Search Climate Insights Directory

The 2020 workshop series, convened by WWF and partners, brought together over 130 international stakeholders to evaluate seaweed as a livestock feed ingredient. The discussions focused on three primary areas: animal productivity and health, the chemical composition of seaweed, and the validation of greenhouse gas (GHG) measurements. Key findings highlight the role of bromoform in methane reduction, the necessity of standardizing seaweed analytics, and the importance of life cycle analyses (LCAs) to assess total environmental impact. The report emphasizes that for adoption to occur, seaweed must be safe, scalable, and have a neutral or positive impact on animal productivity.

The report reviews research needs for SDG 14, categorizing them into three themes: marine pollution, ocean and climate, and sustainable use of marine resources. It highlights critical knowledge gaps in the Arctic and Baltic Sea, the need for standardized global monitoring of microplastics and acidification, and the challenge of balancing short-term economic demands with long-term environmental protection. The document emphasizes that while science can characterize challenges and provide solutions, effective mitigation depends on political will and multi-disciplinary collaboration.

The report identifies significant knowledge gaps hindering the achievement of the 2030 Agenda and argues that research must play four roles: characterizing challenges, providing solutions, coordinating dialogue, and critically analyzing the goals. Using SDGs 12, 14, and 17 as examples, it highlights the need for more applied 'action research' and a deeper understanding of goal interactions and international spill-over effects. The authors propose a tiered approach to structural reform, ranging from incremental improvements in open data and communication to transformative changes such as funding research led by third countries and reorienting the innovation system away from incremental economic growth toward social and climate justice.

The document details a May 2012 meeting in Nairobi involving 19 researchers and practitioners to address the dominance of Northern perspectives in gender, peace and security (GPS) scholarship. Participants identified critical gaps in current research, such as the lack of evidence-based homegrown data and the failure to address structural causes of insecurity. The session concluded with the proposal to establish a pan-African think-tank to generate scientific knowledge and alternative narratives that reflect African experiences and agency, moving beyond 'women as victims' discourses.