Search Climate Insights Directory

The report outlines a structured approach for Fiji to track 160 prioritized adaptation actions across five systems and five sectoral components. It proposes a two-part M&E methodology combining a simple 'traffic light' monitoring system for progress with a more complex process- and results-based evaluation for effectiveness. The framework emphasizes the need for interministerial coordination, the use of primary and secondary data sources, and the potential for an online National Adaptation Registry to centralize information. It also highlights the importance of aligning the NAP M&E with international commitments such as the Paris Agreement, Sustainable Development Goals, and the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction.

The document advocates for outcome-oriented energy efficiency metrics, such as kWh per customer, as a more transparent and less administratively burdensome alternative to measure-by-measure savings calculations. It details several potential metrics, discusses the necessity of adjustment mechanisms for exogenous factors like weather and GDP, and provides recommendations for regulators to minimize regulatory conflict by using independently verified data.

The working paper by the Graz Group outlines strategies to enhance the environmental integrity and completeness of LULUCF accounting. It suggests moving toward 'fuller accounting' through activities-based, emissions/removals-based, or land-use-based approaches. Key recommendations include mandatory accounting for forest and peatland degradation, a 'restricted stock-change approach' for harvested wood products to prevent false credits, and policy-based methods for 'factoring out' natural disturbances. The authors argue that current Kyoto Protocol rules allow significant emissions from degradation to go uncounted, particularly in Annex I countries that did not elect Article 3.4.

The report argues that current indicators for SDG 16 do not fully capture the goal's ambition and recommends integrating survey-based perception data alongside administrative data. For target 16.1 (violence), it suggests adding conflict-related deaths and a safety indicator. For 16.3 (justice), it proposes a broader dispute resolution indicator. For 16.7 (inclusion), it recommends measuring perceived inclusivity of decision-making and electoral turnout. For 16.10 (freedoms), it suggests indicators for the freedom to express political opinion and the implementation of access to information guarantees.

The briefing argues against the simple extrapolation of financial discount rates to physical carbon flows when assessing the emissions impact of land-use change for biofuels. It proposes distinguishing between the 'project horizon' (cultivation period) and the 'impact horizon' (atmospheric effect period), suggesting the latter be treated as a rolling target. The document further recommends that salvaged carbon from future revegetation be excluded from initial conversion accounting and suggests that if discounting is necessary, a range of values—including zero or negative rates—should be considered.

The document argues that the potential emissions from reserves held by the 200 largest public fossil fuel companies (at least 1,541 GtCO2) significantly exceed the remaining global carbon budget for a 2°C temperature rise (986 GtCO2). It identifies a gap in current reporting, noting that financial standards focus on reserve size while GHG standards focus on historical emissions. To address this, the paper recommends a methodology using the Petroleum Resource Management System and the Committee for Mineral Reserves International Reporting Standards to quantify reserves, adding internal fuel use and losses from flaring, venting, and fugitive activities, and excluding projected carbon storage from CCS projects.