Search Climate Insights Directory

The report examines the nexus between youth employment and Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) technology in Ghana. It finds a significant disconnect between national policy frameworks and the operational realities of youth-led startups, which face severe constraints in financing, regulatory compliance, and market adoption. While Indigenous knowledge is heavily integrated into product design, it lacks formal policy support and documentation. The study recommends streamlining business registration, operationalizing the National Green Jobs Strategy, and creating targeted financial and gender-inclusive support systems to scale CSA tech as a viable employment pathway for Ghanaian youth.

The report reviews the GCF's country ownership framework, finding that while National Designated Authorities (NDAs) are recognized as leaders, they often lack the capacity for inclusive stakeholder coordination and monitoring and evaluation (M&E). It highlights the importance of Country Programmes (CPs) and the role of Direct Access Entities (DAEs), while noting challenges in private sector engagement and long proposal approval timelines. Drawing on best practices from organizations like the Global Fund (GFATM) and the Global Partnership for Education (GPE), the report recommends establishing formal country coordination platforms, accelerating DAE accreditation, and improving accountability through mandatory sharing of Annual Progress Reports (APRs) with NDAs.

The report explores the potential for a digital transition of the UNFCCC process, finding broad stakeholder support for moving technical and preparatory activities online, while highlighting significant concerns regarding power imbalances, the digital divide, and the loss of informal relationship-building essential for political consensus.

The document analyzes why the APRM process in Zambia has lost momentum despite early innovative practices. It identifies a lack of funding, poor coordination within civil society, and the disbandment of the civil society APRM Secretariat in 2011 as key drivers of this decline. The authors argue that the APRM has become dominated by the government post-review and is not central to Zambia's broader governance discourse. Recommendations include integrating the APRM into national development plans, increasing media coverage, and improving budgeting guidance from the continental APRM Secretariat.

The document examines how the Japanese steel industry, a major global producer, can engage in climate mitigation under post-2012 frameworks. It contrasts sectoral approaches—which are favored by energy-intensive industries to prevent carbon leakage and maintain competitiveness—with cap-and-trade systems. The author proposes four options for integration: incorporating sectoral approaches into Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) or CDM reforms, establishing agreements outside the UNFCCC, relying on non-binding recognition of commitments, or implementing transnational sectoral trading. It concludes that while the Japanese government's support for sectoral approaches shifted under the Hatoyama administration, the industry continues to support them due to low costs and international competition risks.

The report argues that woody biomass is a low-carbon substitute for fossil fuels that can support forest health and rural economies if managed sustainably. It identifies high harvesting and transport costs, a lack of site-specific scientific data, and public distrust of federal land management as primary barriers. The author recommends technology-neutral energy incentives, the establishment of national environmental indicators, and the use of collaborative, multi-stakeholder frameworks to ensure biomass harvesting complements ecological restoration and biodiversity conservation.

The report details a six-week online dialogue involving 155 participants from 118 organisations, primarily from Southeast and South Asia. It examines the tension between technocratic 'top-down' approaches and community-based 'bottom-up' strategies for disaster preparedness. Key findings highlight that over-reliance on high-tech sensors often overlooks the 'first mile'—the social elements and community needs essential for effective warning response. The document also identifies systemic barriers, including a lack of sub-national government resources, reliance on unsustainable volunteerism, and the failure to address socio-economic vulnerabilities such as poverty and gender inequality in risk knowledge dissemination.

The report evaluates Thailand's post-2004 tsunami disaster risk reduction (DRR) and early warning system (EWS) efforts, focusing on Krabi Province. While national institutional frameworks and monitoring technologies like DART buoys have improved, significant gaps remain in the 'last mile'—the connection between national warnings and local action. Key failures include dysfunctional warning towers, inappropriate evacuation routes, and a lack of community-specific risk knowledge. The study argues for a shift toward 'people-centred' EWS that integrates indigenous knowledge, ensures local government accountability, and aligns DRM with community livelihoods to overcome distrust and resource constraints at the sub-national level.

This report details the activities of the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) Directorate from June 1, 2024, to April 2025. It focuses on implementing decisions from the 32nd Conference of the Parties (CoP-32), expanding institutional partnerships, advancing transdisciplinary research on climate, health, and oceans, and strengthening science diplomacy through the IAI Science Diplomacy Center and the STeP Fellowship program.

The report evaluates Denmark's efforts to increase biogas production from 5% to 50% of total manure by 2020 to meet renewable energy and GHG targets. It identifies significant financial and infrastructural barriers at the national level, including a lack of break-even pricing and an 'infrastructural lock-in' favoring existing energy providers. A case study of the Biokraft plant on Bornholm reveals that while political support and nutrient management benefits (such as meeting 'harmony requirements') enable adoption, the plant suffered from failed high-tech investments and unstable manure supply. The report concludes that biogas's effectiveness as a tool for combating nutrient pollution is contested, and its success depends on multi-stakeholder innovation partnerships and a more transparent debate on its actual risks and benefits.