Search Climate Insights Directory

The testimony by Jennifer Morgan of the World Resources Institute emphasizes the necessity of integrating climate change risks into energy resource development and infrastructure planning. It urges Congress to review federal agency authorities regarding climate risk, support impact assessments for energy infrastructure, and implement comprehensive, long-term policies to drive clean energy competitiveness. Specific recommendations for energy efficiency include improving product labeling for informed consumer choice and updating efficiency standards for vehicles and appliances. The document calls for bipartisan agreement on policies that diversify domestic energy production and maximize the deployment of low-carbon technologies through funding and incentives.

The analysis finds that existing corporate disclosure guidance lacks a robust, shared approach to identifying and assessing physical climate risks, featuring inconsistent terminology that rarely aligns with IPCC standards. The paper notes that some IPCC-highlighted hazards are overlooked and that there is a lack of comprehensive metrics for quantifying risk factors, although water stress and flooding are the most extensively documented hazards.

The document provides a comparative analysis of climate policy tools in the US and China. It details the US's reliance on subnational carbon pricing and evolving SEC disclosure rules, and China's implementation of the world's largest emissions trading system (ETS) and its 'common but differentiated responsibilities' approach to international finance. It concludes by suggesting cooperation on sustainable procurement, emission accounting standards, and subnational carbon market exchanges.

The case study argues that forests influence climate stability through biophysical processes—albedo, evapotranspiration, surface roughness, and aerosols—beyond the carbon cycle. In Chile, the loss of over 40% of forest cover, particularly the matorral in the central region, has likely contributed to local temperature increases and exacerbated the 'Mega Drought' (2010-2018). The authors propose enhancing Chile's Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC), Long-Term Climate Strategy, and REDD+ frameworks by incorporating non-carbon cooling effects as performance indicators and targets. They also suggest expanding the ARClim risk assessment platform to include deforestation-induced warming to better prioritize adaptation measures in agriculture and public health.

The document argues that forests influence climate not only through carbon sequestration but also through biophysical processes—albedo, evapotranspiration, surface roughness, and aerosols—which affect temperature and precipitation. In Chile, the conversion of native vegetation to crops and pastures has been linked to local surface temperature increases of up to 4°C. The authors suggest that Chile can enhance its Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC), Long-Term Climate Strategy, and REDD+ strategies by incorporating these non-carbon effects as performance indicators and adaptation goals. Specifically, they recommend prioritizing native species over exotic plantations to maximize cooling effects and utilizing the ARClim digital platform to identify areas at risk of non-carbon warming.

WRI's Climate Change Investment Statement establishes a framework to transition its endowment portfolio to net-zero GHG emissions by 2050, aiming for alignment with a 1.5°C future. The strategy is built on five objectives: identifying material climate issues, reducing risk exposure, investing in low-carbon and just transition solutions, engaging with companies and managers, and disclosing progress. Key quantitative targets include the total divestment of thermal coal, oil, and gas reserves by April 2020 and increasing private market commitments to sustainable-development-aligned investments to 15% of the portfolio by 2022.

The document outlines the achievements of the Global Commission on Adaptation, specifically the role of the World Resources Institute (WRI) in co-managing the initiative. It highlights the 'Adapt Now' report, which argues that climate adaptation is a human, environmental, and economic imperative, with benefit-cost ratios for investments ranging from 2:1 to 10:1. The report details a 'Year of Action' that mobilized over 170 partners across tracks including finance, agriculture, resilient cities, and nature-based solutions. Key outcomes include the mobilization of $790 million for small-scale food producers, the creation of the 'Principles for Locally Led Adaptation', and the launch of the '1,000 Cities Adapt Now' program. The document concludes by calling for scaled-up climate finance for developing countries and the integration of climate risks into national budgetary and policy decisions.

The document argues that Nature-based Solutions (NbS) are underutilized for climate change adaptation because policy makers and practitioners often perceive them only as biodiversity measures rather than critical tools for flood control, drought mitigation, and coastal protection. It identifies several barriers, including institutional silos, a lack of robust performance metrics, and the prioritization of familiar engineered solutions. To address these, the briefing recommends cross-sectoral communication, the use of participatory and inclusive approaches, and the integration of NbS into educational curricula. It highlights successful initiatives such as the Nature-based Solutions Initiative (NBSI) and specific projects in Grenada, Peru, and Sub-Saharan Africa as models for increasing awareness and mainstreaming NbS.

The executive summary outlines guidelines for linear infrastructure—such as roads, railways, and power lines—in snow leopard habitats. It argues that such infrastructure causes habitat fragmentation and increases human-wildlife conflict, risks which are further exacerbated by climate change. The guidelines advocate for a mitigation hierarchy to avoid, manage, and reduce environmental impacts across a project's entire life cycle, emphasizing environmental sustainability, stakeholder engagement, and the restoration of fragile high-elevation landscapes.