Search Climate Insights Directory

The document argues that agricultural productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa is hindered by gender gaps, as women provide the bulk of agricultural labour but lack decision-making power and access to resources. It introduces a conceptual framework for empowerment based on agency, structure, and relations, and discusses the necessity of addressing land ownership and value chain participation to improve food security and nutrition. The brief highlights that closing the gender gap in agricultural inputs could lift 100–150 million people out of hunger.

The report analyzes the private sector's role in the REDD+ supply chain, identifying key players as investors, producers, brokers, advisors, auditors, and end-buyers. It highlights critical barriers such as policy uncertainty, land tenure disputes, and the need for robust social and environmental safeguards. The document proposes strategies to scale up private investment, including the integration of REDD+ into compliance carbon markets, the adoption of nested crediting frameworks, and the inclusion of extractive industries in conservation dialogues.

The report argues that AWM interventions often fail to capture holistic impacts beyond direct project boundaries, frequently overlooking negative externalities and socio-economic shifts. To address this, the authors propose a synthesised M&E framework based on five livelihood capitals: financial, human, natural, physical, and social. The document emphasizes the necessity of baseline assessments, participatory M&E, and the inclusion of both project-level and impact-level indicators to facilitate adaptive management. It applies this framework to review the M&E practices of International Development Enterprises (IDE) and IDE-India, and demonstrates its use in a baseline assessment in the Mkindo watershed of Tanzania.

The document argues that international financial support for climate mitigation in developing countries must shift from simply purchasing cheap carbon offsets to supporting comprehensive low-carbon development strategies. It details a variety of Public Finance Mechanisms (PFMs)—including grants, loans, equity, and risk guarantees—and maps these to the specific needs of project developers, private investors, and governments. The authors emphasize that tailored support is necessary to address incremental costs and high policy and technology risks, suggesting that a 'social value of carbon' could serve as a reference price to stabilize investments. The paper concludes that a combination of bilateral cooperation for flexible grants and multilateral institutions for large-scale loans and guarantees is essential to leverage the private capital needed for a global low-carbon transition.

The document advocates for the integration of rainwater harvesting into water resource management to improve livelihoods and protect ecosystems. It highlights the technology's ability to boost rainfed agriculture, reduce urban flood risks, and provide a decentralized alternative to expensive public water infrastructure. The brief emphasizes that rainwater harvesting is particularly essential for adapting to increased rainfall variability caused by climate change and can contribute to several Millennium Development Goals, including poverty reduction and gender equality.

The review finds that AWM interventions generally produce positive impacts across five capitals—financial, natural, social, physical, and human—with projects employing multiple interventions yielding more positive results. However, it highlights a critical lack of systematic monitoring and evaluation, particularly regarding negative externalities and long-term sustainability.

The document argues that the PS/EPs fail to provide a robust framework for managing human rights risks, citing substantial gaps in substantive standards, due diligence procedures, and grievance mechanisms. Through a review of 61 project cases and an analysis using the Danish Institute for Human Rights' tool, the authors conclude that the PS/EPs do not align with international human rights norms and require significant amendment to ensure project sponsors meet their baseline responsibility to respect human rights.

The report details a workshop on integrating public benefits—such as rural electrification, energy efficiency, and renewable energy—into power sector reforms in developing countries. It argues that while reforms can threaten traditional public benefit delivery, they also create opportunities for new, more transparent regulatory frameworks. The document emphasises the need for broader stakeholder involvement, including NGOs and academia, and calls for specialised training and research-based capacity building to ensure reforms align with sustainable development goals.

The report examines the critical role of land and resource tenure in community-based conservation, contrasting the often-destructive nature of state-owned 'public' tenure with the adaptive and sustainable characteristics of community-based systems. It argues that when states delegitimize local tenure, they often create 'open access' conditions that lead to biodiversity loss and resource pillaging. Conversely, secure community tenure—characterized by flexible, overlapping rights and deep ecological knowledge—tends to support long-term resource stability. The authors advocate for the official state recognition of community perimeters rather than the detailed codification of customary laws, which can disrupt local flexibility. While acknowledging that tenure alone does not guarantee conservation success, the text concludes that the erosion of community rights is a primary driver of environmental degradation in many developing nations.

The report analyzes the ESG reporting practices of 70 SMEs globally, categorized by size (micro to medium+) and sector. It highlights strengths in local community impact, water reporting in water-scarce regions, and detailed life-cycle analyses (LCAs) for specific products. While many SMEs use global frameworks like the SDGs, the report notes gaps in Scope 3 GHG emissions reporting and a continued reliance on narrative rather than quantitative disclosures in some cases.