Search Climate Insights Directory

The document defines Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) as tradable instruments representing one megawatt hour (MWh) of renewable electricity generation. It distinguishes between compliance markets, driven by state policies like Renewable Portfolio Standards, and voluntary markets driven by consumer preference. The text highlights the importance of third-party certification, such as Green-e®, to ensure credibility and outlines how factors like technology type and local demand influence pricing. It further clarifies that RECs differ from carbon offsets and explains the distinction between bundled green electricity and unbundled REC purchases.

The document defines a greenhouse gas offset as a unit of carbon dioxide-equivalent (CO2e) reduced, avoided, or sequestered to compensate for emissions elsewhere. It outlines five essential criteria for environmental integrity: offsets must be real (representing actual reductions relative to a baseline), permanent (not reversible), additional (resulting from carbon market incentives rather than business-as-usual), verifiable (monitored by independent third parties), and enforceable (tracked via registries to prevent double counting). The text distinguishes between regulatory markets, where government agencies set standards, and voluntary markets, which rely on various independent standards for quality assurance. It notes that while offsets can support corporate emissions strategies after internal mitigation is maximized, future climate programs are more likely to recognize internal abatement over offsets.

The briefing explains that carbon offsets can lower compliance costs in cap-and-trade systems by allowing regulated sources to compensate for emissions through reductions at unregulated sources. To maintain system integrity, offsets must be "real, surplus (or additional), verifiable, permanent, and enforceable." The author highlights that forestry and agriculture projects face higher quantification uncertainties—including measurement, baseline, leakage, and reversibility risks—which increase transaction costs for certification. Consequently, the document suggests that direct payments may be a more cost-effective alternative to offset markets for these specific high-uncertainty project types.

The GHG Protocol for Project Accounting establishes a framework for project developers to credibly quantify GHG reductions by comparing project emissions against a counter-factual baseline. It details two primary baseline procedures—project-specific and performance standard—and emphasizes the importance of defining a GHG assessment boundary that includes both primary and significant secondary effects. The guide outlines six core accounting principles (relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy, and conservativeness) and provides detailed requirements for monitoring and reporting reductions to ensure environmental integrity and transparency.

The report concludes that the realistic potential for large-scale soil carbon sequestration is limited due to scientific uncertainties, practical implementation challenges, and nutrient requirements. It argues against treating soil carbon as a primary offset for emissions, suggesting instead a 'no-regrets' strategy where carbon sequestration is a cobenefit of boosting crop and pasture productivity, agroforestry, and soil restoration, particularly in nutrient-deficient regions like sub-Saharan Africa.

The document examines the relationship between the Paris Agreement and aviation emissions, asserting that the ICAO's goal of stabilizing net emissions at 2020 levels is inconsistent with the Paris Agreement's objective to limit global temperature increases to 1.5°C or well below 2°C. It notes that while the Paris Agreement covers all anthropogenic emissions, it does not specify how to address international transport, leaving a gap that the ICAO's GMBM must fill. The briefing emphasizes that domestic aviation emissions fall under nationally determined contributions (NDCs), which account for one third of total aviation emissions. It further highlights that Article 6 of the Paris Agreement provides essential frameworks for the environmental integrity of carbon markets, which are critical since the GMBM relies heavily on offsets. The document concludes that ICAO member states, all of whom are parties to the Paris Agreement, must ensure the GMBM reflects the Agreement's spirit of increasing ambition over time.

The report details the 'Water Disciples' programme, which integrated environmental education on groundwater with spiritual teachings for youth and faith communities in the Western Cape. Key activities included nature hikes to Table Mountain springs, community clean-ups in Nyanga and Athlone, and the development of educational materials for Sunday Schools. While COVID-19 hindered some planned collaborations and events, the project achieved significant reach through the World Council of Churches and the Diocese of Cape Town's Synod resolution on groundwater.