеративный ИИ в избирательных кампаниях: составление карты глобальных закономерностей. 2025. https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/643ecb10be528d2c1da863cb/690a0c994389c3a190966c3b_Final%20RU%20Elections%20SFP.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=International Panel on the Information Environment |title=Генеративный ИИ в избирательных кампаниях: составление карты глобальных закономерностей |date=2025 |url=https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/643ecb10be528d2c1da863cb/690a0c994389c3a190966c3b_Final%20RU%20Elections%20SFP.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{internationalpanelontheinformationenvironment2025, author = {{International Panel on the Information Environment}}, title = {{Генеративный ИИ в избирательных кампаниях: составление карты глобальных закономерностей}}, institution = {International Panel on the Information Environment}, year = {2025}, url = {https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/643ecb10be528d2c1da863cb/690a0c994389c3a190966c3b_Final%20RU%20Elections%20SFP.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated